IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/stagec/257875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new approach for participative rural development in Georgia – reflecting transfer of knowledge and enhancing innovation in a non-European Union context

Author

Listed:
  • Oedl-Wieser, Theresia
  • Dax, Thomas
  • Fischer, Michael

Abstract

Despite achieving independence 25 years ago, Georgia is still a country in transition which is striving to overcome wide-ranging economic development problems, particularly evident through outmigration from rural areas to urban centres and foreign countries, as well as through restricted employment integration. The ‘European Neighbourhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development in Georgia’ focuses on local development in rural regions as a main national goal and offers a series of pilot actions to apply LEADER-like activities in various rural parts of the country. In this paper the application of such pilot a scheme in Borjomi Municipality, the observed case study in the Lesser Caucasus, is analysed. Reviews show a highly committed implementation process, comprising the establishment of the Local Action Group, the elaboration of the Local Development Strategy, an on-going mobilisation process of local actors and the transfer of experiences and good practices from European Union Member States. The assessment of the potential of the LEADER approach in the rural and mountainous area of Borjomi Municipality reveals a high degree of acceptance and interest of rural stakeholders and residents to taking up such an approach and engaging in innovative initiatives within the frame of sustainable rural development. Given the short period of work with these ideas so far, continued knowledge transfer, and enhanced appreciation and participation in search of place-specific opportunities in rural regions will be essential for successful rural development pathways across Georgia.

Suggested Citation

  • Oedl-Wieser, Theresia & Dax, Thomas & Fischer, Michael, 2017. "A new approach for participative rural development in Georgia – reflecting transfer of knowledge and enhancing innovation in a non-European Union context," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 119(1), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:257875
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.257875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/257875/files/1012_oedl-wieser_v3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.257875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Augustyn, Anna & Nemes, Gusztav, 2014. "Catching up with the West? Europeanising rural policies in Hungary and Poland," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 168921, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Doitchinova, Julia & Stoyanova, Zornitsa, 2014. "Activation Of Local Communities For Development Of Rural Areas," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Dax, Thomas & Oedl-Wieser, Theresia, 2016. "Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(1), pages 1-8, April.
    4. Bock, Bettina B., 2012. "Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 114(2), pages 1-7, October.
    5. Augustyn, Anna & Nemes, Gusztáv, 2014. "Catching up with the West? Europeanisation of policies in Hungary and Poland," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 116(3), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lela Khartishvili & Andreas Muhar & Thomas Dax & Ioseb Khelashvili, 2019. "Rural Tourism in Georgia in Transition: Challenges for Regional Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Theissen Tim & Otte Annette & Waldhardt Rainer, 2019. "Land-Use Change Related to Topography and Societal Drivers in High-Mountains – A Case Study in the Upper Watershed of the Tergi (Kazbegi Region), Greater Caucasus," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 317-340, September.
    3. Sisto, Roberta & Fernández-Portillo, Luis A. & Yazdani, Morteza & Estepa-Mohedano, Lorenzo & Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi, 2022. "Strategic planning of rural areas: Integrating participatory backcasting and multiple criteria decision analysis tools," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    4. Tim Theissen & Annette Otte & Rainer Waldhardt, 2022. "High-Mountain Landscape Classification to Analyze Patterns of Land Use and Potential Natural Vegetation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Anestis Fotiadis & Guych Nuryyev & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Anastasia Spyridou, 2019. "The Impact of EU Sponsorship, Size, and Geographic Characteristics on Rural Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Fernandez Portillo, Luis A. & Nekhay, Olexandr & Estepa Mohedano, Lorenzo, 2019. "Use of the ANP methodology to prioritize rural development strategies under the LEADER approach in protected areas. The case of Lagodekhi, Georgia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navarro Francisco & Labianca Marilena & Cejudo Eugenio & de Rubertis Stefano & Salento Angelo & Maroto Juan Carlos & Belliggiano Angelo, 2018. "Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 107-126, March.
    2. Perger Eva, 2016. "Local Responses to the Structural Changes of National Development Policyin Hungarian Rural Regions," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 69-83, December.
    3. Navarro, Francisco & Cejudo, Euginio & Maroto, Juan, 2016. "Participation of disadvantaged groups and governance in the LEADER and PRODER programmes in Andalucía, Spain," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(1), pages 1-8, April.
    4. Eugenio Cejudo García & José Antonio Cañete Pérez & Francisco Navarro Valverde & Noelia Ruiz Moya, 2020. "Entrepreneurs and Territorial Diversity: Success and Failure in Andalusia 2007–2015," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Sadowski, Adam, 2015. "Global Determinants Of The Agriculture Development In Poland – Their Effects And Future," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 3(2), pages 1-17.
    6. Sriroop Chaudhuri & Mimi Roy & Louis M. McDonald & Yves Emendack, 2021. "Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2973-3008, March.
    7. Katonáné Kovács, Judit & Navarro, Francisco & Labianca, Marilena, 2016. "Introduction: Human and social capital in rural areas," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(1), pages 1-4, April.
    8. Székely, Vladimír, 2013. "Urban-rural relations as a source of transfer of knowledge: some examples from rural surrounding of Bratislava," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 10, pages 1-21.
    9. Novikova Marina & de Fátima Ferreiro Maria & Stryjakiewicz Tadeusz, 2020. "Local Development Initiatives as Promoters of Social Innovation: Evidence from Two European Rural Regions," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 43-53, June.
    10. Noor, Nur Hanis Mohamad & Ng, Boon-Kwee & Hamid, Mohd Johaary Abdul, 2020. "Forging researchers-farmers partnership in public social innovation: a case study of Malaysia’s agro-based public research institution," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    11. Cristina Dalla Torre & Elisa Ravazzoli & Marijke Dijkshoorn-Dekker & Nico Polman & Mariana Melnykovych & Elena Pisani & Francesca Gori & Riccardo Da Re & Kamini Vicentini & Laura Secco, 2020. "The Role of Agency in the Emergence and Development of Social Innovations in Rural Areas. Analysis of Two Cases of Social Farming in Italy and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, May.
    12. Marta Guth & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Bazyli Czyżewski & Sebastian Stępień, 2020. "The Economic Sustainability of Farms under Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Antonio Baselice & Maurizio Prosperi & Valentino Marini Govigli & Antonio Lopolito, 2021. "Application of a Comprehensive Methodology for the Evaluation of Social Innovations in Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Ivana Živojinović & Alice Ludvig & Karl Hogl, 2019. "Social Innovation to Sustain Rural Communities: Overcoming Institutional Challenges in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Orozco-Meléndez, José Francisco & Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime, 2022. "A role for grassroots innovation toward agroecological transitions in the Global South? Evidence from Mexico," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    16. Tirziu, Andreea-Maria, 2017. "Promoting social innovation in rural areas through living labs," MPRA Paper 79870, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Mendoza-Moheno, Jessica & Cruz-Coria, Erika & González-Cruz, Tomás F, 2021. "Socio-technical innovation in community-based tourism organizations: A proposal for local development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. Diogo Soares da Silva & Lummina G. Horlings & Elisabete Figueiredo, 2018. "Citizen Initiatives in the Post-Welfare State," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Richter, Ralph & Christmann, Gabriela B., 2021. "On the role of key players in rural social innovation processes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue (Articles.
    20. Weiss, Gerhard & Hansen, Eric & Ludvig, Alice & Nybakk, Erlend & Toppinen, Anne, 2021. "Innovation governance in the forest sector: Reviewing concepts, trends and gaps," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:257875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/akiiihu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.