IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joinma/v26y2012i1p53-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work and Fun on the Internet: The Effects of Utilitarianism and Hedonism Online

Author

Listed:
  • Scarpi, Daniele

Abstract

Consumers may act on the spur of the moment, driven by fun and curiosity, or be goal-oriented, task-focused utilitarians. This study investigates the effects of consumers’ hedonic and utilitarian orientation online on price consciousness, frequency of purchase, purchased amount, intention to re-patronize a Web site and expertise with the Internet. It specifically considers purchasing, not mere browsing, basing on data collected on customers of one of the largest Italian online retailers for electronics. The data show significant differences between hedonic and utilitarian orientation online with regard to past purchase frequency, the amount purchased and the intention to re-patronize the Web site in the future. The findings suggest that utilitarianism is strongly present online, and is valuable, thus utilitarian consumers should not be neglected, but hedonism is even more profitable, impacting on the number of items purchased and the intention to come back to the Web site. No differences are found in the level of price consciousness or in the degree of expertise with the Internet.

Suggested Citation

  • Scarpi, Daniele, 2012. "Work and Fun on the Internet: The Effects of Utilitarianism and Hedonism Online," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 53-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:26:y:2012:i:1:p:53-67
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2011.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094996811000648
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Varadarajan, Rajan & Srinivasan, Raji & Vadakkepatt, Gautham Gopal & Yadav, Manjit S. & Pavlou, Paul A. & Krishnamurthy, Sandeep & Krause, Tom, 2010. "Interactive Technologies and Retailing Strategy: A Review, Conceptual Framework and Future Research Directions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 96-110.
    2. Stoel, Leslie & Wickliffe, Vanessa & Lee, Kyu Hye, 2004. "Attribute beliefs and spending as antecedents to shopping value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(10), pages 1067-1073, October.
    3. Lee, Khai Sheang & Tan, Soo Jiuan, 2003. "E-retailing versus physical retailing: A theoretical model and empirical test of consumer choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 877-885, November.
    4. Jones, Michael A. & Reynolds, Kristy E. & Arnold, Mark J., 2006. "Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 974-981, September.
    5. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    6. Grewal, Dhruv & Janakiraman, Ramkumar & Kalyanam, Kirthi & Kannan, P.K. & Ratchford, Brian & Song, Reo & Tolerico, Stephen, 2010. "Strategic Online and Offline Retail Pricing: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 138-154.
    7. East, Robert, 1993. "Investment decisions and the theory of planned behaviour," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 337-375, June.
    8. Lichtenstein, Donald R & Bloch, Peter H & Black, William C, 1988. "Correlates of Price Acceptability," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 243-252, September.
    9. Celsi, Richard L & Rose, Randall L & Leigh, Thomas W, 1993. "An Exploration of High-Risk Leisure Consumption through Skydiving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Wendy W. Moe & Peter S. Fader, 2004. "Dynamic Conversion Behavior at E-Commerce Sites," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 326-335, March.
    11. Lesser, Jack A. & Hughes, Marie Adele, 1986. "Towards a typology of shoppers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 56-62.
    12. Wang, Yong Jian & Minor, Michael S. & Wei, Jie, 2011. "Aesthetics and the online shopping environment: Understanding consumer responses," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 46-58.
    13. Sloot, Laurens M. & Verhoef, Peter C., 2008. "The Impact of Brand Delisting on Store Switching and Brand Switching Intentions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 281-296.
    14. Kenneth Bollen, 1986. "Sample size and bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(3), pages 375-377, September.
    15. Hoffman, Donna L. & Novak, Thomas P., 2009. "Flow Online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 23-34.
    16. Overby, Jeffrey W. & Lee, Eun-Ju, 2006. "The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1160-1166, October.
