IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abk/jajeba/ajebasp.2011.444.449.html

Investigating Individuals' Intention to be Involved in Knowledge Management Process

Author

Listed:
  • M. J.M. Razi
  • N. S.A. Karim

Abstract

Problem statement: Implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) process in organizations is considered as essential to be competitive in the present competitive world. Though the modern KM practices highly depend on technology, individuals (‘organizational members’) intention to be involved in KM process plays a major role in the success. Hence, the evaluation of individuals’ intention is deemed as significant before the actual implementation of KM process in organizations. Nevertheless, inadequate information is presented in this regard; as a result, a wide research gap prevails in the literature. In this context, the present study focuses on developing a research frame work that can be used to measure the individual intention to be involved in KM process. Approach: Subsequent to a critical analysis of the research gaps, a basic research model has been developed based on knowledge creation theory, KM enablers, and individual acceptance model. Measurers and questionnaire items were identified for each variable from relevant literature. Consequently, the reliability of the instrument was tested among academic staff of a Malaysian university. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha for each variable is more than 0.800 that exhibits the reliability of the instruments. Conclusion: The presented research framework might be a doorstep for future study in this area of KM. Moreover, practitioners may use the proposed framework to measure the intention of individuals to be involved in KM process before actually embarking to it. However, the framework and the model should be tested in different socio cultural and organizational climate to make it robust.

Suggested Citation

  • M. J.M. Razi & N. S.A. Karim, 2011. "Investigating Individuals' Intention to be Involved in Knowledge Management Process," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(3), pages 444-449, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2011.444.449
    DOI: 10.3844/ajebasp.2011.444.449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/pdf/ajebasp.2011.444.449.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://thescipub.com/abstract/ajebasp.2011.444.449
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.444.449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsiu‐Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 315-332, June.
    2. Nonaka, Ikujiro & Byosiere, Philippe & Borucki, Chester C. & Konno, Noboru, 1994. "Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 337-351, December.
    3. Hsiu-Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(1), pages 315 - 332, April.
    4. Akbar Nabiollahi & Rose Alinda Alias & Shamsul Sahibuddin, 2011. "Involvement of Service Knowledge Management System in Integration of ITIL V3 and Enterprise Architecture," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 165-170, January.
    5. Roxanne Helm Stevens & Joshua Millage & Sondra Clark, 2010. "Waves of Knowledge Management: The Flow between Explicit and Tacit Knowledge," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 2(1), pages 129-135, March.
    6. Nasrin Dastranj Mamaghani & Reza Samizadeh & Fatemeh Saghafi, 2011. "Evaluating the Readiness of Iranian Research Centers in Knowledge Management," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 203-212, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayande Alpha & Sabourin Vincent, 2011. "Strategy Execution: An Empirical Analysis of Obstacles Faced by Master of Business Administration Executive Students," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(3), pages 511-524, October.
    2. Laila Naif Marouf & Naresh Kumar Agarwal, 2016. "Are Faculty Members Ready? Individual Factors Affecting Knowledge Management Readiness in Universities," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-28, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej Zastempowski & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Krzysztof Krukowski & Szymon Cyfert, 2020. "Technological Innovation Capabilities of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 460-474.
    2. Agnieszka Bitkowska, 2020. "The relationship between Business Process Management and Knowledge Management - selected aspects from a study of companies in Poland," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 16(1), pages 169-193.
    3. Lingyan Liu & Minghua Lin & Ming Yu, 2023. "Relationship of internal institutions, knowledge sharing, and technological innovation in characteristic cultural enterprises: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 515-524, January.
    4. Quan Anh Nguyen & Gillian Sullivan Mort, 0. "Conceptualising organisational-level and microfoundational capabilities: an integrated view of born-globals’ internationalisation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    5. Xingshan Zheng & Lan Li & Fangyu Zhang & Mengyuan Zhu, 2019. "The Roles of Power Distance Orientation and Perceived Insider Status in the Subordinates’ Moqi with Supervisors and Sustainable Knowledge-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Derya Findik & Berna Beyhan, 2017. "A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from Turkey," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing among Employees in Organizations," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 8(1), pages 52-61, March.
    8. Aftab Alam, Muhammad & Rooney, David & Taylor, Murray, 2022. "Measuring Inter-Firm Openness in Innovation Ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 436-456.
    9. XiaoJuan Zhang & Xiang Jinpeng & Farhan Khan, 2020. "The Influence of Social Media on Employee’s Knowledge Sharing Motivation: A Two-Factor Theory Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    10. Wondifraw Mihret Dessie & Gojjam Ademe Mengistu & Tigist Abera Mulualem, 2022. "Communication and innovation in the performance of weaving and pottery crafts in Gojjam, Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Mihaela Enache-Zegheru & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2020. "Linking Perceived Organizational Support, Affective Commitment, and Knowledge Sharing with Prosocial Organizational Behavior of Altruism and Civic Virtue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Minerva Martínez Avila & Juan José García-Machado & Eréndira Fierro Moreno, 2021. "A Multiple Full Mediating Effect in a PLS Hierarchical Component Model: Application to the Collaborative Public Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Wuryanti Kuncoro & Fajar Nugroho Adi & Bedjo Santoso, 2022. "The Model of Human Resources Performance Development on the Leader Organization of Regional Devices at Salatiga Government," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 1-8, July.
    14. Tyrone T. Lin & Yu-Qi Yeh & Shu-Yen Hsu, 2022. "Analysis of the Effects of Perceived Value, Price Sensitivity, Word-of-Mouth, and Customer Satisfaction on Repurchase Intentions of Safety Shoes under the Consideration of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Fındık, Derya & Beyhan, Berna, 2014. "A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Micro Level Evidence from Turkey," MPRA Paper 60961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Lynus Ekuwam Ebenyo Nakiporo, Kris M. Y. Law, 2025. "The Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Public Healthcare Delivery Strategy: A Case Study in Kenya," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, ToKnowPress, vol. 14, pages 67-77.
    17. Wei Daojiang & Li Huimin, 2014. "An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Knowledge Sharing in Project Context," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 154-169, April.
    18. Martínez-Caro, Eva & Cegarra-Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Alfonso-Ruiz, Francisco Javier, 2020. "Digital technologies and firm performance: The role of digital organisational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Nham Tuan Phong & Nguyen Tuyet-Mai & Tran Nam Hoai & Nguyen Hao Anh, 2020. "Knowledge sharing and innovation capability at both individual and organizational levels: An empirical study from Vietnam’s telecommunication companies," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 275-301, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2011.444.449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jeffery Daniels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thescipub.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.