IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aerins/v2y2020i1p17-32.html

Attention Management

Author

Listed:
  • Elliot Lipnowski
  • Laurent Mathevet
  • Dong Wei

Abstract

Attention costs can cause some information to be ignored and decisions to be imperfect. Can we improve the material welfare of a rationally inattentive agent by restricting his information in the first place? In our model, a well-intentioned principal provides information to an agent for whom information is costly to process, but the principal does not internalize this cost. We show that full information is universally optimal if and only if the environment comprises one issue. With multiple issues, attention management becomes optimal: the principal restricts some information to induce the agent to pay attention to other aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Elliot Lipnowski & Laurent Mathevet & Dong Wei, 2020. "Attention Management," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 17-32, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:aea:aerins:v:2:y:2020:i:1:p:17-32
    DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20190165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aeri.20190165
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aeri.20190165.appx
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aeri.20190165.ds
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1257/aeri.20190165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charalambos D. Aliprantis & Kim C. Border, 2006. "Infinite Dimensional Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-29587-7, March.
    2. Harris, Christopher J, 1985. "Existence and Characterization of Perfect Equilibrium in Games of Perfect Information," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(3), pages 613-628, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duggan, John, 2017. "Existence of stationary bargaining equilibria," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 111-126.
    2. He, Wei & Sun, Yeneng, 2020. "Dynamic games with (almost) perfect information," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), May.
    3. Wei He & Yeneng Sun, 2015. "Dynamic Games with Almost Perfect Information," Papers 1503.08900, arXiv.org.
    4. P. Jean-Jacques Herings & Andrey Meshalkin & Arkadi Predtetchinski, 2020. "Optimality, Equilibrium, and Curb Sets in Decision Problems Without Commitment," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 478-492, June.
    5. Łukasz Balbus & Anna Jaśkiewicz & Andrzej S. Nowak, 2015. "Existence of Stationary Markov Perfect Equilibria in Stochastic Altruistic Growth Economies," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 295-315, April.
    6. He, Wei & Sun, Yeneng, 2015. "Dynamic Games with Almost Perfect Information," MPRA Paper 63345, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Campi, Luciano & Zabaljauregui, Diego, 2020. "Optimal market making under partial information with general intensities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104612, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. McCarthy, David & Mikkola, Kalle & Thomas, Teruji, 2020. "Utilitarianism with and without expected utility," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 77-113.
    9. Beißner, Patrick & Khan, M. Ali, 2019. "On Hurwicz–Nash equilibria of non-Bayesian games under incomplete information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 470-490.
    10. Corrao, Roberto & Fudenberg, Drew & Levine, David K., 2024. "On concave functions over lotteries," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    11. Subir K. Chakrabarti & Iryna Topolyan, 2016. "An extensive form-based proof of the existence of sequential equilibrium," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 4(2), pages 355-365, October.
    12. Christopher P. Chambers & Federico Echenique & Nicolas S. Lambert, 2021. "Recovering Preferences From Finite Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1633-1664, July.
    13. Demuynck, Thomas & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Saulle, Riccardo & Seel, Christian, 2018. "The Myopic Stable Set for Social Environments (RM/17/002-revised)," Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    14. Andrew Heunis, 2015. "Quadratic minimization with portfolio and terminal wealth constraints," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 243-282, May.
    15. Bajoori, Elnaz & Vermeulen, Dries, 2019. "Equilibrium selection in interdependent value auctions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 47-56.
    16. Chi, Yichun & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2020. "Optimal insurance with belief heterogeneity and incentive compatibility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 104-114.
    17. Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone & Dillenberger, David & Ortoleva, Pietro, 2020. "An explicit representation for disappointment aversion and other betweenness preferences," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(4), November.
    18. Askoura, Youcef & Billot, Antoine, 2021. "Social decision for a measure society," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    19. Cerreia-Vioglio, S. & Maccheroni, F. & Marinacci, M. & Rustichini, A., 2015. "The structure of variational preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 12-19.
    20. Bar Light, 2019. "General equilibrium in a heterogeneous-agent incomplete-market economy with many consumption goods and a risk-free bond," Papers 1906.06810, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:aerins:v:2:y:2020:i:1:p:17-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.