IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/84770.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Cost Benefit Analysis of introducing Electric Vehicles in Bhutan

Author

Listed:
  • Norbu, Nyingtob

Abstract

Bhutan is reputed for its pristine environment and its unparalleled commitment towards environmental conservation. However, recent studies have found that carbon emissions are on the rise with rapidly increasing fossil fuel consumption, which now constitutes the most significant item in Bhutan’s import basket. While Bhutan is a net exporter of hydroelectric energy the import of fossil fuel offsets nearly 70% of the exports of electricity to India. In the aftermath of the recent balance of payments challenges with India, the country is compelled to consider alternative mobility options to reduce its dependence on fossil fuel imports and harness its abundant hydro-power, but more importantly, to serve as a model for conservation efforts. With the vision to become the first full-fledged electric-vehicle city in the world, Bhutan must mobilize significant institutional and financial resources. As a stepping stone towards this initiative the government is considering the replacing of a fleet of taxis with electric vehicle equivalents. The relative upfront costs of adopting an electric platform are considered a major deterrent notwithstanding the future stream of savings on account of lower energy and maintenance costs and the intangible benefits to society as a whole. Hence, this paper conducts a Cost Benefit Analysis of the initiative. While most studies focus only on the end-user, this study takes a more comprehensive approach by studying the costs and benefits to both users as well as society taking into consideration various assumptions and scenarios. The macroeconomic and microeconomic implications of this initiative are assessed, and policy recommendations are also offered. Under all scenarios the EV option emerges as the most preferred model. Even the baseline scenario in which no incentives are offered reveals a favourable outcome for the EV. However, these outcomes are assessed over a relatively long time span of 8 and 10 years which gives rise to a time inconsistency problem, which is why some intervention may be necessary to nudge individuals in favour of the EV option.

Suggested Citation

  • Norbu, Nyingtob, 2015. "A Cost Benefit Analysis of introducing Electric Vehicles in Bhutan," MPRA Paper 84770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:84770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/84770/1/MPRA_paper_84770.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Bradley, Thomas H., 2013. "Total cost of ownership, payback, and consumer preference modeling of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 488-506.
    2. Hoch, Stephen J & Loewenstein, George F, 1991. "Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 492-507, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haewon Yoon, 2020. "Impatience and Time Inconsistency in Discounting Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5850-5860, December.
    2. Manel Baucells & Silvia Bellezza, 2017. "Temporal Profiles of Instant Utility During Anticipation, Event, and Recall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 729-748, March.
    3. Jung Lee & Jae-Nam Lee & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2015. "Antecedents of cognitive trust and affective distrust and their mediating roles in building customer loyalty," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 159-175, February.
    4. Wardley, Marcus & Alberhasky, Max, 2021. "Framing zero: Why losing nothing is better than gaining nothing," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Roose, Gudrun & Van Kerckhove, Anneleen & Huyghe, Elke, 2017. "Honey they shrank the food! An integrative study of the impact of food granularity and its operationalization mode on consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 210-220.
    6. P. Herings & Kirsten Rohde, 2006. "Time-inconsistent preferences in a general equilibrium model," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 29(3), pages 591-619, November.
    7. Leonardo Becchettibecchetti & Luisa Corrado & Pierluigi Conzo, 2017. "Sociability, altruism and well-being," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(2), pages 441-486.
    8. Read, Daniel & Roelofsma, Peter H. M. P., 2003. "Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 140-153, July.
    9. Ahuvia, Aaron, 2008. "If money doesn't make us happy, why do we act as if it does?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 491-507, August.
    10. Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Mishra, Hari Govind & Kaul, Surabhi & Singh, Sarabjot, 2014. "Buying Impulsive Trait: An effective moderator for shopping emotions and perceived risk," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-03-17, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    11. Ying Wang & Jialing Pan & Yizhi Xu & Jianli Luo & Yongjiao Wu, 2022. "The Determinants of Impulsive Buying Behavior in Electronic Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Hutchinson, Tim & Burgess, Stuart & Herrmann, Guido, 2014. "Current hybrid-electric powertrain architectures: Applying empirical design data to life cycle assessment and whole-life cost analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 314-329.
    13. Maria Alessandra Antonelli & Valeria De Bonis & Angelo Castaldo & Alessandrao Gandolfo, 2022. "Sin goods taxation: an encompassing model," Public Finance Research Papers 52, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
    14. Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno & Michel Laroche, 2017. "When Materialists Intend to Resist Consumption: The Moderating Role of Self-Control and Long-Term Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 467-483, July.
    15. Bertaut, Carol C. & Haliassos, Michael, 2005. "Credit cards: Facts and theories," CFS Working Paper Series 2006/19, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    16. (Grace) Chae, Boyoun & Yoon, Sangsuk & Baskin, Ernest & (Juliet) Zhu, Rui, 2023. "The lasting smell of temptation: Counteractive effects of indulgent food scents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    17. Jacobs Martin, 2016. "Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 121-183, August.
    18. Fernando S. Machado & Rajiv K. Sinha, 2007. "Smoking Cessation: A Model of Planned vs. Actual Behavior for Time-Inconsistent Consumers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 834-850, 11-12.
    19. Makena Coffman & Paul Bernstein & Sherilyn Wee, 2017. "Electric vehicles revisited: a review of factors that affect adoption," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 79-93, January.
    20. Alfredo De Massis & Josip Kotlar & Pietro Mazzola & Tommaso Minola & Salvatore Sciascia, 2018. "Conflicting Selves: Family Owners' Multiple Goals and Self-Control Agency Problems in Private Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(3), pages 362-389, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cost benefit analysis; sustainable transport; environment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:84770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.