IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/aarmap/0069.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods - Results of a cross-national survey

Author

Listed:
  • Bredahl, Lone

    (The MAPP Centre, Aarhus School of Business)

Abstract

1. Previous research has shown consumers to be highly sceptical towards genetic modification in food production. So far, however, little research has tried to explain how consumers form attitudes and make decisions with regard to genetically modified foods. 2. The paper presents the results of a survey which was carried out in Denmark, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom to investigate the formation of consumer attitudes towards genetic modification in food production and of purchase decisions with regard to genetically modified yoghurt and beer. Altogether, 2031 consumers were interviewed in the four countries. 3. Results show that attitude formation and decision-making are more comparable among Danish, German and British consumers than with Italian consumers. Likewise, Italian consumers turned out to be significantly less negative towards genetic modification in foods than particularly Danish and German consumers. This points to a possible North-South division in consumer perceptions of genetic modification. 4. Across countries, attitudes towards genetic modification in food production were deeply embedded in more general attitudes held by the consumers, in particular attitude towards nature and attitude towards technology. These general attitudes were found to influence attitudes towards genetic modification through their impact on perceived risks and benefits of the technology. In Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom, perceived risks of applying genetic modification in food production in themselves prevented the perception of benefits, while in Italy the impacts of perceived risks and benefits on attitudes were identified as entirely additive. 5. Purchase decisions with regard to the two product examples were almost exclusively determined by attitudes towards purchasing the products, which were, in turn, significantly influenced by overall attitudes towards genetic modification in food production through their effects on beliefs that consumer hold about the quality and trustworthiness of the products. 6. The results clearly verify that consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods is low at present. The strong links of attitudes towards genetic modification in food production to higher-order attitudes and knowledge domains suggest that attitudes towards genetically modified foods are quite strong, despite their lack of basis in actual product experience. Likewise, the strong relation of product-specific attitudes to overall attitudes towards genetic modification in food production suggests that at present consumers tend to reject the technology overall rather than to consider products on a case-by-case basis. This situation may, however, be changed by a possible increased availability of genetically modified food products on the consumer market.

