IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jordng/174514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Transformation of the Agricultural Administration and Associations in East Germany Before and After Unification: Are There Lessons for the Korean Peninsula?

Author

Listed:
  • Wolz, Axel

Abstract

With the collapse of the socialist regime in East Germany in late 1989 and the rising political call for unification in early 1990, a radical and abrupt change of the institutional structure became necessary. The (agricultural) administration had to be totally restructured. This included not only substance, functions and tasks which had to be adjusted, similar to all other transition economies, to the market-economic and pluralistic democratic system, but also the whole administrative set-up had to be re-established in line with the West German system (territorial re-organization). Hence, a new administrative system had to be built up from scratch, while simultaneously the socialist one had to be dismantled in a very short period. However, different to other transition economies, there had been strong support from the West in re-organizing the administrative set-up. Overall, this institutional change seems to have been accomplished successfully as billions of Deutsch Marks could be processed by the agricultural administration in 1990 in order to avoid an imminent collapse of the agricultural sector. In addition, the organizations representing the agricultural population had to be re-organized. The re-organization of the German Farmers’ Union is of special prominence as both German parts were representing completely different agricultural systems. This is the only important organization at national level where East Germans could stay in decision-making positions after unification which had severe repercussions when shaping transformation policies affecting the agricultural sector during the 1990s.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolz, Axel, 2012. "The Transformation of the Agricultural Administration and Associations in East Germany Before and After Unification: Are There Lessons for the Korean Peninsula?," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 35(2), pages 1-33, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:174514
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.174514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/174514/files/35_2_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.174514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathijs, Erik & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 1997. "Agricultural Decollectivization in Central and Eastern Europe," 1997 Conference, August 10-16, 1997, Sacramento, California 197062, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheonjae Lee & Walter Timo de Vries & Uchendu Eugene Chigbu, 2019. "Land Governance Re-Arrangements: The One-Country One-System (OCOS) Versus One-Country Two-System (OCTS) Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernandez, Javier, 2002. "The Common Agricultural Policy and EU Enlargement: Implications for Agricultural Production in the Central and Eastern European Countries," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24945, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Wolz, Axel, 2013. "The organisation of agricultural production in East Germany since World War II: Historical roots and present situation [Organisation der Agrarproduktion in Ostdeutschland seit dem 2. Weltkrieg: His," IAMO Discussion Papers 139, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    3. Pawlikowska Elżbieta & Popek Paulina & Bieda Agnieszka & Moteva & Stoeva Ana, 2017. "Analysis of the Legal Methods of Agricultural Land Protection in Central Europe On the Example of Poland and Bulgaria," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 58-71, June.
    4. Curtiss, Jarmila & Petrick, Martin & Balmann, Alfons, 2005. "Beiträge des 3. Doktorandenworkshops zur Agrarentwicklung in Mittel- und Osteuropa 2005 [Contributions of the 3. Workshop for PhD Candidates on agricultural development in Central and Eastern Europ," IAMO Discussion Papers 83, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    5. J. Sauer & B. Balint, 2008. "Distorted prices and producer efficiency: the case of Romania," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 131-142, April.
    6. Zorya, Sergiy & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2002. "When Will Ukraine be a Global Player on World Agricultural Markets?," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24912, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Juha Honkkila, 1997. "Privatization, Asset Distribution and Equity in Transitional Economies," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1997-125, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. repec:zbw:iamodp:158736 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. V. Nebrat & K. Gorditsa & N. Gorin, 2020. "Structural and financial risks of land capitalization: lessons of domestic history," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 3, pages 75-96.
    10. Lerman, Zvi, 2012. "Land reform and farm performance in Europe and Central Asia: a 20 year perspective," Discussion Papers 120260, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    11. Swinnen, Johan F.M., 1997. "An Explanation Of Land Reform Choices In Central And Eastern Europe," PRG Working Papers 31883, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Political Economy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jordng:174514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kreinkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.