IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v30y2026i21743.html

What Makes a Systematic Literature Review Worth Publishing? Protocol, Transparency, and Critical Synthesis in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Cristiana Cerqueira Leal
  • Paula Chimenti

Abstract

Over the past year, RAC has received a substantial number of systematic literature review submissions, the majority of which were rejected at the desk review stage. This pattern is not incidental. It reveals a persistent gap between what authors believe constitutes a publishable literature review and what journals expect from such contributions. While systematic reviews have become increasingly common, their growing presence has not been accompanied by a proportional increase in conceptual contribution or theoretical advancement...

Suggested Citation

  • Cristiana Cerqueira Leal & Paula Chimenti, 2026. "What Makes a Systematic Literature Review Worth Publishing? Protocol, Transparency, and Critical Synthesis in the Age of Artificial Intelligence," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 30(Vol. 30 N), pages 260192-2601.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:30:y:2026:i:2:1743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1743
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1743/2243
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:30:y:2026:i:2:1743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.