IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/hukrgr/279365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Napraforgó- És Repce Vertikum Versenyképességének Kilátásai

Author

Listed:
  • Popp, József
  • Harangi-Rékás, Mónika
  • Oláh, Judit

Abstract

Az olajmagvak, olajmag dara és növényi olajok árának folyamatos növekedésére számíthatunk 2025-ig, de reálértéken árcsökkenés várható. A növényi olajok ára az olajmagvak árával párhuzamosan alakul (korábban az olajmagvaknál nagyobb ütemben nőtt), mert mérséklődik a bioüzemanyagok iránti kereslet növekedése. Az olajmag darák iránti bővülő keresletet a fejlődő országok növekvő húsfogyasztása idézi elő. A napraforgómag termelése 2016-ban elérte a 47,5 millió tonnát. A napraforgómag exportja csupán évi 1,5-1,9 millió tonna között változott az elmúlt öt évben. Vezető napraforgómag exportőrnek számít az EU-28, Argentína, Kína, Ukrajna és az USA, az importőrök között kiemelést érdemel az EU-28, Törökország, Oroszország, Irán és Kína. Az elmúlt évtizedben a repce termelését a vetésterület expanziója jellemezte, főleg a növekvő biodízelgyártásnak köszönhetően. A jövőben a repce és napraforgó termelését elsősorban az állattenyésztés kibocsátásának alakulása, vagyis olajmagliszt igénye határozza meg, mivel a biodízelgyártás alapanyagigénye stabilizálódik. Az olajnövény ágazat számára a precíziós gazdálkodás jelentheti a jövőt, hiszen egyszerre járhat a jövedelmek növelésével és a környezetterhelés mérséklésével. A precíziós növénytermelési technológia sikeres működtetéséhez nem elégséges csupán a beruházás pénzügyi fedezetének biztosítása, szükség van a gazdálkodó, illetőleg a munkafolyamatokban résztvevő munkaerő aktív részvételére és pozitív hozzáállására is. A sikeres gazdálkodás feltétele ma a képzés, a fejlesztés, az innováció, az alkalmazkodóképesség és a munkavállalók motiválása. ------------------------- Price of oilseeds, oilseed meals and vegetable oil can be expected to grow steadily by 2025, but a fall in real prices is projected. The price evolution of vegetable oils is parallel to the price evolution of oilseeds (previously price of vegetable oil increased at a higher rate than the price of oilseeds) as the demand for biofuels declines. The growing demand for oilseeds is driven by rising meat consumption in developing countries. Global sunflower seed production reached 47.5 million tonnes in 2016. The export of sunflower seed fluctuated only between 1.5 and 1.9 million tonnes per year over the past five years. Leading sunflower seed exporters are the EU-28, Argentina, China, Ukraine and the USA, and the most important importers are the EU-28, Turkey, Russia, Iran and China. Over the last decade, rapeseed production increased by the expansion of the rapeseed area, mainly due to the growing biodiesel production. In the future, the production of rapeseed and sunflower seed will be influenced mainly by the development of livestock production, by the demand for oilseed meal, as the demand of feedstocks for biodiesel production will stabilise. Precision farming in the oilseed sector can determine the future of oilseed production, as it can simultaneously result in increased benefits and mitigation of environmental pressures. To ensure the successful operation of precision farming, it is not enough to ensure the financial means for the investment, the active and a positive attitude of the farmer and workers involved in production is also necessary. The prerequisite for successful management is today training, investment, innovation, adaptability and motivation of employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Popp, József & Harangi-Rékás, Mónika & Oláh, Judit, 2018. "A Napraforgó- És Repce Vertikum Versenyképességének Kilátásai," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 6(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hukrgr:279365
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.279365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/279365/files/JCEGI_2018_6_1_Cikk_4_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.279365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Popp, Jozsef & Somogyi, Andrea & Biro, Tamas, 2010. "Újabb feszültség a láthatáron az élelmiszer- és bioüzemanyag-ipar között?," GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 54(06), pages 1-12.
    2. Taralik, Krisztina, 2007. "Biohajtóanyagok Helyzete Magyarországon," GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 51(06), pages 1-8.
    3. Cacciatore, Michael A. & Scheufele, Dietram A. & Shaw, Bret R., 2012. "Labeling renewable energies: How the language surrounding biofuels can influence its public acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 673-682.
    4. Popp, József & Hollósi, Dávid & Fazakas, Péter & Oláh, Judit, 2017. "A versenyképes mezőgazdaság, a földár és a föld jövedelemtermelő képességének összefüggései," GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 61(06), December.
    5. Lim, Steven & Teong, Lee Keat, 2010. "Recent trends, opportunities and challenges of biodiesel in Malaysia: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 938-954, April.
