IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/saeasj/359035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Sri Lankan Cinnamon Export Competitiveness in the Global Market

Author

Listed:
  • Hewavitharana, S.D.
  • Kuruppu, I.V.
  • Priyankara, E.A.C.

Abstract

Cinnamon is the most valuable and important spice export crop in Sri Lanka which accounts over 85% of the world cinnamon exports. Competitiveness is one of the major challenges in cinnamon trade in an era of free trade. Intense competition faced by Sri Lanka with other countries results in adverse impacts on cinnamon trade thus decreasing its potential trading opportunities. This study aims to analyze the export competitiveness of Sri Lankan cinnamon in the world market. The study also considers the world’s top 10 cinnamon exporters. The contribution of this paper is that it measures the comparative advantage using a range of indexes namely the Balassa Revealed Comparative Advantage Index (BRCA), Additive Revealed Comparative Advantage Index (ARCA), Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantage Index (NRCA), Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage Index (RSCA) and Trade Balance Index (TBI) for the period from 2001 to 2020. Data are extracted from the International Trade Center (ITC) trade map (COMTRADE) database. BRCA (566.49), ARCA (0.01207), NRCA (7.28*10-6), and RSCA (0.996) result indicate that Sri Lanka has the highest comparative advantage in the global cinnamon export market. Madagascar (0.999) has the highest TBI value. The result of product mapping indicates that Sri Lanka, Madagascar, Vietnam, Indonesia and China have both comparative advantage and positive trade balances over other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Hewavitharana, S.D. & Kuruppu, I.V. & Priyankara, E.A.C., 2022. "Assessment of Sri Lankan Cinnamon Export Competitiveness in the Global Market," Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics, Sri Lanka Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA), vol. 23(01), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:saeasj:359035
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.359035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/359035/files/Cinnamon.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.359035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Run Yu & Junning Cai & PingSun Leung, 2009. "The normalized revealed comparative advantage index," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 43(1), pages 267-282, March.
    2. Alex Hoen & Jan Oosterhaven, 2006. "On the measurement of comparative advantage," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 40(3), pages 677-691, August.
    3. Girik Allo, Albertus & Sukartini, Ni Made & Widodo, Tri, 2017. "Dynamic Changes in Comparative Advantage of Indonesian Agricultural Products," MPRA Paper 80028, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Tebogo B. Seleka & Pinkie G. Kebakile, 2017. "Export Competitiveness of Botswana’s Beef Industry," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 76-101, January.
    5. Bent Dalum & Keld Laursen & Gert Villumsen, 1998. "Structural Change in OECD Export Specialisation Patterns: de-specialisation and 'stickiness'," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 423-443.
    6. Tri WIDODO, 2009. "Comparative Advantage: Theory, Empirical Measures And Case Studies," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 4, pages 57-82, November.
    7. Thomas Vollrath, 1991. "A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 127(2), pages 265-280, June.
    8. Tri Widodo, 2008. "Dynamic changes in comparative advantage: Japan “flying geese” model and its implications for China," Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(3), pages 200-213, October.
    9. Tri Widodo, 2008. "Dynamic changes in comparative advantage: Japan “flying geese” model and its implications for China," Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(3), pages 200-213, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominika Choros-Mrozowska, 2020. "Changes and Comparisons in Pattern of Polish Chinese Trade within the “16+1” Format," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 327-342.
    2. Jenny P. Danna-Buitrago & Rémi Stellian, 2022. "A New Class of Revealed Comparative Advantage Indexes," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 477-503, July.
    3. Viet V. Hoang, 2019. "Investigating the evolution of agricultural trade specialization in transition economies: A case study from Vietnam," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 361-378, July.
    4. Hoang, V. V. & Tran, K. T. & Tu, B. V. & Nguyen, V. N. & Nguyen, A. Q., 2017. "Agricultural Competitiveness of Vietnam by the RCA and the NRCA Indices, and Consistency of Competitiveness Indices," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(4).
    5. Jámbor, Attila & Tóth, Andrea Tímea & Kőröshegyi, Domonkos, 2017. "Az agrárexport versenyképessége - a nemzetközi fűszer-kereskedelem esete [Export competitiveness in agriculture: the case of the international spice trade]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1202-1223.
    6. Ufuk gunes Bebek, 2011. "Consistency of the proposed additive measures of revealed comparative advantage," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(3), pages 2491-2499.
    7. Irena BENESOVA & Mansoor MAITAH & Lubos SMUTKA & Karel TOMSIK & Natalia ISHCHUKOVA, 2017. "Perspectives of the Russian agricultural exports in terms of comparative advantage," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(7), pages 318-330.
    8. Iglesias, Matias Nehuen, 2021. "Measuring size distortions of location quotients," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 189-205.
    9. Satyendra Nath Chakrabartty, 2023. "Constructing Aggregated Revealed Comparative Advantage Index of a Country," Journal of Asian Economic Integration, , vol. 5(1), pages 64-77, April.
    10. Kaveri Deb & Bodhisattva Sengupta, 2017. "On Empirical Distribution of RCA Indices," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 6(1), pages 23-41, January.
    11. Andrey A. Gnidchenko & Vladimir A. Salnikov, 2015. "Net Comparative Advantage Index: Overcoming the Drawbacks of the Existing Indices," HSE Working papers WP BRP 119/EC/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    12. Singh, O.P. & Anoop, M. & Singh, P.K., 2020. "Revealed Comparative Advantage, Competitiveness and Growth Performance: Evidences from India’s Foreign Trade of Agricultural Commodities," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), December.
    13. Bojnec, Štefan & Fertő, Imre, 2018. "Economic Crisis and the Fragility of Comparative Advantage in European Agriculture," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(3), September.
    14. Ufuk Gunes Bebek, 2011. "Robustness of the Proposed Measures of Revealed Comparative Advantage," Studies in Economics 1121, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    15. Liu, Bin & Gao, Jianbo, 2019. "Understanding the non-Gaussian distribution of revealed comparative advantage index and its alternatives," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Kaveri Deb & Bodhisattva Sengupta, 2018. "Value-Added Trade and Empirical Distributions of RCA Indices," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 16(1), pages 235-264, March.
    17. Moreno-Brieva, Fernando, 2022. "Effective way to measure the specialization levels of an economy in the era of global value chains," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 420-429.
    18. Rémi Stellian & Jair N. Ojeda-Joya & Jenny P. Danna-Buitrago, 2024. "Time stationarity, shape and ordinal ranking bias of RCA indexes: a new set of measures," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 160(2), pages 675-711, May.
    19. Ufuk Gunes Bebek, 2011. "Monotonicity of additive indices of revealed comparative advantage," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(2), pages 1894-1901.
    20. Kaveri Deb & William R. Hauk, 2017. "RCA indices, multinational production and the Ricardian trade model," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saeasj:359035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/slaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.