IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aan/journl/v6y2024i2p180-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“The Magnificent Seven” Technology Stocks and Their Impact on the S&P 500: A Review 4 Years Later

Author

Listed:
  • Dimiter Nenkov

    (Department of Finance, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Purpose: The subject of this research is the performance of the S&P 500 and the influence of the large technology stocks on it. The interest to this issue is provoked by the continued record-breaking process in the levels of the US stock market. The purpose of the study is to find out: whether recent growth of the index and of the seven large companies (Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Nvidia è Tesla) is supported or not by the key financial indicators, and to what extent the index indicators are influenced by the seven large technology stocks. Design/Methodology/Approach: The current study is a kind of a relook - four years later, of the same issues, explored by the author during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Historical performance of the S&P 500 is reviewed, using its key financial indicators, such as EPS, EPS growth, ROE, as well as “price-to-earnings” (PE) and “price-to-book” (PBV) market ratios. The performance of the seven large technology stocks (Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Nvidia and Tesla) is reviewed in parallel. Findings: The elaborate comparative analysis of the above set of fundamental indicators does not seem to support the high current levels of the S&P 500 as a whole and of most of the companies from “The Magnificent Seven”. The major doubt comes because of the unreasonably high levels of most reported PE and PBV ratios, as compared with historic average levels for the market. At the end, fundamental PE and PBV ratios are also derived and compared with the actual market PEs and PBVs of the index and of the seven companies. The derived fundamental PE and PBV ratios also do not support the high levels of the S&P 500 as a whole, and the prices of most of “The Magnificent Seven” technology stocks. Practical Implications: The important implications for investors are that the S&P 500 as a whole and most of “The Magnificent Seven” stocks look significantly overpriced at the background of fundamentals in 2024. Originality/Value: The analyses of this type are normally of private character, done mainly within business entities, specialized on financial markets. Academic research of this matter, which is publicly available, and following the approach of the current study, is extremely limited. Paper Type: Research Paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimiter Nenkov, 2024. "“The Magnificent Seven” Technology Stocks and Their Impact on the S&P 500: A Review 4 Years Later," Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, University of National and World Economy, Institute for Economics and Politics, vol. 6(2), pages 180-195, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:6:y:2024:i:2:p:180-195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/FABA/2024.2/FABA.2024.2.07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J. Shiller, 2015. "Irrational Exuberance," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 3, number 10421.
    2. Franck Bancel & Usha R. Mittoo, 2014. "The Gap between the Theory and Practice of Corporate Valuation: Survey of European Experts[We are ext]," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 26(4), pages 106-117, December.
    3. Jerald E. Pinto & Thomas R. Robinson & John D. Stowe, 2019. "Equity valuation: A survey of professional practice," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 219-233, April.
    4. Robert J. Shiller, 2012. "Finance and the Good Society," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9652.
    5. Emanuel Bagna & Enrico Cotta Ramusino, 2017. "Market Multiples and the Valuation of Cyclical Companies," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(12), pages 246-266, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimiter Nenkov, 2021. "The S&P 500 Current Record-High Levels against Fundamental PE and PBV Ratios," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 8, pages 93-113.
    2. Olbert, Lars, 2024. "Identifying gaps between research results and education," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Syed Babar Ali & Manzoor A.Khalidi, 2020. "Valuation of Equity Securities, Private Firms, and Startups," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 16(1), pages 16-19.
    4. Yuchao Fan, 2022. "Dissecting the dot-com bubble in the 1990s NASDAQ," Papers 2206.14130, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    5. Ronald Nhleko & Daniel Schutte, 2024. "A Panel Analysis of the Impact of EBITDA, Equity Book Values, Growth, Risk and Negative Earnings on Share Price Variations," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    6. Syed Babar Ali & Manzoor A.Khalidi, 2020. "Valuation of Equity Securities, Private Firms, and Startups," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 16(1), pages 125-140.
    7. Daisuke Ikeda & Toan Phan & Timothy Sablik, 2020. "Asset Bubbles and Global Imbalances," Richmond Fed Economic Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 20, pages 1-4, January.
    8. Joshua Schwartzstein & Adi Sunderam, 2021. "Using Models to Persuade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(1), pages 276-323, January.
    9. Detzer, Daniel & Herr, Hansjörg, 2014. "Theories of financial crises: An overview," IPE Working Papers 32/2014, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    10. Michel Dacorogna & Juan-José Francisco Miguelez & Marie Kratz, 2016. "Risk neutral versus real-world distribution on puclicly listed bank corporations," Working Papers hal-01373071, HAL.
    11. Li, Chong, 2017. "Log-periodic view on critical dates of the Chinese stock market bubbles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 305-311.
    12. J. Zhu & L. Zhang, 2023. "Educational Game on Cryptocurrency Investment: Using Microeconomic Decision-Making to Understand Macroeconomics Principles," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 262-272, April.
    13. Artak Harutyunyan & Mr. Alexander Massara & Giovanni Ugazio & Goran Amidžic & Richard Walton, 2015. "Shedding Light on Shadow Banking," IMF Working Papers 2015/001, International Monetary Fund.
    14. Karel Janda, 2019. "Earnings Stability and Peer Company Selection for Multiple Based Indirect Valuation," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 37-75, February.
    15. Ignacio J. Martinez-Moyano & David P. McCaffrey & Rogelio Oliva, 2014. "Drift and Adjustment in Organizational Rule Compliance: Explaining the “Regulatory Pendulum” in Financial Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 321-338, April.
    16. Arısoy, Yakup Eser & Altay-Salih, Aslıhan & Akdeniz, Levent, 2015. "Aggregate volatility expectations and threshold CAPM," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 231-253.
    17. Chavas, Jean-Paul & Li, Jian & Wang, Linjie, 2024. "Option pricing revisited: The role of price volatility and dynamics," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    18. Lepinteur, Anthony & Waltl, Sofie R., 2020. "Tracking Owners' Sentiments: Subjective Home Values, Expectations and House Price Dynamics," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 299, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    19. Kwangwon Ahn & Hanwool Jang & Minhyuk Jeong & Sungbin Sohn, 2025. "The impact of futures trade on the informational efficiency of the U.S. REIT market," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Brice Corgnet & Mark Desantis & David Porter, 2018. "What Makes a Good Trader? On the Role of Intuition and Reflection on Trader Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 73(3), pages 1113-1137, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    stock market; S&P 500; the magnificent seven technology stocks; EPS growth; ROE; PE and PBV ratios; fundamental PE and PBV;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:6:y:2024:i:2:p:180-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yanko Hristozov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienwebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.