IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rua/wpaper/apru175ye20152.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Экономический Кризис И Новая Парадигма Общественной Поддержки Опекаемых Благ
[Economic Crisis and the New Paradigm of Public Support of the Patronized Goods]

Author

Listed:
  • Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич

Abstract

В работе предложена новая модель экономического регулирования опекаемых благ в гуманитарном секторе экономики, направленная на повышение устойчивости финансового положения организаций культуры, науки, образования и снижение их зависимости от конъюнктурных решений экономических ведомств. Основу данной модели составляют три механизма общественнойподдержки: 1)система финансовых нормативов, характеризующих минимальные доли расходов бюджета на производство соответствующих видов опекаемых благ, отражающих государственные обязательства по их доступности для населения и оплате труда работников культуры,наукииобразования; 2)институт индивидуальных бюджетных назначений, реализующий право участия граждан в выборе направлений расходования ограниченной части налоговых доходов государства; 3) система эндаумент - фондов, позволяющих накапливать поступления от индивидуальных бюджетных назначений и маркированных налогов с целью извлечения возрастающего инвестиционного дохода от целевого капитала, являющегося дополнительным источником финансовой поддержки опекаемых благ в гуманитарном секторе экономики. In this paper,we propose a new model of economic regulation of the patronized goods in the humanitarian sector of the economy,aimed at increasing the sustainability of the financial position of organizations of culture,science,and education and a treduction of their dependence on conjunctural, oropportunistic,decisions of the economicdepartments. Thebasis of this model is composed of three mechanisms of public support: 1) a system of financial performance standards that characterizes a minimumshareofbudgetexpendituresontheproductionoftheappropriatetypesofpatronizedgoods, reflectingstate commitments to their accessibility for the population and the remuneration of labor of workersofculture,scienceandeducation; 2)theinstitution of individual budget appropriations which implements the right of citizens’ participationin the selection ofareas, ordirections of spendinga limited part of state income tax; 3)a system of endowment funds,allowing to accumulate receipts from the individual budget appropriations and labeled taxes,in order to extractthe in creasing in vestment in comefrom the target capital,or the endowment, which is an additional source of financial support for the patronized goods in the humanitarian sector of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Экономический Кризис И Новая Парадигма Общественной Поддержки Опекаемых Благ [Economic Crisis and the New Paradigm of Public Support of the Patronized Goods]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2015:2, Institute of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:rua:wpaper:a:pru175:ye:2015:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.econorus.org/pdf/NEA-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnes, Geraint & Johnes, Jill, 1993. "Measuring the Research Performance of UK Economics Departments: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 332-347, April.
    2. Полтерович В. М. & Попов В. В. & Тонис А. С., 2008. "Нестабильность Демократии В Странах, Богатых Ресурсами," Higher School of Economics Economic Journal Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 12(2), pages 176-200.
    3. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "От Теории К Практике Экономического Регулирования: Десять Тезисов К Проекту Закона О Культуре [From Theory to Practice of Economic Regulation: Ten Theses on the Draft “Law on Culture]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2014:3, Institute of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goodall, Amanda H., 2009. "Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1079-1092, September.
    2. Celik, Orhan & Ecer, Alaattin, 2009. "Efficiency in accounting education: evidence from Turkish Universities," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 614-634.
    3. Othman Joumady & Catherine Ris, 2005. "Performance in European higher education: A non-parametric production frontier approach," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 189-205.
    4. Avkiran, Necmi K., 2001. "Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 57-80, March.
    5. Edoardo Lorenzetti, 2005. "Analysis of the resource concentration on size and research performance: The case of Italian National Research Council over the period 2000-2004," CERIS Working Paper 200502, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    6. Johnes, Jill, 1996. "Performance assessment in higher education in Britain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 18-33, February.
    7. Johnes, Jill & Yu, Li, 2008. "Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 679-696, December.
    8. Tyagi, Preeti & Yadav, Shiv Prasad & Singh, S.P., 2009. "Relative performance of academic departments using DEA with sensitivity analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 168-177, May.
    9. P. S. Nagpaul & Santanu Roy, 2003. "Constructing a multi-objective measure of research performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(3), pages 383-402, March.
    10. Libman, Alexander, 2010. "Subnational resource curse: do economic or political institutions matter?," Frankfurt School - Working Paper Series 154, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management.
    11. Yongil Jeon & Stephen M. Miller & Subhash C. Ray, 2007. "MBA Program Reputation And Quantitative Rankings: New Information for Students, Employers, And Program Administrators," Working papers 2007-44, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    12. repec:lan:wpaper:4049 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Методологический Анализ Теории Опекаемых Благ: Научный Доклад [methodological analysis of the Theory of Patronized Goods. Research report]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2014:1, Institute of Economics.
    14. Ray, Subhash C. & Jeon, Yongil, 2008. "Reputation and efficiency: A non-parametric assessment of America's top-rated MBA programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 245-268, August.
    15. William J. Moore & Robert J. Newman & Peter J. Sloane & Jeremy D. Steely, 2002. "Productivity Effects of Research Assessment Exercises," Departmental Working Papers 2002-15, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    16. Garcia-Lacalle, Javier & Martin, Emilio, 2010. "Rural vs urban hospital performance in a 'competitive' public health service," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1131-1140, September.
    17. Cristian Barra & Roberto Zotti, 2016. "Measuring Efficiency in Higher Education: An Empirical Study Using a Bootstrapped Data Envelopment Analysis," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 22(1), pages 11-33, February.
    18. repec:lan:wpaper:3764 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. George E. Halkos & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes & Stavros A. Kourtzidis, 2010. "An application of statistical interference in DEA models: An analysis of public owned university departments' efficiency," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2010_17, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    20. Liu, John S. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2010. "DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: a case of R&D performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 453-464, December.
    21. Kong, Wei-Hsin & Fu, Tsu-Tan, 2012. "Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 541-549.
    22. Kristof Witte & Nicky Rogge, 2010. "To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 657-680, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    patronized goods; public support; budgetary regulations; the institution of individual budget appropriations; endowment funds; labeled taxes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H80 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - General
    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rua:wpaper:a:pru175:ye:2015:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/derasru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.