Framing as Path-Dependence
AbstractA “framing” effect occurs when an agent’s choices are not invariant under changes in the way a choice problem is formulated, e.g. changes in the way the options are described (violation of description invariance) or in the way preferences are elicited (violation of procedure invariance). In this paper we examine precisely which classical conditions of rationality it is whose non-satisfaction may lead to framing effects. We show that (under certain conditions), if (and only if) an agent's initial dispositions on a set of propositions are “implicitly inconsistent”, her decisions may be “path-dependent”, i.e. dependent on the order in which the propositions are considered. We suggest that different ways of framing a choice problem may induce the order in which relevant propositions are considered and hence affect the decision made. This theoretical explanation suggests some observations about human psychology which are consistent with those made by psychologists and provides a unified framework for explaining violations of description and procedure invariance.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by EconWPA in its series Microeconomics with number 0211016.
Length: 18 pages
Date of creation: 21 Nov 2002
Date of revision:
Note: Type of Document - PDF; prepared on Windows; pages: 18. Oxford University Department of Economics Series Ref: 124
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://18.104.22.168
framing; preference reversal; path-dependence; rationality; deductive closure;
Other versions of this item:
- D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
- D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2002-11-28 (All new papers)
- NEP-CBE-2002-11-28 (Cognitive & Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-EVO-2002-11-28 (Evolutionary Economics)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Dietrich Franz & List Christian, 2011.
"Where do preferences come from?,"
005, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
- Dietrich Franz & List Christian, 2011. "Where do preferences come from?," Research Memorandum 005, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
- Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "Where do preferences come from?," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000001137, David K. Levine.
- Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Where do preferences come from?," MPRA Paper 36115, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
- Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Raphaël Giraud, 2009.
"Framing Effects as Violations of Extensionality,"
- sacha bourgeois-gironde & Raphaël Giraud, 2005. "Accounting for Framing-Effects - an informational approach to intensionality in the Bolker-Jeffrey decision model," UniversitÃ© Paris1 PanthÃ©on-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) ijn_00000656, HAL.
- sacha bourgeois-gironde & Raphaël Giraud, 2005. "Accounting for Framing-Effects - an informational approach to intensionality in the Bolker-Jeffrey decision model," Working Papers ijn_00000656, HAL.
- Whynes, David K. & Frew, Emma J. & Philips, Zoe N. & Covey, Judith & Smith, Richard D., 2007. "On the numerical forms of contingent valuation responses," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 462-476, August.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.