The role of pecuniary and non-pecuniary factors in teacher turnover and mobility decisions
AbstractWe investigate the determinants of teacher exits from and mobility within the Queensland state school system. In common with previous research we find that non-pecuniary factors, such as class size and location, affect movement decisions but our results suggest a significant role for pecuniary factors. In particular, higher wages reduce exits from the public sector, especially in the case of more experienced female teachers. Locality allowances paid to teachers in rural and remote schools, where non-pecuniary factors are less attractive, appear to have some success in attracting and retaining staff in these locations.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department in its series Working Papers with number 579097.
Date of creation: 2006
Date of revision:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Hans BonesrÃ¸nning & Torberg Falch & Bjarne StrÃ¸m, 2003. "Teacher Sorting, Teacher Quality, and Student Composition: Evidence from Norway," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology 3403, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
- Harris, Douglas N. & Adams, Scott J., 2007. "Understanding the level and causes of teacher turnover: A comparison with other professions," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 325-337, June.
- Todd R. Stinebrickner, 2002. "An Analysis of Occupational Change and Departure from the Labor Force: Evidence of the Reasons that Teachers Leave," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 37(1), pages 192-216.
- Eric A. Hanushek & John F. Kain & Steven G. Rivkin, 2001.
"Why Public Schools Lose Teachers,"
NBER Working Papers
8599, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Eric A. Hanushek, 2003.
"The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society,
Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(485), pages F64-F98, February.
- Brewer, Dominic J, 1996. "Career Paths and Quit Decisions: Evidence from Teaching," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(2), pages 313-39, April.
- Stinebrickner, Todd R., 1998. "An Empirical Investigation of Teacher Attrition," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 127-136, April.
- Falch, Torberg & Strom, Bjarne, 2005. "Contents continuedTeacher turnover and non-pecuniary factors," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 758-758, July.
- M. J. Andrews & S. Bradley & D. Stott, 2002. "Matching the Demand for and Supply of Training in the School-to-Work Transition," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(478), pages C201-C219, March.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard Evans).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.