We start by reviewing the graphical approach to teaching the real business cycle model introduced in Barro (1984). We then look at where this approach cuts corners and suggest refinements. Finally, graphical and exact models are compared by means of impulse response functions. The graphical models yield reliable qualitative results. Sizable quantitative differences exist, but these can partly be remedied by adding appropriate refinements. Used by experienced instructors the graphical analysis of the real business cycle equips students with a first understanding of the economy‘s supply side and generates results that will survive closer scrutiny later in the curriculum.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: