IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/410093.html

The (In)Stability Of Integration In Agricultural Producer Groups In Poland And Possibilities For Its Mitigation: A Case Study Of The Pig Sector

Author

Listed:
  • KRYSZAK, ŁUKASZ
  • STYBURSKI, WOJCIECH
  • CZUBAK, WAWRZYNIEC

Abstract

Since the introduction of financial support under the Common Agricultural Policy in Poland, substantial funds have been allocated to subsidies for agricultural producer groups (APGs). The existing support system creates a considerable risk that many APGs will cease operations once the minimum operational period required to obtain funding has elapsed. Consequently, cooperation within producer groups may prove unstable, and participating farms may fail to realise the full benefits that could be achieved within a properly functioning group. This article formulates two principal research objectives. The first objective was to assess the survival of agricultural producer groups in Poland in relation to their type of activity and group size, based on the register of the Agency for Restructuring and Modernisation of Agriculture. To achieve this objective, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the Mantel-Cox log-rank test, and the Cox regression model were employed. The second objective was to present the assumptions of an algorithm for settlements between finisher and piglet producers, designed as an example of a mechanism that may support stable cooperation among farmers engaged in pig production. The results indicate that the vast majority of APGs cease operations after 6-7 years, and only around 17% remain active ten years after establishment. Larger APGs, particularly those comprising more than 20 members, demonstrate higher survival rates. Among the main types of groups, those focused on poultry and cattle production exhibited particularly low survival rates. The proposed algorithm may strengthen cooperation among pig producers by significantly reducing income volatility.

Suggested Citation

  • Kryszak, Łukasz & Styburski, Wojciech & Czubak, Wawrzyniec, 2026. "The (In)Stability Of Integration In Agricultural Producer Groups In Poland And Possibilities For Its Mitigation: A Case Study Of The Pig Sector," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2026(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:410093
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.410093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/410093/files/11%20%285%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.410093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sokoli, Olta & Xhoxhi, Orjon & Skreli, Engjell & Imami, Drini & Doluschitz, Reiner, 2021. "Willingness to cooperate in the context of post-communist economy – Why do local rules matter?," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    2. Michał Litwiński & Paulina Luiza Wiza-Augustyniak & Łukasz Kryszak & Wojciech Styburski, 2024. "A new financial settlement approach to stabilize profitability of pig production," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Ji, Chen & Jin, Songqing & Wang, Haitao & Ye, Chunhui, 2019. "Estimating effects of cooperative membership on farmers’ safe production behaviors: Evidence from pig sector in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 231-245.
    4. Shantanu Bhunia & Piyush Kumar Singh, 2025. "Producer organizations in the last 25 years: a bibliometric analysis and meta-review of the literature," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Aleksandra Chlebicka & Michał Pietrzak, 2018. "Size of Membership and Survival Patterns of Producers’ Organizations in Agriculture—Social Aspects Based on Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Ma, Wanglin & Renwick, Alan & Yuan, Peng & Ratna, Nazmun, 2018. "Agricultural cooperative membership and technical efficiency of apple farmers in China: An analysis accounting for selectivity bias," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 122-132.
    7. Jos Bijman, 2018. "Exploring the Sustainability of the Cooperative Model in Dairy: The Case of the Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Hazem S. Kassem & Muhammad Ihtisham & Badar Naseem Siddiqui & Shemei Zhang, 2022. "Can Cooperative Supports and Adoption of Improved Technologies Help Increase Agricultural Income? Evidence from a Recent Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Fang Wu & Xibao Guo & Xia Guo, 2023. "Cooperative membership and new technology adoption of family farms: Evidence from China," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 719-739, September.
    3. Constantine Iliopoulos & Vladislav Valentinov, 2018. "Cooperative Longevity: Why Are So Many Cooperatives So Successful?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-8, September.
    4. Ananya Khajuria & Shaveta Kohli, 2026. "Prioritizing sustainability in agricultural marketing cooperative research: A bibliometric analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(2), pages 291-319, June.
    5. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    6. Yan Liu & Elena Garnevska & Nicola Shadbolt, 2025. "The Role of Agriculture Cooperatives in Green Agri-Food Value Chains in China: Cases in Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Xin Deng & Lingzhi Zhang & Rong Xu & Miao Zeng & Qiang He & Dingde Xu & Yanbin Qi, 2022. "Do Cooperatives Affect Groundwater Protection? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Wang, Anbang & He, Ke & Zhang, Junbiao & Zeng, Yangmei, 2021. "Green Production Technologies and Technical Efficiency of Rice Farmers in China: A Case Study of Straw-Derived Biochar," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315026, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Jasper Grashuis & Theodoros Skevas, 2023. "What is the benefit of membership in farm producer organizations? The case of coffee producers in Peru," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(2), pages 423-443, June.
    10. Iliopoulos, Constantine & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2018. "Cooperative longevity: Why are so many cooperatives so successful?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(10), pages 1-8.
    11. Wanglin Ma & Hongyun Zheng & Yueji Zhu & Jianling Qi, 2022. "Effects of cooperative membership on financial performance of banana farmers in China: A heterogeneous analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 5-27, March.
    12. Lin, Bin & Wang, Xiaoxi & Jin, Songqing & Yang, Wanjiang & Li, Houjian, 2022. "Impacts of cooperative membership on rice productivity: Evidence from China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Erika Ribašauskienė & Diana Šumylė & Artiom Volkov & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Mangirdas Morkunas, 2019. "Evaluating Public Policy Support for Agricultural Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Yubo Liao & Bangbang Zhang & Xiangbin Kong & Liangyou Wen & Dongheng Yao & Yuxuan Dang & Wenguang Chen, 2022. "A Cooperative-Dominated Model of Conservation Tillage to Mitigate Soil Degradation on Cultivated Land and Its Effectiveness Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Jinyang Cai & Fengxiang Ding & Yu Hong & Ruifa Hu, 2021. "An Impact Analysis of Farmer Field Schools on Hog Productivity: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Kifle T. Sebhatu & Fatemeh Taheri & Tekeste Berhanu & Miet Maertens & Steven Van Passel & Marijke D'Haese, 2021. "Beyond focus: Exploring variability of service provision of agricultural cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 207-231, June.
    17. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Xiaojie Zhang, 2025. "Sustainable land use in central China: the effects of different livelihood capital configurations on farmers’ ecological production behaviors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 5225-5251, February.
    18. Carlos Omar Trejo-Pech & Roselia Servín-Juárez & Álvaro Reyes-Duarte, 2023. "What sets cooperative farmers apart from non-cooperative farmers? A transaction cost economics analysis of coffee farmers in Mexico," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Shreya Anand & Souvik Ghosh & Anirban Mukherjee & Arijit Roy, 2026. "How sustainable are the farmer producer companies (FPCs) in India?—Unravelling the determinants of farmers’ perceptions through multivariate analyses," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(2), pages 369-399, June.
    20. Jorge Luis Sánchez-Navarro & Narciso Arcas-Lario & Jos Bijman & Miguel Hernández-Espallardo, 2024. "The role of agricultural cooperatives in mitigating opportunism in the context of complying with sustainability requirements: empirical evidence from Spain," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:410093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.