IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abw/journl/y2026id1281.html

Digital Business Transformation: Harmonizing Theory and Practice and Conceptualizing Platform-Based Approaches to Knowledge Management

Author

Listed:
  • Y. S. Matkovskaya

  • V. V. Kataev

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the problem of harmonizing theory and practice in the management of digital business transformation and to conceptualize platform-based approaches to knowledge management in this field. This objective determined the two-stage research design of the study. In the first stage, an in-depth analysis was conducted to assess how management solutions for digital business transformation are represented in Russian academic literature. Based on an empirical study of the contribution made by the academic community to addressing practical issues of digital business transformation, the authors identified the extent to which relevant research is represented in the literature and assessed the practical significance of its findings. Additionally, a comparative analysis of the views of Russian and foreign researchers was performed. This analysis revealed both the convergence of Russian and international perspectives on the development of digital business transformation theory and several points of differentiation. The study found that theoretical research cannot be fully developed without feedback from the business community, while business organizations require methodological support but are constrained by institutional limitations. After identifying the imbalance between theory and practice in digital business transformation and determining its causes, the second stage of the study focused on conceptualizing platform-based approaches to knowledge management in this area. Since the state is also a stakeholder in digitalization processes, the authors conceptualized the possibilities and prospects of applying a platform-based approach to the organization of cooperation between the academic and business communities in the field of digital business transformation. As a result, a configuration model of a platform ecosystem for interaction between the academic and business communities is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Y. S. Matkovskaya & V. V. Kataev, 2026. "Digital Business Transformation: Harmonizing Theory and Practice and Conceptualizing Platform-Based Approaches to Knowledge Management," Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, vol. 17(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:abw:journl:y:2026:id:1281
    DOI: 10.17747/2618-947X-2026-2-145-162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jsdrm.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1281/1231
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17747/2618-947X-2026-2-145-162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Etzkowitz, Henry & Webster, Andrew & Gebhardt, Christiane & Terra, Branca Regina Cantisano, 2000. "The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 313-330, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esteban Lafuente & Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2019. "Assessing the productivity of technology transfer offices: an analysis of the relevance of aspiration performance and portfolio complexity," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 778-801, June.
    2. Lander, Bryn & Atkinson-Grosjean, Janet, 2011. "Translational science and the hidden research system in universities and academic hospitals: A case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 537-544, February.
    3. Cornelia Lawson, 2016. "Putting the Region First: Knowledge Transfer at Universities in Greater Manchester," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: David Audretsch & Erik Lehmann & Michele Meoli & Silvio Vismara (ed.), University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 303-325, Springer.
    4. David Grosse Kathoefer & Jens Leker, 2012. "Knowledge transfer in academia: an exploratory study on the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 658-675, October.
    5. Serrano García, Jakeline & Acevedo Álvarez, Carlos Alberto & Castelblanco Gómez, Johnatan Mauricio & Arbeláez Toro, Juan José, 2017. "Measuring organizational capabilities for technological innovation through a fuzzy inference system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 93-109.
    6. Paola Giuri & Federico Munari & Martina Pasquini, 2013. "What Determines University Patent Commercialization? Empirical Evidence on the Role of IPR Ownership," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 488-502, July.
    7. Esther Hormiga & Petra Saá-Pérez & Nieves L. Díaz-Díaz & José Luis Ballesteros-Rodríguez & Inmaculada Aguiar-Diaz, 2017. "The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on the performance of academic research groups: the mediating role of knowledge sharing," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 10-32, February.
    8. Fabrizio Cesaroni & Andrea Piccaluga, 2016. "The activities of university knowledge transfer offices: towards the third mission in Italy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 753-777, August.
    9. van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Hessels, Laurens K., 2011. "Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 463-472, April.
    10. Bojun Hou & Kexin Fang & Xing Tang & Qingqiu Gan, 2026. "Optimizing pie distribution: exploring the interplay of labor costs and university-industry collaboration," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 2034-2063, June.
    11. Gál, Zoltán & Ptáček, Pavel, 2010. "The role of mid-range universities in knowledge transfer: the case of non-metropolitan regions in Central and Eastern Europe (examples from Hungary and the Czech Republic)," MPRA Paper 28358, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Jan 2011.
    12. Martin Meyer & Sujit Bhattacharya, 2004. "Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 61(3), pages 443-456, November.
    13. David J. Miller & Zoltan J. Acs, 2013. "Backing the horse or the jockey? University knowledge commercialization in the entrepreneurial age," Chapters, in: Tüzin Baycan (ed.), Knowledge Commercialization and Valorization in Regional Economic Development, chapter 2, pages 23-45, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Kim, Younghwan & Kim, Wonjoon & Yang, Taeyong, 2012. "The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from the U.S," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 154-166.
    15. Jose M. Sallan & Oriol Lordan, 2025. "University technology transfer: leveraging experiential learning and TTO’s resources," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 221-237, January.
    16. Erwan Lamy & Nadine Levratto, 2004. "L’hypothèse de la triple hélice dans le dispositif français d’innovation : L’hypothèse de la triple hélice dans le dispositif français d’innovation : le cas de l'Auvergne," Industrial Organization 0406009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Dong Liu & Yu Peng Zhu, 2023. "Evolution of Knowledge Structure in an Emerging Field Based on a Triple Helix Model: the Case of Smart Factory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4583-4607, December.
    18. Zoltan Gal, 2012. "The Role of Mid-Ranged Universities in Knowledge Transfer in Central and Eastern Europe - Sustainable University Strategies in the Era of Post-Mass Education, UDK 378. 4 : 001. 92," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 1(1), pages 50-70, June.
    19. Arho Suominen & Matthias Deschryvere, 2024. "Barriers to immaterial property rights development in research organizations: an explorative study from Finland," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1935-1958, October.
    20. Devrim Goktepe, 2003. "The Triple Helix as a model to analyze Israeli Magnet Program and lessons for late-developing countries like Turkey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(2), pages 219-239, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abw:journl:y:2026:id:1281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ООО Ð˜Ð·Ð´Ð°Ñ‚ÐµÐ»ÑŒÑ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ дом Â«Ð ÐµÐ°Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ð°Ñ Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸ÐºÐ°Â» (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.jsdrm.ru/jour/about/journalSponsorship .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.