IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sojoae/29914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role Of Economics And Other Social Sciences In Biotechnology Research

Author

Listed:
  • Havlicek, Joseph, Jr.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Havlicek, Joseph, Jr., 1990. "Role Of Economics And Other Social Sciences In Biotechnology Research," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(01), pages 1-4, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29914
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.29914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/29914/files/22010069.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.29914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marshall A. Martin & Joseph Havlicek, 1977. "Some Welfare Implications of the Adoption of Mechanical Cotton Harvesters in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(4), pages 739-744.
    2. Robert J. Kalter & Loren W. Tauer, 1987. "Potential Economic Impacts of Agricultural Biotechnology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 420-425.
    3. Catherine M. Lemieux & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "Ex Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 903-914.
    4. Darrell L. Hueth & Richard E. Just, 1987. "Policy Implications of Agricultural Biotechnology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 426-431.
    5. Andrew Schmitz & David Seckler, 1970. "Mechanized Agriculture and Social Welfare: The Case of the Tomato Harvester," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 52(4), pages 569-577.
    6. Luther Tweeten & Mike Welsh, 1987. "The Economics of Agricultural Biotechnology: Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 440-442.
    7. Judith I. Stallmann & A. Allan Schmid, 1987. "Property Rights in Plants: Implications for Biotechnology Research and Extension," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 432-437.
    8. Walter L. Fishel, 1987. "The Economics of Agricultural Biotechnology: Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 438-439.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tun-Hsiang Yu & C. Phillip Baumel & Connie L. Hardy & Marty J. McVey & Lawrence A. Johnson & Jerry L. Sell, 2001. "Impacts of six genetic modifications of corn on feed cost and consumption of traditional feed ingredients," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 115-127.
    2. Lei, Lei, 2018. "Effects of trade policy on technological innovation in agricultural markets - implications for the developing economies," IDE Discussion Papers 687, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    3. McVey, Marty Jay, 1996. "Valuing quality differentiated grains from a total logistics perspective," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000012326, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Tun-Hsiang Yu & C. Phillip Baumel & Marty J. McVey & Jerry L. Sell, 2001. "Economics of the use of imported U.S. high oil corn in swine and poultry rations in Taiwan," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 539-556.
    5. Michael Harris & Alan Lloyd, 1991. "The Returns to Agricultural Research and the Underinvestment Hypothesis ‐ A Survey," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 24(3), pages 16-27, July.
    6. Everett B. Peterson & Paul V. Preckel & Thomas W. Hertel & Anya M. McGuirk, 1992. "Impacts of growth stimulants in the domestic livestock sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 287-307.
    7. Yu, Tun-Hsiang, 1998. "The benefits and costs of transporting an identity preserved product from Iowa to Taiwan," ISU General Staff Papers 1998010108000018184, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Caswell, Margriet F. & Fuglie, Keith O. & Klotz, Cassandra A., 1994. "Agricultural Biotechnology: An Economic Perspective," Agricultural Economic Reports 262025, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Zhi Xu, 1994. "Assessing Distributional Impacts of Forest Policies and Projects," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(3), pages 281-311, June.
    10. Hodge, Ian D., 1983. "Rural Employment and the Quality of Life," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(03), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Ruttan, Vernon W., 1980. "Agricultural Research And The Future Of American Agriculture," Staff Papers 13561, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    12. A.Allan Schmid, 2004. "The Spartan School Of Institutional Economics At Michigan State University," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Wisconsin "Government and Business" and the History of Heterodox Economic Thought, pages 207-243, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    13. Rausser, Gordon C. & de Janvry, Alain & Schmitz, Andrew & Zilberman, David D., 1980. "Principal issues in the evaluation of public research in agriculture," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt74v9m7dh, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    14. Vernon Ruttan, 1980. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 529-547, January.
    15. Cooke, Stephen C., 1990. "The Role Of Value Added In Benefit/Cost Analysis," A.E. Research Series 140522, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    16. Lesser, William H., 1997. "Assessing the Implications of IPR on Plant and Animal Agriculture," Staff Papers 121166, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    17. Diane Charlton, 2022. "Seasonal farm labor and COVID‐19 spread," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1591-1609, September.
    18. Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald J. & Kliebenstein, James B., 1993. "Impacts Of Pst On Optimal Production And Marketing Decisions Of A Grow-Finish Hog Farm Operation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-9, October.
    19. Lazarus, William F., 1990. "Midwest Pork Producers' Business Characteristics, Performance And Technology," Economic Reports 13042, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. William Friedland, 2006. "Book Review," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 23(2), pages 253-262, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.