IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icafee/v5y2016p149-157.html

ITI (Integrated Territorial Investment) - A New Tool for Local Development Financing in the Programming Period 2014-2020

Author

Listed:
  • Georgiana Raluca Ladaru

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Florian Marin

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

The integration of the territoriality principle in the programming period 2014-2020 has validated the emergence of local development tools dedicated exclusively to some clearly outlined areas. One of these tools is the ITI. Romania chose to dedicate such a tool in the Danube Delta region. The importance of the research is linked to present a clear image of the framework in which Romania will implement ITI. Identifying the financial allocations in every operational program, correlation between operational programs, projects which will be submitted, the differences between the values of the projects and allocation are representing a clear contribution of the author. The main outcome is that the paper is that is proving that there is a difference between the vision of the implementation of ITI presented by local actors and the programming documents in terms of allocations. The paper is providing a characterization and highlighting, in a coherent way, the risks arising from Romania's decision to use such a tool and implement ITI in the Danube Delta region. The paper in considering the full set of operational programs and the planning documents promoted by local actors dedicated to the implementation of ITI.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgiana Raluca Ladaru & Florian Marin, 2016. "ITI (Integrated Territorial Investment) - A New Tool for Local Development Financing in the Programming Period 2014-2020," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 5, pages 149-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:5:y:2016:p:149-157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cafee.ase.ro/wp-content/upload/2016edition/file2016(17).pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Ron, 1999. "The New 'Geographical Turn' in Economics: Some Critical Reflections," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(1), pages 65-91, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mihaela PACESILA & Sofia-Elena COLESCA & Ruxandra-Irina POPESCU, 2022. "Toward Sustainable Development Through The Integrated Territorial Investments. An Overview Of The Literature In The Field," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(3), pages 32-44, December.
    2. Laura-Delia ANGHELUTA & Silvius STANCIU, 2020. "Integrated Territorial Investments - Current and Future Solutions for Sustainable Development," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 200-206.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 2010. "Economic Geographers and the Limelight: Institutions and Policy in the World Development Report 2009," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 86(4), pages 361-370, October.
    2. Miguel Atienza & Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo & Nicholas Phelps, 2019. "Bridges over troubled water? Journals, geographers and economists in the field of economy and space 1980–2017," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(8), pages 1800-1823, November.
    3. Michael F. Goodchild & Luc Anselin & Richard P. Appelbaum & Barbara Herr Harthorn, 2000. "Toward Spatially Integrated Social Science," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 23(2), pages 139-159, April.
    4. Edgar Morgenroth, 2003. "What should Policy Makers Learn from Recent Advances in Growth Theory and New Economic Geography?," Papers WP150, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    5. Chris van Egeraat & Edgar Morgenroth & Rutger Kroes & Declan Curran & Justin Gleeson, 2018. "A measure for identifying substantial geographic concentrations," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(2), pages 281-300, June.
    6. Dan O'Donoghue & Bill Gleave, 2004. "A Note on Methods for Measuring Industrial Agglomeration," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 419-427.
    7. Arbia, Giuseppe & Espa, Giuseppe & Giuliani, Diego & Dickson, Maria Michela, 2014. "Spatio-temporal clustering in the pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturing industry: A geographical micro-level analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 298-304.
    8. Christoph Grimpe & Roberto Patuelli, 2011. "Regional knowledge production in nanomaterials: a spatial filtering approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(3), pages 519-541, June.
    9. Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2005. "The emergence of technology systems: knowledge production and distribution in the case of the Emilian plastics district," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 29(1), pages 37-56, January.
    10. Deborah Fahy Bryceson & Katherine V. Gough & Jonathan Rigg & Jytte Agergaard, 2009. "Critical Commentary. The World Development Report 2009," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(4), pages 723-738, April.
    11. Ron A. Boschma & Anet B.R. Weterings, 2005. "The effect of regional differences on the performance of software firms in the Netherlands," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(5), pages 567-588, October.
    12. Ron Boschma & Floris Ledder, 2010. "The Evolution of the Banking Cluster of Amsterdam, 1850–1993: A Survival Analysis," Chapters, in: Dirk Fornahl & Sebastian Henn & Max-Peter Menzel (ed.), Emerging Clusters, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. repec:rri:wpaper:200605 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Ricardo Machado Ruiz, 2001. "Spatial economy: high-tech glossary or new regional economics?," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 11(1), pages 9-36, July.
    15. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8001 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2003. "The Governance of Technological Knowledge: Strategies, Processes and Public Policies," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 200306, University of Turin.
    17. Ottaviano, Gianmarco & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2004. "Agglomeration and economic geography," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 58, pages 2563-2608, Elsevier.
    18. Viego, Valentina, 2010. "Rendimientos crecientes, costos de transporte, eslabonamientos verticales y asimetrías regionales persistentes [Increasing returns, transport costs, vertical linkages and persistent regional inequalities]," MPRA Paper 26881, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Aug 2010.
    19. Sophie Webber, 2015. "Randomising Development: Geography, Economics and the Search for Scientific Rigour," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(1), pages 36-52, February.
    20. Gianmarco I P Ottaviano & Jacques-François Thisse, 2005. "New Economic Geography: What about the N?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(10), pages 1707-1725, October.
    21. Ron Boschma & Ron Martin, 2010. "The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    22. N. A. Phelps & R. J. Fallon & C. L. Williams, 2001. "Small Firms, Borrowed Size and the Urban-Rural Shift," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7), pages 613-624.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:5:y:2016:p:149-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elena Preda (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.