IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/remaae/12479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Uruguay Round: From Cold War To Cooperation In Negotiating Temperate-zone Agricultural And Trade Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Hillman, Jimmye S.

Abstract

It is not likely that Governments will take precipitous action following the Uruguay Round. However, the large industrial economies should continue to press heavily for the revision of farm programs until a better accommodation is reached. The moves toward gradual decoupling of farmers' support payments from agricultural output and price levels should be the first order of business of Governments everywhere. This reform should be supplemented by greater international attention to domestic policies which create non-tariff barriers to trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Hillman, Jimmye S., 1994. "The Uruguay Round: From Cold War To Cooperation In Negotiating Temperate-zone Agricultural And Trade Policies," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(02), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:remaae:12479
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.12479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/12479/files/62020215.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.12479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon Tullock & Jimmye Hillman, 1991. "Public Choice and Agriculture: An American Example," International Economic Association Series, in: Partha Dasgupta (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Economics, chapter 5, pages 98-118, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Petrey, L.A. & Johnson, R.W.M., 1993. "Agriculture in the Uruguay Round: Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(03), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Haley, Stephen L., 1993. "Environmental And Agricultural Policy Linkages In The European Community: The Nitrate Problem And Cap Reform," Working Papers 51117, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. J. S. Hillman, 1992. "Confessions Of A Double Agent In The Ec‐Us Agricultural Policy Argument," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 327-342, September.
    5. Shane, Mathew D. & von Witzke, Harald, 1993. "The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade: A Proceedings," Staff Reports 278700, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Runge, C. Ford, 1992. "Environmental Effects Of Trade In The Agricultural Sector: A Case Study," Working Papers 14449, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donald MacLaren, 1995. "The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture: A New Order?," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 2(3), pages 281-290.
    2. Chadee, Doren & Johnson, R.W.M., 1994. "The Uruguay Round: Final Agreements and Directions: Domestic Support," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(02), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Arcus, Peter L., 1994. "Whither Agricultural Economics: A Look Ahead to the Twenty First Century," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(03), pages 1-8, December.
    4. MacLaren, Donald, 1995. "The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture: A New World Order for Agricultural Trade?," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(01), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Calvin, Linda & Krissoff, Barry, 1998. "Technical Barriers To Trade: A Case Study Of Phytosanitary Barriers And U.S. - Japanese Apple Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Krissoff, Barry & Ballenger, Nicole & Dunmore, John C. & Gray, Denice, 1996. "Exploring Linkages Among Agriculture, Trade, and the Environment: Issues for the Next Century," Agricultural Economic Reports 33961, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Colyer, Dale, 2002. "Environmental Issues In The Ftaa," Conference Papers 19107, West Virginia University, Department of Agricultural Resource Economics.
    4. Mann, Stefan, 2005. "Deliberation, Responsivity and Power in German and Swiss Agricultural Policy," Agrarwirtschaft und Agrarsoziologie\ Economie et Sociologie Rurales, Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 2005(1), pages 1-18.
    5. Karl D. Meilke & Don McClatchy & Harry de Gorter, 1996. "Challenges in quantitative economic analysis in support of multilateral trade negotiations," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(3), pages 185-200, August.
    6. Grant Hauer & C. Ford Runge, 1999. "Trade‐Environment Linkages in the Resolution of Transboundary Externalities," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 25-39, January.
    7. Yinhao Wu & Enru Wang & Changhong Miao, 2019. "Fertilizer Use in China: The Role of Agricultural Support Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Vande Kamp, Philip R. & Runge, C. Ford, 1994. "Trends and Developments in United States Agricultural Policy: 1993-1995," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(03), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Hartmann, M., 1994. "Die Bedeutung von Umweltsteuern für den internationalen Handel – Simulationsrechnung mit dem Handelsmodell TEPSIM," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 30.
    10. Hillman, Jimmye S., 1996. "Nontariff Agricultural Trade Barriers Revisited," Working Papers 14602, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    11. Álvaro Quijandría, 1993. "El comercio internacional y el medio ambiente," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 20(33), pages 49-59.
    12. Hartmann, Monika, 1997. "The Impact of EC Nitrogen Taxes on Agricultural Competitiveness and Welfar: Simulations with the World Trade Model TEPSIM," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198205, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Caroline Saunders & Selim Cagatay, 2004. "Trade And The Environment: Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Global Dairy Trade Liberalisation," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 339-365.
    14. Johnson, R.W.M., 1994. "The National Interest, Westminster, And Public Choice," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-30, April.
    15. Chadee, Doren & Johnson, R.W.M., 1994. "The Uruguay Round: Final Agreements and Directions: Domestic Support," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(02), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Liapis, Peter S., 1994. "Environmental And Economic Implications Of Alternative Ec Policies," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-11, July.
    17. Philip L. Paarlberg & Maury Bredahl & John G. Lee, 2002. "Multifunctionality and Agricultural Trade Negotiations," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 322-335.
    18. Mathy Sane & Miroslav Hajek & Chukwudi Nwaogu & Ratna Chrismiari Purwestri, 2021. "Subsidy as An Economic Instrument for Environmental Protection: A Case of Global Fertilizer Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Haixiao Huang, Walter C. Labys, 2002. "Environment and trade: a review of issues and methods," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 100-160.
    20. Hillman, Jimmye S., 1994. "From Cold War To Cooperation in Negotiating Temperate-Zone Agricultural and Trade Policies," 1994 Conference (38th), February 8-10, 1994, Wellington, New Zealand 147925, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:remaae:12479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.