IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/401366.html

The impact of costs on the financial sustainability and efficiency of forestry enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Vasylishyn, Stanislav
  • Kantsedal, Nataliya
  • Leha, Olha
  • Tiutiunnyk, Svitlana
  • Tiutiunnyk, Yurii

Abstract

Purpose. The aim is to assess the impact of expenditures on the financial sustainability and efficiency of forestry enterprises and to develop scientifically based proposals that increase the transparency and reliability of cost accounting, as costs represent the substantial foundation of both tangible and intangible asset valuation in the context of sustainable forest resource management. Methodology. The methodological basis includes systemic, structural-functional, and statistical approaches to assessing financial and environmental sustainability. The research involves a quantitative analysis of economic indicators, trends, and the structure of expenditures of forestry enterprises. It also generalises the key factors influencing business performance under external challenges, particularly in the context of wartime conditions. Results. The study revealed an increasing impact of material expenditures on the performance indicators of forestry enterprises. Three key areas of insufficient informational support were identified: assessment of cost sustainability, opportunities for diversification, and the need for revised reporting formats. The authors propose the inclusion of a dedicated section in reporting documents that addresses the effects of military actions on economic activity. The necessity of synchronising managerial and statistical reporting with multi-level information systems is substantiated, in order to implement environmental initiatives and align with the national green taxonomy framework. Originality. For the first time: 1) the economic, environmental, and socio-organisational factors that undermine the sustainability of forestry enterprises during wartime have been systematised; 2) the feasibility of introducing a separate informational section in statistical reports specifically dedicated to war-related expenditures and losses has been substantiated. Improved: the theoretical and methodological approaches to the formation of financial, statistical, and managerial reporting of forestry sector enterprises, taking into account the requirements of sustainable development and the need to synchronise ecological, economic, and social management factors. Further developed: the study of the impact of expenditures on the financial sustainability and efficiency of the forestry sector, with a focus on the mechanisms through which cost structures influence profitability, investment capacity, and sustainable development outcomes. Practical implications. Reflected in the enhancement of management and accounting tools in the forestry sector. It is proposed to add a new section to the state statistical reporting form of Ukraine (Form 4-LG), which details war-related expenditures and losses. The results are of direct importance to government bodies, to forestry enterprises and to investors and international partners, who gain a more realistic assessment of the investment potential of the sector when economic, environmental, and social risks are considered. These improvements enable more accurate assessments of external threats, support the development of investment-attractive “green” projects, and strengthen enterprises’ environmental and financial accountability. The proposed approaches may also serve as a basis for developing indicators to monitor the effectiveness of sustainability policies in natural resource management.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasylishyn, Stanislav & Kantsedal, Nataliya & Leha, Olha & Tiutiunnyk, Svitlana & Tiutiunnyk, Yurii, 2026. "The impact of costs on the financial sustainability and efficiency of forestry enterprises," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 12(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401366
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.401366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/401366/files/4_Vasilyshin_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.401366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Furdychko, Orest & Drebot, Oksana & Palianychko, Nina & Dankevych, Stepan & Okabe, Yoshihiko, . "On the way to balance of forestry land use of Ukraine: ecological-and-economic aspect," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(4).
    2. Keshava Prasad Aryal & Nirmal Kumar Raut, 2024. "Cost Benefit Analysis of Silviculture-based Forest Management in Nepal," Journal of Forest Economics, now publishers, vol. 39(3), pages 287-306, November.
    3. Jonah Busch & Jacob J. Bukoski & Susan C. Cook-Patton & Bronson Griscom & David Kaczan & Matthew D. Potts & Yuanyuan Yi & Jeffrey R. Vincent, 2024. "Cost-effectiveness of natural forest regeneration and plantations for climate mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(9), pages 996-1002, September.
    4. Lovrić, Marko & Torralba, Mario & Orsi, Francesco & Pettenella, Davide & Mann, Carsten & Geneletti, Davide & Plieninger, Tobias & Primmer, Eeva & Hernandez-Morcillo, Monica & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark & , 2025. "Mind the income gap: Income from wood production exceed income from providing diverse ecosystem services from Europe’s forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yana Vodiak & Yurii Tsapko & Anatolii Kucher & Vitaliy Krupin & Iryna Skorokhod, 2022. "Influence of Growing Miscanthus x giganteus on Ecosystem Services of Chernozem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Yuwen Fu & Wang Li & Zheng Niu & Fang Chen & Bing Zhang & Hailang Qiao & Li Wang & Jens-Christian Svenning, 2026. "Enhanced forest carbon gains from stronger protection in China’s protected areas," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Leonardo Viotti & Luis Diego Herrera & Garo Batmanian & Franck Berthe & Rachael Kramp, 2026. "Conservation priority mapping to prevent zoonotic spillovers," Papers 2601.13349, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    4. Truffer, Oliver & Lieberherr, Eva & Van Ruymbeke, Kato & Chimisso, Costanza & Rowe, Tim & Vranken, Liesbet & Ohmura, Tamaki, 2025. "Mapping the research of Forest ecosystem Services in Europe: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Bostyn, Paul & Brunelle, Thierry, 2025. "Economic assessment of increasing tree cover in Kenya: The cost of maintaining forest contiguity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Lynn M. Riley & Susan C. Cook-Patton & Loren P. Albert & Christopher J. Still & Christopher A. Williams & Jacob J. Bukoski, 2025. "Accounting for albedo in carbon market protocols," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Tommaso Sonno & Davide Zufacchi, 2025. "Large-scale land acquisitions: Trees, trade and structural change," CEP Discussion Papers dp2075, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.