IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gjagec/355799.html

How – and How Much? An Analysis of Major Conflict Lines Regarding the Transformation of German Animal Farming

Author

Listed:
  • von Gall , Philipp
  • Luy , Jörg
  • Köder, Moritz
  • von Meyer-Höfer, Marie

Abstract

Based on the concept of a 'future workshop', this paper contributes to the understanding of major conflict lines and future pathways for animal farming in Germany. Participants in the future workshop were tasked with outlining their ideal vision of the future of animal farming, focusing on both its mode and quantity. We found three different types of visions differing in their motivation, farming methods, and the scale of envisioned animal farming: ‘Higher Standards’ (V1), ‘System Change and Reduction’ (V2), ‘Alternatives to Animal Farming’ (V3). V1 seeks to secure the quantities of supply and demand of animal products in Germany with minor adjustments towards improved animal welfare and investments in resource-efficiency and climate friendliness. V2 advocates for comprehensive social and environmental systemic changes throughout the agri-food sector, with substantially fewer animals involved. V3 aims to replace animal farming, with plant-based and other alternatives, whenever and wherever possible. Our findings suggest that there is little ground for a societal consensus on a single future mode and scale of animal farming. Stakeholder dialogues and policy initiatives should therefore allow for different pathways while focusing on compromises in the near future. Short-term solutions may be acceptable to supporters of all three visions, however, achieving this requires reframing the debate from ‘securing the future of animal farming’ to ‘guiding the future of animal farming’, acknowledging the potential – albeit partly – replacement of animal farming by suitable alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • von Gall , Philipp & Luy , Jörg & Köder, Moritz & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie, . "How – and How Much? An Analysis of Major Conflict Lines Regarding the Transformation of German Animal Farming," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 73(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:355799
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355799/files/1318_von_Gall_et_al..pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Twine, 2021. "Emissions from Animal Agriculture—16.5% Is the New Minimum Figure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-8, June.
    2. Hölker, Sarah & Steinfath, Holmer & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & Spiller, Achim, . "Tierethische Intuitionen in Deutschland: Entwicklung eines Messinstrumentes zur Erfassung bereichsspezifischer Werte im Kontext der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(4).
    3. Timothy D. Searchinger & Stefan Wirsenius & Tim Beringer & Patrice Dumas, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Assessing the efficiency of changes in land use for mitigating climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 565(7740), pages 9-9, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pascal Grohmann & Diane Kapgen & Peter H. Feindt, 2025. "Co-designing policy mixes to overcome lock-ins towards sustainable agri-food systems: the case of the pig sector transformation in Brandenburg, Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(4), pages 2743-2758, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. von Gall, Philipp & Luy, Jörg & Köder, Moritz & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie, 2022. "How – and How Much? An Analysis of Options for a Transformation of German Animal Farming towards Sustainability," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329602, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Bullerdiek, Nils & Neuling, Ulf & Kaltschmitt, Martin, 2021. "A GHG reduction obligation for sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) in the EU and in Germany," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Liu, Biao & Wang, Jinman & Feng, Yu & Yang, Man & Mu, Jiayin, 2024. "Mitigating the disparities in carbon emission efficiency enhancement in China's coal resource-based cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    4. Suria Tarigan & Iput Pradiko & Nuzul H. Darlan & Yudha Kristanto, 2025. "Carbon Footprint Comparison of Rapeseed and Palm Oil: Impact of Land Use and Fertilizers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Li Yuan & Jing Xu & Binrui Feng, 2024. "Evaluation and Prediction of Carbon Storage in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau by Coupling the GMMOP and PLUS Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Henrik B. Møller & Peter Sørensen & Jørgen E. Olesen & Søren O. Petersen & Tavs Nyord & Sven G. Sommer, 2022. "Agricultural Biogas Production—Climate and Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Anjia Li & Xu Yin & Hui Wei, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of the Relationship Between Land Use Carbon Emissions and Ecosystem Service Value in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Róbert Csalódi & Tímea Czvetkó & Viktor Sebestyén & János Abonyi, 2022. "Sectoral Analysis of Energy Transition Paths and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Fanchao Kong & Kaixiao Zhang & Hengshu Fu & Lina Cui & Yang Li & Tengteng Wang, 2023. "Temporal–Spatial Variations and Convergence Analysis of Land Use Eco-Efficiency in the Urban Agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Jiali He & Xiangfei Liu & Xuetong Wang & Xueyang Li & Linger Yu & Beibei Niu, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Territorial Spaces and Its Effect on Carbon Emissions in Qingdao City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Cameryn Brock & Patrick R. Roehrdanz & Tim Beringer & Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer & Brian J. Enquist & Amy E. Frazier & Justin A. Johnson & Christina M. Kennedy & Joseph Kiesecker & Ashley E. Larsen & Rafa, 2026. "Balancing land use for conservation, agriculture, and renewable energy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Stefan Möckel, 2024. "The macroeconomic money-nature nexus: Are growing money supplies a relevant obstacle on the way to an ecologically sustainable global economy?," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-29, January.
    13. Sophie Saget & Marcela Costa & David Styles & Mike Williams, 2021. "Does Circular Reuse of Chickpea Cooking Water to Produce Vegan Mayonnaise Reduce Environmental Impact Compared with Egg Mayonnaise?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Mengmeng Zhang & Yi Tang & Junzhu Liu & Zhoupeng Chen & Qing Kang, 2025. "Increase or Decrease? The Impact of Land Development Rights Transfer on Regional Carbon Emission Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Shang, Hua & Jiang, Li & Kumar Mangla, Sachin & Pan, Xiongfeng & Song, Malin, 2024. "Examining the role of national governance capacity in building the global low-carbon agricultural supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Elena Tamburini & Mattias Gaglio & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano, 2020. "Is Bioenergy Truly Sustainable When Land-Use-Change (LUC) Emissions Are Accounted for? The Case-Study of Biogas from Agricultural Biomass in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Yabo Zhao & Shifa Ma & Jianhong Fan & Yunnan Cai, 2021. "Examining the Effects of Land Use on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Pearl River Delta," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Michael Kibet Kebenei & Dr. Fr. Paul Mathenge & Mr. Elias Mwangi, 2021. "Agripreneur Sustainability Strategies And Financial Performance Of Small-Scale Farmers In Uasin-Gishu County, Kenya," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 6(1), pages 30-55.
    19. Maurer, Rainer, 2023. "Comparing the effect of different agricultural land-use systems on biodiversity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Anna Kuczuk & Katarzyna Widera, 2021. "A Greater Share of Organic Agriculture in Relation to Food Security Resulting from the Energy Demand Obtained from Food—Scenarios for Poland until 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:355799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iahubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.