IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/remaae/12413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Alliances and Marketing Cooperatives: a Lamb Industry Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Farrell, Terence C.
  • Tozer, Peter R.

Abstract

Producer cooperatives and strategic alliances could assist lamb producers and market efficiency by improving price signals through product grading. Opportunities exist for first and second cross lamb producers to achieve price premiums by forming intersectoral linkages with processors/wholesalers and retailers. Producer cooperatives enable producers to supply consistent quantities of high quality lambs to satisfy the market requirements of the wholesalers/retailers within an alliance. Alternatively, opportunistic lamb suppliers who are constrained by environmental or cost factors may not be able to derive similar price premiums.

Suggested Citation

  • Farrell, Terence C. & Tozer, Peter R., 1996. "Strategic Alliances and Marketing Cooperatives: a Lamb Industry Case Study," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(02), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:remaae:12413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/12413
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, William J. & Porter, Darrell, 1985. "Testing For Changes In The Structure Of The Demand For Meat In Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 29(01), April.
    2. Peter J. Barry & Sonka Steven T. & Kaouthar Lajili, 1992. "Vertical Coordination, Financial Structure, and the Changing Theory of the Firm," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(5), pages 1219-1225.
    3. Murray, Jane, 1984. "Retail Demand for Meat in Australia: A Utility Theory Approach," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 60(168), pages 45-56, March.
    4. Reynolds, R.G. & Gardiner, B., 1980. "Supply Response In The Australian Sheep Industry: A Case For Disaggregation And Dynamics," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 24(03), December.
    5. Freebairn, John W., 1967. "Grading as a Market Innovation," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(03), September.
    6. Mullen, John D., 1995. "The Influence of Fat and Weight on the Price of Lamb in the Homebush Livestock and Wholesale Markets," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(01), April.
    7. Read, Mike & Malcolm, Bill, 1994. "The Changing Victorian Meat Processing Industry," 1994 Conference (38th), February 8-10, 1994, Wellington, New Zealand 148673, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. R.G. Reynolds & B. Gardiner, 1980. "Supply Response In The Australian Sheep Industry: A Case For Disaggregation And Dynamics," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 24(3), pages 196-209, December.
    9. Quilkey, John J., 1986. "Promotion Of Primary Products - A View From The Cloister," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 30(01), April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catherine Morrison Paul, 2003. "Productivity and Efficiency Measurement in Our “New Economy”: Determinants, Interactions, and Policy Relevance," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 161-177, April.
    2. Johnson, R.W.M. & Petrey, L.A. & Schroder, William R., 1996. "Agribusiness: Political Economy and Market Structure - Toward a Structure for Agribusiness," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(02), August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:remaae:12413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.