Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Biodiversity and risk management in agriculture:what do we learn from CAP reforms? A farm-level analysis

Contents:

Author Info

  • Elisa Gatto

    ()

  • Alba Marino
  • Guido Signorino
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    On-farm agricultural biodiversity conservation has long been recognized as a fundamental resource to the maintenance of ecologic and economic functions. In this light, planned on-farm biodiversity is represented as an economic asset providing a flow of ecological services to direct use of farmers. In particular, crop-biodiversity, measuring diversity within and among wild and domesticated species, has been found to significantly contribute to the productivity of agricultural production through its effects on agricultural yields and incomes. Moreover, agricultural risk-management literature recognizes the safety role of diversification in the presence of market, climatic and other hazards; given that crops react differently to external shocks, risk-averse farmers will choose to allocate their land to different crops in order to face environmental risks. Among the factors affecting biodiversity, institutional failures at different scales are reported as potential cause of biodiversity loss both in developed and developing areas. Within the European context, subsequent CAP changes toward deregulation and adoption of environmental protection measures have been investigated with the aim to assess their potential effect on farm economic and ecological strategies; the present paper seeks to contribute to this strand of literature by empirically assessing the relationship between farmers? diversification choice and CAP decoupled intervention measures. Focusing on the CAP policy changes occurred since 2003, the paper asks the following research question: has crop-biodiversity been positively affected by the implementation of a system of payments progressively delinked from quantity and quality of production? In order to answer this question, the paper empirical strategy relies on farm-level information drawn from the RICA database which collect annual data on the structure and economic performance of Italian agricultural firms. The analysis is carried out on firms specialized in the cereal sector, as this is a sector that experienced much of the changes coming from the reform of the CAP intervention system. To that purpose, a biodiversity function is estimated along the observed sample covering the 2004-2007 period; biodiversity, measured as spatial diversity, is expressed as a function of a set of variables capturing socio-economic farm characteristics (inputs use, degree of agricultural innovation, age of farm manager), land and agronomic conditions (soil fertility, irrigation, altitude), and the variable measuring CAP support. Finally, we include a dummy variable for regional location in order to account for the effect of specific cultural and physical elements on farmers? production choice.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa13/ERSA2013_paper_00805.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa13p805.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: Nov 2013
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p805

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
    Web page: http://www.ersa.org

    Related research

    Keywords: crop-diversity; risk management; CAP reforms;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Salvatore Di Falco & Jean-Paul Chavas, 2008. "Rainfall Shocks, Resilience, and the Effects of Crop Biodiversity on Agroecosystem Productivity," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(1), pages 83-96.
    2. Pavel Ciaian & Maria Espinosa & Sergio Gomez y Paloma & Stephen Langrell & Kamel Louhichi & Thierry Vard & Thomas Heckelei & Paolo Sckokai & Alban Thomas, 2013. "Farm-household investment behaviour and the CAP decoupling: Methodological issues in assessing policy impacts," JRC-IPTS Working Papers, Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre JRC79969, Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Viaggi, Davide & Raggi, Meri & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio, 2010. "An integer programming dynamic farm-household model to evaluate the impact of agricultural policy reforms on farm investment behaviour," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 1130-1139, December.
    4. Salvatore Di Falco & Jean-Paul Chavas, 2007. "On Crop Biodiversity, Risk Exposure, and Food Security in the Highlands of Ethiopia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(3), pages 599-611.
    5. Moro, Daniele & Sckokai, Paolo, 2011. "The impact of pillar I support on farm choices: conceptual and methodological challenges," 122nd Seminar, February 17-18, 2011, Ancona, Italy, European Association of Agricultural Economists 99836, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Van Dusen, M. Eric & Taylor, J. Edward, 2005. "Missing markets and crop diversity: evidence from Mexico," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(04), pages 513-531, August.
    7. Stefan Baumgärtner & Martin F. Quaas, 2008. "Managing increasing environmental risks through agro-biodiversity and agri-environmental policies," Working Paper Series in Economics, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics 80, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    8. Cisilino, Federica & De Vivo, Carmela & Henke, Roberto & Pupo D'Andrea, Maria Rosaria & Vanni, Francesco, 2. "The effects of decoupling on the COP sector in Italy: an ex-post performance analysis," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L’Informatore Agrario, Edizioni L’Informatore Agrario, issue 2.
    9. Bhaskar, Arathi & Beghin, John C., 2009. "How Coupled Are Decoupled Farm Payments? A Review of the Evidence," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(1), April.
    10. Barry K. Goodwin & Ashok K. Mishra, 2005. "Another Look at Decoupling: Additional Evidence on the Production Effects of Direct Payments," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1200-1210.
    11. Smale, M. & Meng, E. & Brennan, J. P. & Hu, Ruifa, 2003. "Determinants of spatial diversity in modern wheat: examples from Australia and China," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 13-26, January.
    12. Salvatore Di Falco & Charles Perrings, 2004. "Crop Biodiversity, Risk Management and the Implications of Agricultural Assistance," Working Papers, National University of Ireland Galway, Department of Economics 0084, National University of Ireland Galway, Department of Economics, revised 2004.
    13. Salvatore Di Falco & Jean-Paul Chavas & Melinda Smale, 2007. "Farmer management of production risk on degraded lands: the role of wheat variety diversity in the Tigray region, Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 36(2), pages 147-156, 03.
    14. Melinda Smale & Jason Hartell & Paul W. Heisey & Ben Senauer, 1998. "The Contribution of Genetic Resources and Diversity to Wheat Production in the Punjab of Pakistan," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(3), pages 482-493.
    15. Benin, S. & Smale, M. & Pender, J. & Gebremedhin, B. & Ehui, S., 2004. "The economic determinants of cereal crop diversity on farms in the Ethiopian highlands," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 197-208, December.
    16. Paolo Sckokai & Daniele Moro, 2006. "Modeling the Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy for Arable Crops under Uncertainty," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(1), pages 43-56.
    17. James Rude, 2008. "Production Effects of the European Union's Single Farm Payment," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 457-471, December.
    18. Nastis, Stefanos A. & Michailidis, Anastasios & Mattas, Konstadinos, 2011. "Crop biodiversity repercussions of subsidized organic farming in Greece," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland, European Association of Agricultural Economists 114628, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. E. Meng, M. Smale & Brennan, J.P. & Hu, Ruifa, 2003. "Determinants of spatial diversity in modern wheat: examples from Australia and China," Agricultural Economics: The Journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 28(1), January.
    20. Mark Brady & Konrad Kellermann & Christoph Sahrbacher & Ladislav Jelinek, 2009. "Impacts of Decoupled Agricultural Support on Farm Structure, Biodiversity and Landscape Mosaic: Some EU Results," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 563-585.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.