This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Marginal railway infrastructure cost estimates in the presence of unobserved effects

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Andersson, Mats () (VTI)
Abstract

New railway legislation in Sweden has increased the need for transparent access charges on the Swedish railway network. The purpose of this paper is to estimate cost functions for infrastructure operation, maintenance and renewal in the Swedish national railway network, using unobserved effects models. The estimated cost functions are used to calculate the marginal cost for railway infrastructure wear and tear and give the Swedish National Rail Administration (Banverket) support in designing a marginal cost based pricing scheme in line with Swedish transport policy. A panel of 185 track sections is observed during 1999-2002. Collected data covers infrastructure, traffic and cost data. Despite having a rich set of information, unobserved effects are assumed to exist, which will bias estimates by ordinary least squares (OLS) due to omitted variables. We therefore use random effects specifications to estimate our models. We find evidence of unobserved effects at a track district level for infrastructure operation, maintenance and renewal costs. We estimate the marginal infrastructure operation cost to SEK 0.50 per train kilometre and the marginal maintenance cost to SEK 0.0029 per gross tonne kilometre. Combining maintenance and renewal cost increases the estimate to SEK 0.0065 per gross tonne kilometre. For all models, elasticities and marginal cost estimates are in line with previous work using pooled ordinary least squares (Andersson, In press).

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI) in its series Working Papers with number 2006:6.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: 25 Aug 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hhs:vtiwps:2006_006

Note: WP 2007:11 is a substantially revised version of this paper.
Contact details of provider:
Postal: VTI, Transport Economics, P.O. Box 6056, SE-171 06 Solna, Sweden
Phone: +46-13-20 40 00
Fax: +46-13-14 14 36
Email:
Web page: http://www.vti.se/tek
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Jan-Eric Swärdh).

Related research
Keywords: Railway; Infrastructure operation; Maintenance; Renewal; Marginal costs; Unobserved effects models;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data
H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
R48 - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics - - Transportation Systems - - - Government Pricing; Regulatory Policies

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. John Kennedy & Andrew S. J. Smith, 2004. "Assessing the Efficient Cost of Sustaining Britain's Rail Network: Perspectives based on Zonal Comparisons," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and University of Bath, vol. 38(2), pages 157-190, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. John D. Bitzan, 2003. "Railroad Costs and Competition: The Implications of Introducing Competition to Railroad Networks," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and University of Bath, vol. 37(2), pages 201-225, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Hausman, Jerry A, 1978. "Specification Tests in Econometrics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(6), pages 1251-71, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Johansson, Per & Nilsson, Jan-Eric, 2004. "An economic analysis of track maintenance costs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 277-286, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Zvi Griliches, 1972. "Cost Allocation in Railroad Regulation," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 3(1), pages 26-41, Spring. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Kennedy, J. & Smith, A.S.J., 2003. "Assessing the efficient cost of sustaining Britain’s rail network: perspectives based on Zonal comparisons," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0317, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Marc Gaudry & Emile Quinet, 2009. "Track wear-and-tear cost by traffic class: Functional form, zero output levels and marginal cost pricing recovery on the French rail network," PSE Working Papers 2009-32, PSE (Ecole normale supérieure). [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc encourages publishers to make their bibliographic data freely available to the public.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-1.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.