IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acc/malfin/v33y2018i110p161-174.html

Structural Changes in Chinese Industrial Sector: Lessons for Emerging Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Mete Han Yağmur

    (İstanbul Tekni̇k University)

  • Gencay Karakaya

    (İstanbul Commerce University)

Abstract

After changing its closed economy structure in favor of an outward oriented economic growth model in 1978, China has demonstrated an outstanding growth performance during the past 40 years. When China first opened up its economy to international markets, thanks to abundant and cheap labor force it had, the country attracted vast amounts of foreign direct investment and enjoyed high growth rates. As China strategically directed the ensuing income into new capital formation and research and development activities, it transformed its industrial sector into a high technology manufacturer. Increased competitive power of Chinese manufacturers in international markets in return enabled China to maintain high growth rates. Analyzing the structural changes in Chinese industrial sector would provide useful lessons for countries that experience early de-industrialization such as India, and countries that are in the middle income trap, such as Turkey.

Suggested Citation

  • Mete Han Yağmur & Gencay Karakaya, 2018. "Structural Changes in Chinese Industrial Sector: Lessons for Emerging Economies," Journal of Finance Letters (Maliye ve Finans Yazıları), Maliye ve Finans Yazıları Yayıncılık Ltd. Şti., vol. 33(110), pages 161-174, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:acc:malfin:v:33:y:2018:i:110:p:161-174
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33203/mfy.451350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/571235
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33203/mfy.451350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Xiaohui & Buck, Trevor & Shu, Chang, 2005. "Chinese economic development, the next stage: outward FDI?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 97-115, February.
    2. Dani Rodrik, 2016. "Premature deindustrialization," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Sukti Dasgupta & Ajit Singh, 2006. "Manufacturing, Services and Premature Deindustrialization in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Analysis," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-49, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Gordon H. Hanson & Raymond Robertson, 2010. "China and the Manufacturing Exports of Other Developing Countries," NBER Chapters, in: China's Growing Role in World Trade, pages 137-159, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soumya Bhadury & Abhinav Narayanan & Bhanu Pratap, 2021. "Structural Transformation of Jobs from Manufacturing to Services: Will It Work for India?," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 15(1), pages 22-49, February.
    2. Mensah, Emmanuel B., 2020. "Is sub-Saharan Africa deindustrializing?," MERIT Working Papers 2020-045, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Imran Shah & Linyu He & Richard Hatfield & Mohamed Haroon, 2020. "Outward FDI: National and Regional Policy Implications for Technology Innovation," Department of Economics Working Papers 77/20, University of Bath, Department of Economics.
    4. Wilson Quijano & Diego Alejandro Guevara-Casta�eda, 2021. "Desindustrialización: evidencias desde una mirada kaldoriana para Colombia (2005-2017)," Ensayos de Economía 19342, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    5. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Simon Johnson, 2026. "Technology and Economic Development," NBER Working Papers 34730, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Andre Lorentz & Tommaso Ciarli & Maria Savona & Marco Valente, 2019. "Structural Transformations and Cumulative Causation: Towards an Evolutionary Micro-foundation of the Kaldorian Growth Model," Working Papers of BETA 2019-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    7. Armando J. Garcia Pires & José Pedro Pontes, 2021. "(De)Industrialization, Technology and Transportation," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 527-538, July.
    8. Yahya Z. ALSHEHHI & Jozsef POPP, 2017. "Sectoral Analysis: Growth Accounting Of Tertiary Industries," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 14, pages 221-230, August.
    9. Çakır, Muhammet Sait & Aydemir, Resul, 2022. "A Dutch disease approach into the premature deindustrialization," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    10. Ozge Kozal, 2024. "A Comparative Analysis on Ecological Footprint of Consumption and Import in Premature Deindustrialized Countries," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 87-109, December.
    11. Marija Beg & Martina Basarac Sertic & Ivo Druzic, 2017. "Determinants of Deindustrialisation in Developed European and Post-Communist Countries," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(2), pages 93-106.
    12. André Roncaglia De Carvalho & - André M. Marques, 2018. "Economic Development And Inflation: A Theoretical And Empirical Analysis," Anais do XLIV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 44th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 41, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    13. Bruno Ferreira Oliveira & Rodolfo Tomás Fonseca Nicolay, 2022. "Does innovative capacity affect the deindustrialization process? A panel data analysis," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-36, December.
    14. Haraguchi, Nobuya & Cheng, Charles Fang Chin & Smeets, Eveline, 2017. "The Importance of Manufacturing in Economic Development: Has This Changed?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 293-315.
    15. Itaman, Richard E. & Awopegba, Oluwafemi E., 2021. "Finance, oil rent and premature deindustrialisation in Nigeria," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 149-161.
    16. Maria Savona, 2021. "Revisiting High Development Theory to Explain Upgrading Prospects in Business Services Global Value Chains," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 206-226, April.
    17. Wallace P. Marcelino & Fabrício Missio & Frederico G. Jayme Jr, 2025. "Enhancing Industry-Modern Services Integration via Competitive Real Exchange Rates," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 680, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    18. R, Rekha & M, Suresh Babu, 2022. "Premature deindustrialisation and growth slowdowns in middle-income countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 377-389.
    19. Yazgan, Sekip & Marangoz, Cumali & Bulut, Emre, 2022. "The turning point of regional deindustrialization in the U.S.: Evidence from panel and time-series data," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 294-304.
    20. Mungase, Sachin & Nikam, Supriya & Kothe, Satyanarayan, 2024. "Structural Change and Labour Productivity in BRICS," MPRA Paper 121607, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acc:malfin:v:33:y:2018:i:110:p:161-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Süleyman Kale (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mfy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.