This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Posted Offer versus Bargaining: An Example of how Institutions can Facilitate Learning

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Koye Somefun
Abstract

This paper introduces a notion of learning as found in formal learning theory. This concept of learning enables us to investigate the idea that certain market institutions have the desirable property that they reduce the difficulty of adaptive learning, hence facilitating inductive reasoning. To exemplify this idea, we compare the popular market institutions of the posted offer selling mechanism and price bargaining. A seller of a durable consumer good who enjoys relative monopoly power characterizes both market institutions. The seller offers the good for sale for an infinite number of consecutive trading periods. At the beginning of every trading period she has to determine the price and the quality for the good offered where the profits realized in the past guide her choice, i.e., profit serves as the measure of success. Loosely put, the question then is which market institution better facilitates inductive reasoning.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://homepages.cwi.nl/~koye/posted_barg.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 403 Forbidden. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Christopher F. Baum)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2001 with number 79.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 01 Apr 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf1:79

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/conference/SCE2001/SCE2001.html
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: adaptive learning; formal learning theory; computability theory; market structure;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D89 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Other
D49 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure and Pricing - - - Other

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Brock, William A. & Hommes, Cars H., 1998. "Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(8-9), pages 1235-1274, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Fudenberg, Drew & Levine, David, 1998. "Learning in games," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3-5), pages 631-639, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. William A. Brock & Cars H. Hommes, 1997. "A Rational Route to Randomness," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1059-1096, September.
  4. Jean-Michel Grandmont, 1998. "Expectations Formation and Stability of Large Socioeconomic Systems," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 741-782, July.
  5. Bester, Helmut, 1994. "Price commitment in search markets," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 109-120, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  6. Peter Diamond, 1985. "Search Theory," Working papers 389, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
  7. Wang, Ruqu, 1995. "Bargaining versus posted-price selling," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1747-1764, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Bester, Helmut, 1993. "Bargaining versus Price Competition in Markets with Quality Uncertainty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(1), pages 278-88, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. John G. Riley & Richard Zeckhauser, 1980. "Optimal Selling Strategies:," UCLA Economics Working Papers 180, UCLA Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  10. Spear, Stephen E, 1989. "Learning Rational Expectations under Computability Constraints," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(4), pages 889-910, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1987. "The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-48, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Tesfatsion, Leigh, 2001. "Introduction to the special issue on agent-based computational economics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 25(3-4), pages 281-293, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  13. Arnold, Michael A & Lippman, Steven A, 1998. "Posted Prices versus Bargaining in Markets with Asymmetric Information," Economic Inquiry, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 450-57, July.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc and its associated services are free for contributors and users, and do not accept any advertising.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-13.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.