IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/reowae/343525.html

Nurturing Growth: Agri-Startup Landscape in India and the Challenges Ahead

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar, K. Nirmal Ravi
  • Babu, T. Ramesh
  • Deshmukh, Sagar Surendra

Abstract

Agri-startups in India are pivotal drivers of innovation and entrepreneurship, addressing critical challenges related to food security, rural livelihoods, and environmental sustainability. These startups leverage advanced technologies, data analytics, and precision farming techniques to enhance agricultural productivity and reduce post-harvest losses, contributing significantly to achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Government initiatives such as the “Innovation and Agri-Entrepreneurship Development” program, coupled with strategic collaborations with foreign entities, have provided substantial momentum to the agri-startup ecosystem in India. Through this concerted effort, various stakeholders, including Knowledge Partners and Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana—Agribusiness Incubators, are actively nurturing and scaling innovative agricultural projects. Regions like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujarat, and Uttar Pradesh have emerged as hotspots for agri-startup activity, benefiting from conducive policy environments and robust agricultural infrastructure. The landscape of agri-tech investments in India has seen significant growth, with a notable surge in 2021, reaching $1.18 billion across 66 transactions. Despite a more cautious approach from investors in 2022, the number of transactions increased, indicating sustained interest. The agri-tech sector demonstrates maturity, with a steady investment pipeline and a notable increase in deals surpassing the $5 million threshold. Agri-startups empower smallholder farmers, contributing to SDGs related to food security, poverty alleviation, and environmental sustainability, fostering innovation and sustainability in the agricultural sector. Agri-startups encounter several challenges, viz., limited access to capital, regulatory complexities, and technological limitations, hindering their growth. Pricing issues, market penetration constraints, and investor apathy further impede scalability. Despite these challenges, agri-startups promote environmental sustainability through practices like organic farming and water conservation. Collaborative research, training programs, and alignment with global sustainability trends empower farmers and position agri-startups to capitalize on emerging opportunities in sustainable agriculture markets worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar, K. Nirmal Ravi & Babu, T. Ramesh & Deshmukh, Sagar Surendra, 2024. "Nurturing Growth: Agri-Startup Landscape in India and the Challenges Ahead," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:343525
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343525/files/RWAE-0502-1073.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.343525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christina Theodoraki & Karim Messeghem & Mark P. Rice, 2018. "A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 153-170, June.
    2. Zoltan J. Acs & Erik Stam & David B. Audretsch & Allan O’Connor, 2017. "The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 1-10, June.
    3. A. Sharma & Sagar Surendra Deshmukh & Ankur Ojha, 2023. "Business Model Innovation to Address Vegetable Supply Chain Issues: A Case Study of an Indian Startup," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Antonella Silvestri & Stefania Veltri, 2020. "Exploring the relationships between corporate social responsibility, leadership, and sustainable entrepreneurship theories: A conceptual framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 585-594, March.
    5. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Disha Gulia & Sapna Arora & Akriti Sharma, 2025. "Impact of incubation resources on agri-food startup performance: insights from Indian incubatees," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Fink & Daniela Maresch & Ludovit Garzik & Rainer Harms, 2025. "We are in this together: leading resource exchange between entrepreneurial ecosystems to strategically steer their development," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1447-1464, October.
    2. Patrick Gregori & Erich Schwarz & Patrick Holzmann, 2025. "Agencing entrepreneurial ecosystems for sustainability: A systematic review to rethink values, transformation, and boundaries," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1755-1790, October.
    3. Christina Theodoraki & Alexis Catanzaro, 2022. "Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 383-406, April.
    4. Chaudhary, Sanjay & Kaur, Puneet & Ferraris, Alberto & Bresciani, Stefano & Dhir, Amandeep, 2024. "Connecting entrepreneurial ecosystem and innovation. Grasping at straws or hitting a home run?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Nasser Al‐Baimani & Nick Clifton & Eleri Jones & Rhiannon Pugh, 2021. "Applying the ecosystem model in a new context? The case of business incubation in Oman," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 663-686, June.
    6. Philip T. Roundy & Subin Im, 2025. "Combining cognition and context: entrepreneurial alertness and the microfoundations of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 57-75, March.
    7. Alejandro Almeida & Antonio A. Golpe & Juan Manuel Martín-Álvarez & Jose Carlos Vides, 2025. "New England’s Pinnacle: fostering quality entrepreneurial ecosystems," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(1), pages 243-271, March.
    8. Mamta Tripathi & David Jarvis & Kate Broadhurst, 2024. "Globalisation and competitive strategies of firms in traditional manufacturing sectors of the West Midlands," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 39(1-2), pages 61-83, March.
    9. Giovanni Negri & Giacomo Ciambotti & Christina Theodoraki & David Littlewood, 2025. "Stagnating or flourishing? How entrepreneurial support organizations navigate constraints in nascent ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1651-1679, October.
    10. Ana Joana Fernandes & Joao J. Ferreira, 2022. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks: a literature review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 189-247, January.
    11. Intenza, Marika & Capobianco, Nunzia & Sarto, Fabrizia & Saggese, Sara, 2025. "Opening the black box: Exploring innovation pathways from entrepreneurial ecosystems to financial performance in healthcare organisations," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    12. Rhiannon Pugh & Jana Schmutzler & Alexandra Tsvetkova, 2021. "Taking the systems approaches out of their comfort zones: Perspectives from under explored contexts," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 608-620, June.
    13. Petra Maresova & Ruzena Stemberkova & Oluwaseun Fadeyi, 2019. "Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-36, September.
    14. Colin Donaldson, 2021. "Culture in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: a conceptual framing," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 289-319, March.
    15. Fahimeh Khatami & Enrico Cagno & Luboš Smrčka & Zoltan Rozsa, 2024. "Assessing the role of FinTech in entrepreneurial ecosystems at the international level," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3373-3402, December.
    16. Zahra, Shaker A. & Liu, Wan & Si, Steven, 2023. "How digital technology promotes entrepreneurship in ecosystems," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Ángel Rodríguez-López & Jaime E. Souto, 2020. "Empowering entrepreneurial capacity: training, innovation and business ethics," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(1), pages 23-43, March.
    18. Silva, Lucas Emmanuel Nascimento & Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Faria, Aline Mariane de & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2024. "Innovation processes in ecosystem settings: An integrative framework and future directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Hernández-Chea, Roberto & Mahdad, Maral & Minh, Thai Thi & Hjortsø, Carsten Nico, 2021. "Moving beyond intermediation: How intermediary organizations shape collaboration dynamics in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Rabelo Neto, José & Figueiredo, Claudia & Gabriel, Bárbara Coelho & Valente, Robertt, 2024. "Factors for innovation ecosystem frameworks: Comprehensive organizational aspects for evolution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:343525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nassg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.