    17. Babin, Barry J. & Attaway, Jill S., 2000. "Atmospheric Affect as a Tool for Creating Value and Gaining Share of Customer," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 91-99, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scarpi, Daniele & Pizzi, Gabriele & Visentin, Marco, 2014. "Shopping for fun or shopping to buy: Is it different online and offline?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 258-267.
    2. Jackson, Vanessa & Stoel, Leslie & Brantley, Aquia, 2011. "Mall attributes and shopping value: Differences by gender and generational cohort," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 1-9.
    3. Ben Mimoun, Mohammed Slim & Poncin, Ingrid, 2015. "A valued agent: How ECAs affect website customers' satisfaction and behaviors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 70-82.
    4. Karine Picot-Coupey & Nina Krey & Elodie Huré & Claire-Lise Ackermann, 2021. "Still work and/or fun? -Corroboration of the hedonic and utilitarian shopping value scale," Post-Print hal-02572817, HAL.
    5. Lo, Ada & Qu, Hailin, 2015. "A theoretical model of the impact of a bundle of determinants on tourists’ visiting and shopping intentions: A case of mainland Chinese tourists," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 231-243.
    6. Davis, Lizhu & Hodges, Nancy, 2012. "Consumer shopping value: An investigation of shopping trip value, in-store shopping value and retail format," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 229-239.
    7. Han-Shen Chen & Chia-Hsing Liang & Shu-Yi Liao & Hung-Yu Kuo, 2020. "Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions toward Food Delivery Platform Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Mencarelli, Rémi & Lombart, Cindy, 2017. "Influences of the perceived value on actual repurchasing behavior: Empirical exploration in a retailing context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 12-21.
    9. Guo, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Kexin & Wang, Chaoyou, 2022. "Way to success: Understanding top streamer's popularity and influence from the perspective of source characteristics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. El Hedhli, Kamel & Zourrig, Haithem & Chebat, Jean-Charles, 2016. "Shopping well-being: Is it just a matter of pleasure or doing the task? The role of shopper's gender and self-congruity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Haoying Han & Noman Sahito & Thuy Van Thi Nguyen & Jinsoo Hwang & Muhammad Asif, 2019. "Exploring the Features of Sustainable Urban Form and the Factors that Provoke Shoppers towards Shopping Malls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Rémi Mencarelli & Carole Lombart, 2017. "Influences of the perceived value on actual repurchasing behavior: Empirical exploration in a retailing context," Post-Print hal-01592035, HAL.
    13. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo & Kummer, Claudia, 2015. "Cognitive fit, retail shopper confusion, and shopping value: Empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1003-1011.
    14. Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Kaklauskas, Arturas & Bausys, Romualdas & Naumcik, Andrej & Ubarte, Ieva, 2021. "Integrated hedonic-utilitarian valuation of the built environment by neutrosophic INVAR method," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Bonnin, Gaël & Goudey, Alain, 2012. "The kinetic quality of store design: An Exploration of its influence on shopping experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 637-643.
    16. Ainsworth, Jeremy & Foster, Jamye, 2017. "Comfort in brick and mortar shopping experiences: Examining antecedents and consequences of comfortable retail experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 27-35.
    17. Bradley, Gregory T. & LaFleur, Elizabeth K., 2016. "Toward the development of hedonic-utilitarian measures of retail service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 60-66.
    18. Yumei Luo & Qiongwei Ye, 2019. "Understanding Consumers’ Loyalty to an Online Outshopping Platform: The Role of Social Capital and Perceived Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Han-Jen Niu & Fei-Hsu Sun Hung & Po-Ching Lee & Yensen Ni & Yuhsin Chen, 2023. "Eco-Friendly Transactions: Exploring Mobile Payment Adoption as a Sustainable Consumer Choice in Taiwan and the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-18, December.
    20. El Hedhli, Kamel & Zourrig, Haithem & Park, Jeongsoo, 2017. "Image transfer from malls to stores and its influence on shopping values and mall patronage: The role of self-congruity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 208-218.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joinma:v:26:y:2012:i:1:p:53-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-interactive-marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.