IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0311003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality assessment and umbrella review of systematic reviews about dance for people with Parkinson’s disease

Author

Listed:
  • Camila Pinto
  • Rafaela Simon Myra
  • Alexandre Severo do Pinho
  • Francisca Pereira
  • Guido Orgs
  • Aline Souza Pagnussat

Abstract

Objective(s): To determine (1) the quality of systematic reviews about dance-based intervention in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and (2) standard evidence for dance-based intervention efficacy based on the categories of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) from the World Health Organization’s (WHO). Methods: The data source included MEDLINE, PUBMED, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), CINAHL, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, APA PsycNet (APA PsycINFO), LILACS, SciELO, and AMED. Pairs of independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of eligible studies by using the software Covidence. Criteria included: systematic review designs; individuals with PD; dance-based interventions aimed to change critical PD symptoms matched to IFC domains (body functions, activities, and participation). Independent reviewers extracted information regarding the characteristics of all systematic reviews included and appraised quality using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2). Randomized controlled trials and their risk of bias were identified within each review and were used to perform an updated pairwise meta-analysis. Results: Of the 571 manuscripts screened, 55 reviews met the inclusion criteria. The overall confidence in the results of 38 reviews (69%) was rated as ’critically low,’ nine (9%) as ’low,’ one (2%) as ’moderate,’ while seven of 55 reviews (13%) were rated as ’high’. Dance associated with pharmacological usual care is better than pharmacological usual care alone for essential components of ICF, such as motor symptoms severity (body function), depressive symptoms (body function), balance (body function and activity), and functional mobility (activity), but not for gait distance (activity) and quality of life (participation). Dance is also superior to multimodal exercise to improve balance. Conclusions: Clinicians and people with PD can refer to this paper for a summary of high-quality reviews and the overall evidence supporting dance as an adjunct rehabilitation. This umbrella review not only underscores the therapeutic potential of dance but also reinforces the use of arts-based approaches into healthcare practices for people with neurological conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Camila Pinto & Rafaela Simon Myra & Alexandre Severo do Pinho & Francisca Pereira & Guido Orgs & Aline Souza Pagnussat, 2024. "Quality assessment and umbrella review of systematic reviews about dance for people with Parkinson’s disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-41, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311003
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311003&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0311003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilda Bastian & Paul Glasziou & Iain Chalmers, 2010. "Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-6, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arjun K Reddy & Jared T Scott & Grayson R Norris & Chip Moore & Jake X Checketts & Griffin K Hughes & Travis Small & Mark M Calder & Brent L Norris, 2023. "Cemented vs Uncemented hemiarthroplasties for femoral neck fractures: An overlapping systematic review and evidence appraisal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Dreesens, Dunja & Kremer, Leontien & Burgers, Jako & van der Weijden, Trudy, 2020. "Lost in definitions: Reducing duplication and clarifying definitions of knowledge and decision support tools. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 531-539.
    3. Blake M. Louscher & Veerasathpurush Allareddy & Satheesh Elangovan, 2019. "Predictors of Citations of Systematic Reviews in Oral Implantology: A Cross-Sectional Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    4. Hansen, Henrik & Trifkovic, Neda, 2013. "Systematic Reviews: Questions, Methods and Usage," MPRA Paper 47993, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Mark J Bolland & Andrew Grey, 2014. "A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Shi, Xuanyu & Du, Jian, 2022. "Distinguishing transformative from incremental clinical evidence: A classifier of clinical research using textual features from abstracts and citing sentences," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    7. Jason Portenoy & Jevin D. West, 2020. "Constructing and evaluating automated literature review systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 3233-3251, December.
    8. Dreesens, Dunja & Kremer, Leontien & van der Weijden, Trudy, 2019. "The Dutch chaos case: A scoping review of knowledge and decision support tools available to clinicians in the Netherlands," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1288-1297.
    9. Joerg J Meerpohl & Florian Herrle & Gerd Antes & Erik von Elm, 2012. "Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-5, May.
    10. Lucy Turner & James Galipeau & Chantelle Garritty & Eric Manheimer & L Susan Wieland & Fatemeh Yazdi & David Moher, 2013. "An Evaluation of Epidemiological and Reporting Characteristics of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Systematic Reviews (SRs)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    11. K. M. Saif‐Ur‐Rahman & Md. Hasan & Shahed Hossain & Iqbal Anwar & Yoshihisa Hirakawa & Hiroshi Yatsuya, 2022. "Prioritization and sequential exclusion of articles in systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    12. Monique Heijmans & Rune Poortvliet & Marieke Van der Gaag & Ana I. González-González & Jessica Beltran Puerta & Carlos Canelo-Aybar & Claudia Valli & Marta Ballester & Claudio Rocha & Montserrat León , 2022. "Using a Taxonomy to Systematically Identify and Describe Self-Management Interventions Components in Randomized Trials for COPD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    13. repec:plo:pone00:0086277 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Tanja Burgard & Holger Steinmetz, 2023. "Evidence in management science related to psychology: benefits, tools, and an example of a community-augmented meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1135-1150, September.
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0125208 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:plo:pone00:0023051 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Laura Sheble, 2017. "Macro‐level diffusion of a methodological knowledge innovation: Research synthesis methods, 1972–2011," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2693-2708, December.
    18. Md Mahbub Hossain & Abida Sultana & Samia Tasnim & Qiping Fan & Ping Ma & E Lisako J McKyer & Neetu Purohit, 2020. "Prevalence of mental disorders among people who are homeless: An umbrella review," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(6), pages 528-541, September.
    19. Costa, King & Ntsobi, Mfanelo Patrick, 2023. "A Systematic Review of the Potential for Promotion of Southern Epistemologies in Educational Research: Ubuntu Philosophy as a Research Paradigm, a Conceptual Model," AfricArxiv qshp8, Center for Open Science.
    20. Means, Stephanie N. & Magura, Stephen & Burkhardt, Jason T. & Schröter, Daniela C. & Coryn, Chris L.S., 2015. "Comparing rating paradigms for evidence-based program registers in behavioral health: Evidentiary criteria and implications for assessing programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 100-116.
    21. Porjai Pattanittum & Malinee Laopaiboon & David Moher & Pisake Lumbiganon & Chetta Ngamjarus, 2012. "A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identifying Out-of-Date Systematic Reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-6, November.
    22. Gillian L Currie & Helena N Angel-Scott & Lesley Colvin & Fala Cramond & Kaitlyn Hair & Laila Khandoker & Jing Liao & Malcolm Macleod & Sarah K McCann & Rosie Morland & Nicki Sherratt & Robert Stewart, 2019. "Animal models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A machine-assisted systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-34, May.
    23. Melanie Lum & Luke Wolfenden & Jannah Jones & Alice Grady & Hayley Christian & Kathryn Reilly & Sze Lin Yoong, 2022. "Interventions to Improve Child Physical Activity in the Early Childhood Education and Care Setting: An Umbrella Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0311003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.