IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajosrd/342416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical efficiency of traditional agriculture based on local knowledge of smallholder farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Pattiasina, Trees Augustine
  • Nurmalina, Rita
  • Harianto
  • Fariyanti, Anna

Abstract

Increasing productivity is a challenge for small farmers in managing their farms. The objectives of this study were to analyze the technical efficiency of potato farming using local knowledge of traditional agriculture and to analyze the variables that contribute to the technical inefficiency of potato farming in the Arfak Mountains. This study was conducted in three districts of the Arfak Mountains Regency of West Papua Province: Anggi, Sururey, and Hingk. This study used cross-sectional data obtained from structured interviews with 140 farmers. The determinants and efficiency levels were estimated using stochastic frontier analysis. The findings of this study indicate that farmers who implement traditional farming systems with local knowledge have an average technical efficiency of 52%, equivalent to the average technical efficiency value of potatoes in other developing countries without local knowledge of 40–70 percent. The variables of extension frequency, total household income, degree of output commercialization, distance between the farmer’s house and the farm location, and fallow length are the determining factors for farmers' technical efficiency. The implication is that traditional farmers can improve their technical efficiency through technological improvements, the use of appropriate inputs, infrastructure improvements, intensive counseling, and assistance in correctly managing their farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Pattiasina, Trees Augustine & Nurmalina, Rita & Harianto & Fariyanti, Anna, 2023. "Technical efficiency of traditional agriculture based on local knowledge of smallholder farmers," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 13(03), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342416
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/342416/files/Technical%20efficiency%20of%20traditional%20agriculture%20based%20on%20local%20knowledge%20of%20smallholder%20farmers.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.342416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali M. Oumer & Amin Mugera & Michael Burton & Atakelty Hailu, 2022. "Technical efficiency and firm heterogeneity in stochastic frontier models: application to smallholder maize farms in Ethiopia," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 213-241, April.
    2. Widanage, Rupananda & Chan, Catherine & Tsanga, Yin-Phan & Sipes, Brent & Melakeberhan, Haddish & Sanchez-Perez, Amílcar & Mejía-Coroy, Alfredo, 2022. "Enhancing Technical Efficiency and Economic Welfare: A Case Study of Smallholder Potato Farming in the Western Highlands of Guatemala," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 24(1), February.
    3. Khanal, Uttam & Wilson, Clevo & Shankar, Sriram & Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Lee, Boon, 2018. "Farm performance analysis: Technical efficiencies and technology gaps of Nepalese farmers in different agro-ecological regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 645-653.
    4. Tirkaso, Wondmagegn & Hess, Sebastian, 2018. "Does commercialisation drive technical efficiency improvements in Ethiopian subsistence agriculture?," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(1), March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haixia Wu & Hantao Hao & Hongzhen Lei & Yan Ge & Hengtong Shi & Yan Song, 2021. "Farm Size, Risk Aversion and Overuse of Fertilizer: The Heterogeneity of Large-Scale and Small-Scale Wheat Farmers in Northern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Han Zhang & Dongli Wu, 2023. "The Impact of Agricultural Factor Inputs, Cooperative-Driven on Grain Production Costs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Huy, Hoang Trieu & Nguyen, Trung Thanh, 2019. "Cropland rental market and farm technical efficiency in rural Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 408-423.
    4. Jianxu Liu & Changrui Dong & Shutong Liu & Sanzidur Rahman & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2020. "Sources of Total-Factor Productivity and Efficiency Changes in China’s Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Sirak Bahta & Amos Omore & Darek Baker & Iheanacho Okike & Berhanu Gebremedhin & Francis Wanyoike, 2021. "An Analysis of Technical Efficiency in the Presence of Developments Toward Commercialization: Evidence from Tanzania’s Milk Producers," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 502-525, June.
    6. de Souza Filho, Hildo Meirelles & Carrer, Marcelo José & Saes, Maria Sylvia Macchione & Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Nicolella, Alexandre Chibebe, 2019. "Performance heterogeneity and strategic orientation: An analysis of small farmers of an agrarian reform project in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 23-30.
    7. Wondmagegn Tirkaso & Atakelty Hailu, 2022. "Does neighborhood matter? Spatial proximity and farmers’ technical efficiency," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(3), pages 374-386, May.
    8. Junhua Chen & Qiaochu Li & Peng Zhang & Xinyi Wang, 2024. "Does Technological Innovation Efficiency Improve the Growth of New Energy Enterprises? Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, February.
    9. Sabrina Auci & Donatella Vignani, 2020. "Climate variability and agriculture in Italy: a stochastic frontier analysis at the regional level," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(2), pages 381-409, July.
    10. T. O. Ojo & A. A. Ogundeji & S. C. Babu & T. Alimi, 2020. "Estimating financing gaps in rice production in Southwestern Nigeria," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Villano, Renato & Asante, Bright Owusu & Bravo-Ureta, Boris, 2019. "Farming systems and productivity gaps: Opportunities for improving smallholder performance in the Forest-Savannah transition zone of Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 220-227.
    12. Han Zhang & Dongli Wu, 2023. "The Impact of Rural Industrial Integration on Agricultural Green Productivity Based on the Contract Choice Perspective of Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Ito, Junichi & Li, Xinyi, 2023. "Interplay between China’s grain self-sufficiency policy shifts and interregional, intertemporal productivity differences," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Sirak Bahta & Amos Omore & Darek Baker & Iheanacho Okike & Berhanu Gebremedhin & Francis Wanyoike, 0. "An Analysis of Technical Efficiency in the Presence of Developments Toward Commercialization: Evidence from Tanzania’s Milk Producers," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesstea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.