    6. Popp, József & Fári, Miklós & Antal, Gabriella & Harangi-Rákos, Mónika, 2015. "A fehérjetakarmány-piac kilátásai az EU-ban, különös tekintettel Magyarország fehérjeigényének kielégítésére," GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 59(05), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shin, Jungwoo & Hwang, Won-Sik, 2017. "Consumer preference and willingness to pay for a renewable fuel standard (RFS) policy: Focusing on ex-ante market analysis and segmentation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 32-40.
    2. Shortall, O.K., 2013. "“Marginal land” for energy crops: Exploring definitions and embedded assumptions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 19-27.
    3. Fung, Timothy K.F. & Choi, Doo Hun & Scheufele, Dietram A. & Shaw, Bret R., 2014. "Public opinion about biofuels: The interplay between party identification and risk/benefit perception," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 344-355.
    4. Shapiro, Matthew A., 2020. "Next-generation battery research and development: Non-politicized science at the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Van Dael, Miet & Lizin, Sebastien & Swinnen, Gilbert & Van Passel, Steven, 2017. "Young people’s acceptance of bioenergy and the influence of attitude strength on information provision," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 417-430.
    6. Abdul-Manan, Amir F.N. & Baharuddin, Azizan & Chang, Lee Wei, 2014. "A detailed survey of the palm and biodiesel industry landscape in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 931-941.
    7. Charlotte Stead & Zia Wadud & Chris Nash & Hu Li, 2019. "Introduction of Biodiesel to Rail Transport: Lessons from the Road Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Mahlia, T.M.I. & Syazmi, Z.A.H.S. & Mofijur, M. & Abas, A.E. Pg & Bilad, M.R. & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Silitonga, A.S., 2020. "Patent landscape review on biodiesel production: Technology updates," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    9. Gamborg, Christian & Anker, Helle Tegner & Sandøe, Peter, 2014. "Ethical and legal challenges in bioenergy governance: Coping with value disagreement and regulatory complexity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 326-333.
    10. Mahmudul, H.M. & Hagos, F.Y. & Mamat, R. & Adam, A. Abdul & Ishak, W.F.W. & Alenezi, R., 2017. "Production, characterization and performance of biodiesel as an alternative fuel in diesel engines – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 497-509.
    11. Lin, Lin & Cunshan, Zhou & Vittayapadung, Saritporn & Xiangqian, Shen & Mingdong, Dong, 2011. "Opportunities and challenges for biodiesel fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1020-1031, April.
    12. Ullah, Kifayat & Kumar Sharma, Vinod & Dhingra, Sunil & Braccio, Giacobbe & Ahmad, Mushtaq & Sofia, Sofia, 2015. "Assessing the lignocellulosic biomass resources potential in developing countries: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 682-698.
    13. Pandey, Vimal Chandra & Singh, Kripal & Singh, Jay Shankar & Kumar, Akhilesh & Singh, Bajrang & Singh, Rana P., 2012. "Jatropha curcas: A potential biofuel plant for sustainable environmental development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2870-2883.
    14. Tereza Svatoňová & David Herák & Abraham Kabutey, 2015. "Financial Profitability and Sensitivity Analysis of Palm Oil Plantation in Indonesia," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(4), pages 1365-1373.
    15. Silitonga, A.S. & Atabani, A.E. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Masjuki, H.H. & Badruddin, Irfan Anjum & Mekhilef, S., 2011. "A review on prospect of Jatropha curcas for biodiesel in Indonesia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3733-3756.
    16. Mofijur, M. & Atabani, A.E. & Masjuki, H.H. & Kalam, M.A. & Masum, B.M., 2013. "A study on the effects of promising edible and non-edible biodiesel feedstocks on engine performance and emissions production: A comparative evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 391-404.
    17. Azad, A.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Sharma, Subhash C. & Mofijur, M. & Bhuiya, M.M.K., 2016. "Prospects, feedstocks and challenges of biodiesel production from beauty leaf oil and castor oil: A nonedible oil sources in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 302-318.
    18. Bhuiya, M.M.K. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Ashwath, N. & Azad, A.K., 2016. "Prospects of 2nd generation biodiesel as a sustainable fuel—Part: 1 selection of feedstocks, oil extraction techniques and conversion technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1109-1128.
    19. Gan, Peck Yean & Li, Zhi Dong, 2014. "Econometric study on Malaysia׳s palm oil position in the world market to 2035," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 740-747.
    20. Shameer, P. Mohamed & Ramesh, K., 2018. "Assessment on the consequences of injection timing and injection pressure on combustion characteristics of sustainable biodiesel fuelled engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 45-61.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hukrgr:279365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtkrghu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.