Evolutionary Learning in Signalling Games
AbstractWe study equilibrium selection by evolutionary learning in monotone signalling games. The learning process is a development of that introduced by Young for static games extended to deal with incomplete information and sequential moves; it thus involves stochastic trembles. For vanishing trembles the process gives rise to strong selection among sequential equilibria. If the game has separating equilibria, then in the long run only play according to a specific separating equilibrium, the so-called Riley equilibrium, will be observed frequently. Also if the game has no separating equilibrium a particular behavior will emerge as the only one observed frequently in the long run. It may or may not correspond to a pooling equilibrium, but if it does, it is to one where both types of sender choose the signal that is best for the ''high'' type when all signals are responded to as if they came from the ''low'' type. This selection is stronger than, and only partly in accordance with, traditional selection based on restrictions on ''out-of-equilibrium'' beliefs.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number 99-01.
Length: 32 pages
Date of creation: Apr 1999
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 26, DK-1353 Copenhagen K., Denmark
Phone: (+45) 35 32 30 10
Fax: +45 35 32 30 00
Web page: http://www.econ.ku.dk
More information through EDIRC
monotone signalling games; intuitive criterion; Riley equilibrium; evolutionary learning; separating equilibrium; pooling equilibrium;
Other versions of this item:
- Hans Jørgen Jacobsen & Mogens Jensen & Birgitte Sloth, 1998. "Evolutionary Learning in Signalling Games," CIE Discussion Papers 1999-14, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics, revised Sep 1999.
- Jacobsen, H.J. & Jensen, M. & Sloth, B., 1999. "Evolutionary Learning in Signalling Games," Papers 99-01, Carleton - School of Public Administration.
- C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Friedman, Daniel & Singh, Nirvikar, 2009.
Games and Economic Behavior,
Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 813-829, July.
- Daniel Friedman & Nirvikar Singh, 2004.
"Vengefulness Evolves in Small Groups,"
Game Theory and Information
- Friedman, Daniel & Singh, Nirvikar, 2004. "Vengefulness Evolves in Small Groups," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt0xp29105, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
- Elliott O. Wagner, 2013. "The Dynamics of Costly Signaling," Games, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 4(2), pages 163-181, April.
- Voorneveld, Mark & Weibull, Jörgen W., 2004. "Prices and quality signals," Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 551, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 08 Mar 2004.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabine Fischer).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.