IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/402801.html

Understanding Consumer Perceptions of Local Horticultural Products Using Factor Analysis in Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand, India

Author

Listed:
  • Chandra, Tara
  • Sanwal, Ravi

Abstract

This study examines consumer perceptions of locally produced horticultural products in the Kumaon region of Uttarakhand, with the objective of identifying key factors influencing their market acceptance and commercialization potential. A cross-sectional descriptive research design was adopted, and primary data were collected in May 2024 from major horticultural markets across six districts of Kumaon using a structured questionnaire. Out of 360 consumers approached through simple random sampling, 339 valid responses were analyzed using a five-point Likert scale. Reliability and sampling adequacy were confirmed through Cronbach’s Alpha, a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value of 0.826, and a significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity (p < 0.001). Exploratory Factor Analysis with Varimax rotation extracted two distinct components—Climate-Dependent Factors (nutritional quality, natural freshness, and flavor profile) and Human-Dependent Factors (market availability, price competitiveness, and product presentation)—which together explained 61.32% of the total variance. Climate-dependent attributes received comparatively higher satisfaction scores (mean range: 2.76–2.81), while human-dependent attributes were rated lower (mean range: 2.41–2.58). The findings indicate that while consumers highly value the intrinsic, climate-linked qualities of hill-grown horticultural products, gaps persist in market-managed attributes. The study concludes that targeted improvements in supply-chain efficiency, pricing mechanisms, and product presentation can significantly enhance the commercialization prospects of local horticultural products and support sustainable livelihood development in the Himalayan hill economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandra, Tara & Sanwal, Ravi, 2025. "Understanding Consumer Perceptions of Local Horticultural Products Using Factor Analysis in Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand, India," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 43(12).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:402801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/402801/files/Chandra43122025AJAEES150024.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayk Khachatryan & Alicia L. Rihn & Benjamin Campbell & Chengyan Yue & Charles Hall & Bridget Behe, 2017. "Visual Attention to Eco-Labels Predicts Consumer Preferences for Pollinator Friendly Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Élan R. Alford & Sam Hoadley & Caroline R. Fazzini & Laura K. Reilly & Amy Highland & Ellen C. Lake & Jeffrey A. Downing, 2022. "Applying United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Mt. Cuba Center Gardens with Native Plants and Grows Conservators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Kyriakos Riskos & Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & Naoum Mylonas & George Tsourvakas, 2021. "Ecolabels and the Attitude–Behavior Relationship towards Green Product Purchase: A Multiple Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Zhang, Xumin & Khachatryan, Hayk & Gao, Zhifeng, 2020. "Using Mixed Logit Based Models to Control Attribute Nonattendance in Choice Experiments," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304547, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Jerrod Penn & Wuyang Hu & Hannah J. Penn, 2019. "Support for Solitary Bee Conservation among the Public versus Beekeepers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 101(5), pages 1386-1400, October.
    5. Natália Munari Pagan & Karina Munari Pagan & Adriano Alves Teixeira & Janaina Moura Engracia Giraldi & Nelson Oliveira Stefanelli & Jorge Henrique Caldeira Oliveira, 2020. "Application of Neuroscience in the Area of Sustainability: Mapping the Territory," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(1), pages 61-77, June.
    6. Chavez, Daniel E. & Palma, Marco A. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., "undated". "When does real become consequential in non-hypothetical choice experiments?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274040, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Hayk Khachatryan & Alicia Rihn & Bridget Behe & Charles Hall & Ben Campbell & Jennifer Dennis & Chengyan Yue, 2018. "Visual attention, buying impulsiveness, and consumer behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 23-35, March.
    8. Bansal, Prateek & Kim, Eui-Jin & Ozdemir, Semra, 2024. "Discrete choice experiments with eye-tracking: How far we have come and ways forward," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Rihn, Alicia & Wei, Xuan & Khachatryan, Hayk, 2019. "Text vs. logo: Does eco-label format influence consumers’ visual attention and willingness-to-pay for fruit plants? An experimental auction approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Khachatryan, Hayk & Rihn, Alicia & Hansen, Gail & Clem, Taylor, 2020. "Landscape Aesthetics and Maintenance Perceptions: Assessing the Relationship between Homeowners’ Visual Attention and Landscape Care Knowledge," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:402801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.