IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/350069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'industrie des semences, économie et politique

Author

Listed:
  • Berlan, Jean-Pierre

Abstract

The seed industry offers the opportunity to clarify the debates on the protection of a biological material, whether plants or microorganisms, and to bring them down from their metaphysical heights to an analytical ground. Two methods of protection have been implemented in the case of seeds : a biological way, the production of F1 hybrids, a legal and/or administrative, the breeders' rights legislation. The analytical framework developped in the article shows that heterosis or hybrid vigor is not the key variable to explain the choice of hybrid breeding and points out the multiplication rate of the species to be a more relevant variable. In the case of breeder's rights, it shows that the royalties which accrue to the breeder amount to a tax on seed producers. Consequently, breeder's rights appear to be both an inefficient and injust method of financing a breeding work. The case of the seed industry makes it possible to bring out the paradoxical nature of the specific factor of production involved in any biological process of production : the genetic information, which has no price in the two littéral meanings of the expression : an infinite and uncalculable value and no market value. Thus from an economic point of view, the attempts to patent microorganisms appear to promise much more drawbacks than advantages. Key words: Breeders'rights, hybrids, seed industry, patents protection of genetic material.

Suggested Citation

  • Berlan, Jean-Pierre, 1983. "L'industrie des semences, économie et politique," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 158.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:350069
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.350069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/350069/files/ecoru_0013-0559_1983_num_158_1_3007.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.350069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Arrow, 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 609-626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joly, Pierre-Benoît & Lemarié, Stéphane, 2000. "Cinquante ans d'innovation en agriculture: quelques enseignements des approches socio-économiques," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 255.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan Ngoc Vu & Duc Hong Vo & Michael McAleer, 2019. "Rent seeking for export licenses: Application to the Vietnam rice market," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2019-13, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    2. Antonio Tesoriere, 2021. "Drastic innovation reduces firms’ incentives to create divisions," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(3), pages 971-994, October.
    3. GianCarlo Moschini, 2004. "Intellectual Property Rights and the World Trade Organization: Retrospect and Prospects," Chapters, in: Giovanni Anania & Mary E.. Bohman & Colin A. Carter & Alex F. McCalla (ed.), Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO, chapter 19, pages 474-511, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Boldrin, Michele & Levine, David K., 2008. "Perfectly competitive innovation," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 435-453, April.
    5. Sakakibara, Mariko, 1997. "Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 447-473, December.
    6. Ghebrihiwet, Nahom, 2019. "FDI technology spillovers in the mining industry: Lessons from South Africa's mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 463-471.
    7. Aidt, Toke & Dutta, Jayasri & Sena, Vania, 2008. "Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 195-220, June.
    8. Todorova, Tamara, 2020. "Market Power and the Incentive to Innovate: A Return to Schumpeter and Arrow," EconStor Preprints 222573, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. F.C. Stam, 2019. "The Case against Non-Compete Agreements," Working Papers 19-20, Utrecht School of Economics.
    10. Vaziri, M., 2022. "Antitrust Law and Business Dynamism," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2243, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Ufuk Akcigit & Murat Celik & Daron Acemoglu, 2014. "Young, Restless and Creative: Openness to Disruption and Creative Innovations," 2014 Meeting Papers 377, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    12. Bitzer, Jürgen & Schröder, Philipp J.H., 2005. "The Impact of Entry and Competition by Open Source Software on Innovation," Working Papers 2005-12, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    13. Shiri M. Breznitz & Qiantao Zhang, 2020. "Determinants of graduates’ entrepreneurial activity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1039-1056, December.
    14. Dutta, Prajit K & Lach, Saul & Rustichini, Aldo, 1995. "Better Late Than Early: Vertical Differentiation in the Adoption of a New Technology," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(4), pages 563-589, Winter.
    15. Adam Wasilewski & Marcin Gospodarowicz, 2016. "Agri-Food Sector in Poland: The Need for Innovation Policy Support," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 5, pages 35-44.
    16. Jones, Charles I., 2005. "Growth and Ideas," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 16, pages 1063-1111, Elsevier.
    17. Marin,Giovanni & Marzucchi,Alberto & Zoboli,Roberto, 2014. "SMEs and Barriers to Eco-Innovation in EU: A Diverse Palette of Greens," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201404, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    18. Chrysanthi Balomenou & Aniko Kalman & Konstantinos Kolovos, 2014. "Comparative analysis of the implementation of Triple Helix Theory in Greece and Hungary and lessons learned from both cases´," ERSA conference papers ersa14p954, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Casey Rothschild & Florian Scheuer, 2016. "Optimal Taxation with Rent-Seeking," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(3), pages 1225-1262.
    20. Kaiser, Ulrich & Kongsted, Hans Christian & Rønde, Thomas, 2015. "Does the mobility of R&D labor increase innovation?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 91-105.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:350069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.