Large stakes and big mistakes
AbstractMost upper-management and sales force personnel, as well as workers in many other jobs, are paid based on performance, which is widely perceived as motivating effort and enhancing productivity relative to non-contingent pay schemes. However, psychological research suggests that excessive rewards can in some cases produce supra-optimal motivation, resulting in a decline in performance. To test whether very high monetary rewards can decrease performance, we conducted a set of experiments at MIT, the University of Chicago, and rural India. Subjects in our experiment worked on different tasks and received performance-contingent payments that varied in amount from small to large relative to their typical levels of pay. With some important exceptions, we observed that high reward levels can have detrimental effects on performance.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Boston in its series Working Papers with number 05-11.
Date of creation: 2005
Date of revision:
Other versions of this item:
- NEP-ALL-2005-09-13 (All new papers)
- NEP-CBE-2005-09-14 (Cognitive & Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-CWA-2005-09-11 (Central & Western Asia)
- NEP-EXP-2005-09-14 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-LAB-2005-10-05 (Labour Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Frey, Bruno S & Jegen, Reto, 2001. " Motivation Crowding Theory," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 589-611, December.
- Canice Prendergast, 1999. "The Provision of Incentives in Firms," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 37(1), pages 7-63, March.
- Uri Gneezy & Aldo Rustichini, 2000.
"A fine is a price,"
Natural Field Experiments
00258, The Field Experiments Website.
Blog mentionsAs found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
- Inefficient and unfair
by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2012-01-21 12:53:52
- The bosses' pay con-trick
by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2011-10-28 09:21:13
- How bonuses backfire
by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2011-09-19 14:06:31
- The left & shareholder activism
by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2012-05-08 13:51:01
- A benefit of performance pay
by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2012-05-29 13:43:17
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Catherine Spozio).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.