IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v17y2013i4p87-95.html

Integrated Approach Model of Risk, Control and Auditing of Accounting Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Claudiu BRANDAS

  • Dan STIRBU

  • Otniel DIDRAGA

Abstract

The use of IT in the financial and accounting processes is growing fast and this leads to an increase in the research and professional concerns about the risks, control and audit of Ac-counting Information Systems (AIS). In this context, the risk and control of AIS approach is a central component of processes for IT audit, financial audit and IT Governance. Recent studies in the literature on the concepts of risk, control and auditing of AIS outline two approaches: (1) a professional approach in which we can fit ISA, COBIT, IT Risk, COSO and SOX, and (2) a research oriented approach in which we emphasize research on continuous auditing and fraud using information technology. Starting from the limits of existing approaches, our study is aimed to developing and testing an Integrated Approach Model of Risk, Control and Auditing of AIS on three cycles of business processes: purchases cycle, sales cycle and cash cycle in order to improve the efficiency of IT Governance, as well as ensuring integrity, reality, accuracy and availability of financial statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudiu BRANDAS & Dan STIRBU & Otniel DIDRAGA, 2013. "Integrated Approach Model of Risk, Control and Auditing of Accounting Information Systems," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(4), pages 87-95.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:17:y:2013:i:4:p:87-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistaie.ase.ro/content/68/08%20-%20Brandas,%20Stirbu,%20Didraga.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ion IVAN & Daniel MILODIN, 2010. "The Audit of the Application’s Management of the Structured Entities Orthogonality," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 145-151.
    2. Stoel, Dale & Havelka, Douglas & Merhout, Jeffrey W., 2012. "An analysis of attributes that impact information technology audit quality: A study of IT and financial audit practitioners," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 60-79.
    3. Anne E. Kleffner & Ryan B. Lee & Bill McGannon, 2003. "The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Use of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence From Canada," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 6(1), pages 53-73, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qasim Alawaqleh & Mahmoud Al-Sohaimat, 2017. "The Relationship between Accounting Information Systems and Making Investment Decisions in the Industrial Companies Listed in the Saudi Stock Market," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 199-211, June.
    2. Marco Benvenuto & Roxana Loredana Avram & Alexandru Avram & Carmine Viola, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of Corporate Governance Index on Financial Performance in the Romanian and Italian Banking Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maleen Z. Gong & Nava Subramaniam, 2020. "Principal leadership style and school performance: mediating roles of risk management culture and management control systems use in Australian schools," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2427-2466, September.
    2. Michael Maingot & Tony Quon & Daniel Zéghal, 2018. "Risk management by US and Canadian financial firms during the financial crisis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(4), pages 221-234, November.
    3. Li, Yueqi & Goel, Sanjay, 2025. "Bridging IT auditors and AI auditing: Understanding pathways to effective IT audits of AI-driven processes," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Al-Amri, Khalid & Davydov, Yevgeniy, 2016. "Testing the effectiveness of ERM: Evidence from operational losses," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 70-82.
    5. Axelsen, Micheal & Green, Peter & Ridley, Gail, 2017. "Explaining the information systems auditor role in the public sector financial audit," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 15-31.
    6. Mohammed Ali Ahmed Al-Sharafi & Shu Tong & Abdullah Aloqab, 2021. "The Effective Role of Internal Factors on Reconstructing Telecom Companies: The Case of Yemen Telecom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Hagigi, Moshe & Sivakumar, Kumar, 2009. "Managing diverse risks: An integrative framework," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 286-295, September.
    8. Mazurina Mohd Ali & Nur Shazwani Ab Hamid & Erlane K Ghani, 2019. "Examining the Relationship Between Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance in Malaysia," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 239-251, May.
    9. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Mohd Noor Azli, 2013. "A Study of Various Aspects of Internet Financial Reporting: A Case of Malaysian Auditors," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(6), pages 278-291.
    11. Muhammed Altuntas & Thomas R. Berry-Stölzle & J. David Cummins, 2021. "Enterprise risk management and economies of scale and scope: evidence from the German insurance industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 811-845, April.
    12. ŞENOL, Zekai & KARACA, Süleyman Serdar, 2017. "The Effect Of Enterprise Risk Management On Firm Performance: A Case Study On Turkey," Studii Financiare (Financial Studies), Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 21(2), pages 6-30.
    13. Rami Shaheen & Mehmet Ağa & Husam Rjoub & Ahmad Abualrub, 2020. "Investigation of the Pillars of Sustainability Risk Management as an Extension of Enterprise Risk Management on Palestinian Insurance Firms’ Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Huh, Bong Gu & Lee, Sunhwa & Kim, Wonsin, 2021. "The impact of the input level of information system audit on the audit quality: Korean evidence," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    15. Lidiia Karpenko & Iryna Chunytska & Nataliia Oliinyk & Nataliia Poprozman & Olha Bezkorovaina, 2020. "Consideration of Risk Factors in Corporate Property Portfolio Management," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Choi, Bongseok & Kim, Seon Tae, 2018. "Price volatility and risk management of oil and gas companies: Evidence from oil and gas project finance deals," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 594-605.
    17. Dionne, Georges & El Hraiki, Rayane & Mnasri, Mohamed, 2023. "Determinants and real effects of joint hedging: An empirical analysis of US oil and gas producers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    18. Leen Paape & Roland F. Spekl�, 2012. "The Adoption and Design of Enterprise Risk Management Practices: An Empirical Study," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 533-564, January.
    19. Hux, Candice T., 2017. "Use of specialists on audit engagements: A research synthesis and directions for future research," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 23-51.
    20. Steinbart, Paul John & Raschke, Robyn L. & Gal, Graham & Dilla, William N., 2018. "The influence of a good relationship between the internal audit and information security functions on information security outcomes," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 15-29.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:17:y:2013:i:4:p:87-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.