This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Learning: What and How? An Empirical Study of Adjustments in Human Resource Systems

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Avner Ben-Ner ()
Stephanie Lluis ()

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

What information do firms use when they design their organizational structure? How do they learn what direction they should take? Generally, firms may learn from their own experiences and outcomes, as well as those of other firms. In the economics literature, learning from these sources has been investigated in conjunction with three theoretical strands: learning-by-doing, matching theory, and social learning. We construct a conceptual framework that incorporates these three strands and develop hypotheses about the effects of various factors on learning about adjusting one important element of organizational structure, the human resources system. We concentrate on four systems: traditional (the simplest system), decision-making oriented, financial-incentives oriented, and high-performance (the most complex system). The hypotheses regard (1) the effects of learning-by-doing on adoption of more or less complex systems, (2) the shape of the performance-experience learning curves associated with different systems, (3) the match between perceived organizational capabilities and the degree of complexity of human resource systems, (4) the influence of other firms‘ systems and the performance associated with them on a firm‘s adjustment of its system, (5) the effect of a firm‘s location on its adjustment decisions, and (6) the effects of various factors on the speed with which firms adjust their systems. We use a unique panel dataset of firms in Minnesota and obtain a rich set of findings: organizational learning is multifaceted; learning by doing one system helps with other systems; we replicate the famous learning curve only for the complex human resources system; firms use changes in their performance as signals of their capabilities; and firms learn from other firms‘ experiences. Larger and higher-wage firms learn faster to cope with complex systems, older firms learn slower, and firms located near a major metropolitan center adjust faster to more complex systems. JEL classification: D83, L25, M54

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.legacy-irc.csom.umn.edu/RePEC/hrr/papers/0407.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota (Twin Cities Campus) in its series Working Papers with number 0407.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation:
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hrr:papers:0407

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 3-300 Carlson School of Management, 321 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0438
Phone: (612) 624-2500
Fax: (612) 624-8360
Email:
Web page: http://www.irc.csom.umn.edu/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Mary Walker).

Related research
Keywords: Learning-by-doing Matching Social learning Organizational Adjustments Human Resources

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also computes impact factors for journals and working paper series.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-14.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.