IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ach/journl/y2018id671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital innovative production on the basis of formation of an ecosystem of services and resources

Author

Listed:
  • T. O. Tolstykh
  • E. V. Shkarupeta
  • L. A. Gamidullayeva

Abstract

In article development of digital models of administrative, technological and logistic processes for the large industrial enterprises on the basis of formation of an ecosystem of virtual doubles (avatars) with application of the methods of industrial analytics (Big Data) allowing to transform the existing processes by criteria of chains of value added is considered. The novelty of the offered approach consists in development of the complete theory and practical mechanisms of transformation of administrative, technological and logistic processes at the level of the separate enterprises with use of the latest information technologies (processings of large volumes of information, foggy calculations, digital avatars, technologies a blockchain, etc.) that will provide cardinal change of business processes at the enterprises and technologies of preparation and decision-making. The cross-disciplinary character of the offered research has caused a problem of inclusion in a scientific turn of new sources, reconsiderations of development of a scientific thought, the principles and mechanisms and also regularities of economic development on micro, meso – macro – and megalevels of management. Within the further researches it is offered to develop mechanisms of realization and to support the initiatives of formation of pilot projects (testbet) for development of the concept of digital factory (plant) (clever factory, virtual factory) regarding interaction of technologies of digital design and modeling. Introduction of results of the offered research in practice of management will allow to provide the general growth of economic and innovative activity of the industrial enterprises, reduction of average duration of realization of life cycle of investment and innovative projects and also increase in their quality. The social importance of the planned results of the project consists in obtaining the accompanying social effects of their practical introduction which, first of all, consist in the predicted increase in level and quality of life of the population ofRussia.

Suggested Citation

  • T. O. Tolstykh & E. V. Shkarupeta & L. A. Gamidullayeva, 2018. "Digital innovative production on the basis of formation of an ecosystem of services and resources," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 11(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2018:id:671
    DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2018-2-159-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecoprom.misis.ru/jour/article/viewFile/671/612
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-2-159-168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matt, C. & Hess, Thomas & Benlian, Alexander, 2015. "Digital Transformation Strategies," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 75002, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Matt, C. & Hess, Thomas & Benlian, Alexander, 2015. "Digital Transformation Strategies," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 75202, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Christian Matt & Thomas Hess & Alexander Benlian, 2015. "Digital Transformation Strategies," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(5), pages 339-343, October.
    4. Hess, Thomas & Matt, Christian & Benlian, Alexander & Wiesböck, Florian, 2016. "Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 82423, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Hess, Thomas & Matt, Christian & Benlian, Alexander & Wiesböck, Florian, 2016. "Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 81032, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. T. O. Tolstykh & E. V. Shkarupeta, 2018. "To a question of development of the scenario of breakthrough development of the industrial enterprises in the conditions of the fourth industrial revolution," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 11(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    2. G. Denisse Chamochumbi D. & Massimo Ciambotti & Federica Palazzi & Francesca Sgr?, 2022. "The digital transformation process in the agri-food sector: A case study," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2 Suppl.), pages 43-70.
    3. Ander, Veronika & Cihelka, Petr & Tyrychtr, Jan & Novák, David, 2022. "Towards Compromise User Experience Design in Ambient Intelligent Environment," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(2), June.
    4. Roman Teichert, 2019. "Digital Transformation Maturity: A Systematic Review of Literature," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(6), pages 1673-1687.
    5. Wang, Sai & Wen, Wen & Niu, Yuhao & Li, Xin, 2024. "Digital transformation and corporate labor investment efficiency," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Elia, Gianluca & Solazzo, Gianluca & Lerro, Antonio & Pigni, Federico & Tucci, Christopher L., 2024. "The digital transformation canvas: A conceptual framework for leading the digital transformation process," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 381-398.
    7. Abdul Karim Feroz & Hangjung Zo & Ananth Chiravuri, 2021. "Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Xin Zhang & Yaoyu Xu & Liang Ma, 2022. "Research on Successful Factors and Influencing Mechanism of the Digital Transformation in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Fiona Maria Schweitzer & Matthias Handrich & Sven Heidenreich, 2019. "Digital Transformation In The New Product Development Process: The Role Of It-Enabled Plm Systems For Relational, Structural, And Npd Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(07), pages 1-34, October.
    10. Marino-Romero, Jorge Alberto & Palos-Sánchez, Pedro R. & Velicia-Martín, Félix, 2024. "Evolution of digital transformation in SMEs management through a bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Coskun-Setirek, Abide & Tanrikulu, Zuhal, 2021. "Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Chun-Liang Chen & Yao-Chin Lin & Wei-Hung Chen & Cheng-Fu Chao & Henry Pandia, 2021. "Role of Government to Enhance Digital Transformation in Small Service Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Changling Sun & Ziang Lin & Marek Vochozka & Zuzana Vincúrová, 2022. "Digital transformation and corporate cash holdings in China’s A-share listed companies," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1081-1116, December.
    14. Wolfgang Becker & Oliver Schmid, 2020. "The right digital strategy for your business: an empirical analysis of the design and implementation of digital strategies in SMEs and LSEs," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 985-1005, November.
    15. Saarikko, Ted & Westergren, Ulrika H. & Blomquist, Tomas, 2020. "Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 825-839.
    16. Liu, Chenyue & Rumánková, Lenka, 2022. "Are There the Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Manufacturing Export? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(2), June.
    17. Sascha Kraus & Paul Jones & Norbert Kailer & Alexandra Weinmann & Nuria Chaparro-Banegas & Norat Roig-Tierno, 2021. "Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    18. Siachou, Evangelia & Vrontis, Demetris & Trichina, Eleni, 2021. "Can traditional organizations be digitally transformed by themselves? The moderating role of absorptive capacity and strategic interdependence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 408-421.
    19. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2021. "Technology Acceptance and Leadership 4.0: A Quali-Quantitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Shaibu, Abdul-Fatawu & Shaibu, Mohammed Hardi, 2022. "Agricultural Aid and Growth in Sub Saharan Africa: a Review of Empirical Evidence," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(2), June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2018:id:671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Главный контакт редакции (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://misis.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.