Keynes's animal spirits vindicated: an analysis of recent empirical and neural data on money illusion
AbstractExperimental economics and neuroeconomics are likely to provide new insights on the individual and sub-individual (neurobiological processes) anchoring of money illusion. In particular, some recent brain studies show that we appear more "motivated" and "rewarded" by nominal rather than real monetary values. The sensitivity of the reward brain system to the nominal format of money, due to the salience of this format, may explain money illusion at a biological level. If money illusion is thus rooted in our nature it sounds vain to expect from public monetary policies an elimination of this behavioral anomaly. On the contrary, we contend that the theoretical admission of the money illusion phenomenon, by early 20th century economists such as Keynes or Fisher, is now vindicated by experimental and neurobiological data, in spite of its long occultation by monetarist economists.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number ijn_00713479.
Date of creation: 2011
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 2011, 34, 2, 331-352
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00713479
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
money illusion; experimental economics; neuroeconomics; animal spirits.;
Other versions of this item:
- Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Marianne Guille, 2011. "Keynes's animal spirits vindicated: an analysis of recent empirical and neural data on money illusion," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 34(2), pages 331-352, January.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Christofides, L. & Peng, C., 2004.
"Contract Duration and Indexation in a Period of Real and Nominal Uncertainty,"
2004-3, University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance.
- Christofides, Louis N. & Peng, Chen, 2006. "Contract duration and indexation in a period of real and nominal uncertainty," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 61-86, February.
- Louis Christofides & Amy Chen Peng, 2003. "Contract Duration and Indexation in a Period of Real and Nominal Uncertainty," CESifo Working Paper Series 994, CESifo Group Munich.
- Ernst Fehr & Jean-Robert Tyran, 2001.
"Does Money Illusion Matter?,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1239-1262, December.
- Ernst Fehr & Jean-Robert Tyran, 2000. "Does Money Illusion Matter?," IEW - Working Papers 045, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Ernst Fehr & Jean-Robert Tyran, . "Does Money Illusion Matter?," IEW - Working Papers 012, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Edmund Cannon & Giam Pietro Cipriani, 2003.
"Euro-illusion: a natural experiment,"
Bristol Economics Discussion Papers
03/556, Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
- Besancenot, Damien & Rocheteau, Guillaume & Vranceanu, Radu, 2000. "Search, Price Illusion and Welfare," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 109-124, January.
- Paul Davidson, 2010. "Behavioral economists should make a turn and learn from Keynes and Post Keynesian economics," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 33(2), pages 251-254, January.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.