IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afjecr/330376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective and objective measures of household resilience capacity in sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • d'Errico, Marco
  • Båsund, Karina Lisboa

Abstract

Resilience plays an essential role in sustaining and improving people’s livelihood during environmental changes. While several resilience measurements approaches have emerged, few studies compare the use of different resilience measurement tools. This paper addresses this gap by investigating how subjectively evaluated resilience measurements compare and relate to objective measurement tools. Using regionally representative household data of 24,516 households in 9 countries, we investigate whether the Subjective selfEvaluated Resilience Score (SERS) can act as a substitute to the objectively evaluated Resilience Capacity Index (RCI) estimated through the Resilience Index and Measurement Analysis (RIMA) approach. We further examine how these measures capture the effect of experiencing climate and socio-economic shocks on resilience. Finally, we investigate the determinants of these measures. We find that overall, the correlations between SERS and RCI are weak and not consistent across countries. Further, we find that while several determinants have the same direction and almost the same magnitude of effect for both SERS and RCI. However, the effect of having experienced past shocks on these resilience capacity measurements differs as SERS decreases whereas RCI increases. We therefore conclude that SERS and RCI are not substitutes, and that they may be capturing various and different aspects of resilience capacities. This is essential to consider when designing targeting criteria for resilience-building projects and ensuring proper measurement and evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • d'Errico, Marco & Båsund, Karina Lisboa, 2022. "Subjective and objective measures of household resilience capacity in sub-Saharan Africa," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 10(5), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:330376
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330376/files/237805-Article%20Text-573950-1-10-20221207.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindsey Jones, 2019. "Resilience isn't the same for all: Comparing subjective and objective approaches to resilience measurement," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Lindsey & d'Errico, Marco, 2019. "Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Sanchez, Mari & Lamont, Michèle & Zilberstein, Shira, 2022. "How American college students understand social resilience and navigate towards the future during covid and the movement for racial justice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Asif, Muhammad & Inam, Azhar & Adamowski, Jan & Shoaib, Muhammad & Tariq, Hisham & Ahmad, Shakil & Alizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Nazeer, Aftab, 2023. "Development of methods for the simplification of complex group built causal loop diagrams: A case study of the Rechna doab," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    4. Hisham Tariq & Chaminda Pathirage & Terrence Fernando & Noralfishah Sulaiman & Umber Nazir & Siti Kursiah Kamalia Abdul Latib & Haidaliza Masram, 2022. "Measuring Environmental Resilience Using Q-Methods: A Malaysian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Guoqing Shi & Yuanke Zhao & Xiaoya Mei & Dengcai Yan & Hubiao Zhang & Yuangang Xu & Yingping Dong, 2022. "Livelihood Resilience Perception: Gender Equalisation of Resettlers from Rural Reservoirs—Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:330376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajer/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.