Suggested Citation

  • Bredahl, Lone, 2000. "Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods - Results of a cross-national survey," MAPP Working Papers 69, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhb:aarmap:0069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mapp.asb.dk/WPpdf/wp69.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. East, Robert, 1993. "Investment decisions and the theory of planned behaviour," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 337-375, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sunhee Kim & Seoyong Kim, 2018. "Exploring the Determinants of Perceived Risk of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Bech-Larsen , Tino & Grunert, Klaus. G. & Poulsen, Jacob, 2001. "The acceptance of functional foods in Denmark, Finland and the United States: A study of consumers' conjoint evaluations of the qualities of functional foods and perceptions of general health factors ," MAPP Working Papers 73, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
    3. Lynn J. Frewer & Joachim Scholderer & Lone Bredahl, 2003. "Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating Role of Trust," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 1117-1133, December.
    4. Cook, A. J. & Kerr, G. N. & Moore, K., 2002. "Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 557-572, October.
    5. Novoselova, Tatiana A. & van der Lans, Ivo A.C.M. & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Huirne, Ruud B.M., 2005. "Consumer Acceptance of GM Applications in the Pork Production Chain: A Choice Modelling Approach," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24527, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Anne Haukenes, 2004. "Perceived health risks and perceptions of expert consensus in modern food society," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(7-8), pages 759-774, November.
    7. Oddveig Storstad & Hilde Bjørkhaug, 2003. "Foundations of production and consumption of organic food in Norway: Common attitudes among farmers and consumers?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 20(2), pages 151-163, June.
    8. Annelies Verdurme & Jacques Viaene, 2003. "Consumer beliefs and attitude towards genetically modified food: Basis for segmentation and implications for communication," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 91-113.
    9. Han, Jae-Hwan & Harrison, R. Wes, 2006. "Consumer Valuation of the Second Generation of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods with Benefits Disclosure," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35277, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lynne, Gary D. & Franklin Casey, C. & Hodges, Alan & Rahmani, Mohammed, 1995. "Conservation technology adoption decisions and the theory of planned behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 581-598, December.
    2. Heena Thanki & Sweety Shah & Harishchandra Singh Rathod & Ankit D. Oza & Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis, 2022. "I Am Ready to Invest in Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) Options Only If the Returns Are Not Compromised: Individual Investors’ Intentions toward SRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2023. "Risk-Taking, Financial Knowledge, and Risky Investment Intention: Expanding Theory of Planned Behavior Using a Moderating-Mediating Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Jackson, Elizabeth & Quaddus, Mohammed & Islam, Nazrul & Stanton, John & Hoque, Zohurul, 2007. "A Multi-Disciplinary Approach For Determining Adoption Of Agricultural Price Risk Management Strategies," 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK 7985, Agricultural Economics Society.
    5. Geert Van Campenhout, 2015. "Revaluing the Role of Parents as Financial Socialization Agents in Youth Financial Literacy Programs," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 186-222, March.
    6. Naili Farida & Elia Ardyan & Nuryakin, 2016. "Gender Differences in Interest in Using Electronic Money: An Application of Theory Planned Behavior," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 898-903.
    7. Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Renée Hannah A. Niro, 2023. "Antecedents of Real Estate Investment Intention among Filipino Millennials and Gen Z: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-35, September.
    8. Jeroen P.J. de Jong, 2013. "The Decision to Exploit Opportunities for Innovation: A Study of High–Tech Small–Business Owners," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(2), pages 281-301, March.
    9. Ross M.G. Norman & Richard M. Sorrentino & Deborah Windell & Yang Ye & Andrew C.H. Szeto & Rahul Manchanda, 2010. "Predicting Behavioural Intentions to Those With Mental Illness: the Role of Attitude Specificity and Norms," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(3), pages 239-254, May.
    10. Nguyen, Cathy & Faulkner, Margaret & Yang, Song & Williams, John & Tong, Luqiong, 2022. "Mind the gap: Understanding the gap between intentions and behaviour in the charity context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 216-224.
    11. Balushi, Yasmeen Al & Locke, Stuart & Boulanouar, Zakaria, 2018. "Islamic financial decision-making among SMEs in the Sultanate of Oman: An adaption of the theory of planned behaviour," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 30-38.
    12. Adu Bonna & Robert Awobgo-Moah Amoah, 2020. "Influence of Culture on Investment Decisions: A Cross-Sectional Study of Ghanaian Population," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(6), pages 32-45.
    13. Thomas Hutzschenreuter & Un‐Seok Han & Ingo Kleindienst, 2020. "Exploring managerial intentionality," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 406-414, April.
    14. Scarpi, Daniele, 2012. "Work and Fun on the Internet: The Effects of Utilitarianism and Hedonism Online," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 53-67.
    15. Naili Farida & Elia Ardyan & Nuryakin, 2016. "Gender Differences in Interest in Using Electronic Money: An Application of Theory Planned Behavior," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 898-903.
    16. Sanz Blas Silvia & Ruiz Mafé Carla & Pérez Pérez Isabel, 2013. "Factores determinantes de la lealtad al proveedor de servicios turísticos online," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 58(2), pages 279-302, abril-jun.
    17. Fiona Gibson & Michael Burton, 2014. "Salt or Sludge? Exploring Preferences for Potable Water Sources," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 57(3), pages 453-476, March.
    18. Umi Widyastuti & Erie Febrian & Sutisna & Tettet Fitrijanti, 2019. "Factors Explaining the Market Discipline of Sharia Mutual Funds from a Behavioural Finance Perspective: A Theoretical Approach," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 198-212.
    19. Grunert, Klaus G. & Bech-Larsen, Tino, 2005. "Explaining choice option attractiveness by beliefs elicited by the laddering method," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 223-241, April.
    20. Choi, Jayoung & Geistfeld, Loren V., 2004. "A cross-cultural investigation of consumer e-shopping adoption," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 821-838, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer behaviour; Buying behaviour; Food; Denmark; Italy; United Kingdom; Germany;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:aarmap:0069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Helle Vinbaek Stenholt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hahoadk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.