This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Business Subsidies and Bureaucratic Behaviour - A Revised Approach

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Takis Venetoklis

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This dissertation is a collection of three studies whose central theme is the business subsidies policy implemented in Finland during the 1990s by the ministry of Trade and Industry (KTM). The purpose is to examine whether the policy is effective and at the same time explain the rationale behind it. The first study measures econometrically the impact of business subsidies on the growth of value added of firms. The results indicate that the impact is positive but extremely low considering the amount of subsidies spent. This in turn raises questions on the effectiveness of the business subsidies policy currently in force. The second study surveys other evaluation studies of business subsidies that were conducted in Finland and abroad. The methods found in the surveyed studies are associated with the results produced. When primary data are utilised (estimates of impacts are taken directly from the subsidised firms) the results are positive. On the contrary, when secondary data are used to measure impact and scientific methods are applied, the results lean more on the negative side. If impact studies on business subsidies suggest ineffectiveness why is such policy still adopted? The third study attempts to answer this question by approaching the problem not from the demand side (the recipient firms) but from the supply side (the organisation designing and distributing the subsidies to firms). It tests whether the behaviour of the KTM's civil servants, when distributing business subsidies to firms, is in line with William Niskanen's (1971) bureau budget maximising theory. The empirical results support the theory on some accounts.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.vatt.fi/file/vatt_publication_pdf/t83.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.vatt.fi/publications/latestPublications/publication/Publication_1345_id/313
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT) in its series Research Reports with number 83.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 27 Nov 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fer:resrep:83

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Arkadiankatu 7, P.O. Box 1279, FI-00101 Helsinki
Phone: +358 40 304 5500
Fax: +358 9 4780 2929
Email:
Web page: http://www.vatt.fi/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Anita Niskanen).

Related research
Keywords: Business subsidies; bureaucratic behaviour; budget maximisation; evaluation methods; value added growth;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - General - - - General
O10 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. William G. Gale, 1990. "Collateral, Rationing, and Government Intervention in Credit Markets," NBER Chapters, in: Asymmetric Information, Corporate Finance, and Investment, pages 43-62 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Roper, S. & Dewitt-Dundas, N., 1998. "Grant Assistance and Small Firm Development in Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland," Working Papers NIERC. 38, Economic Research Institute of Northern Ireland. [Downloadable!]
  3. Takis Venetoklis, 1999. "Process Evaluation of Business Subsidies in Finland. A Quantitative Approach," Research Reports 58, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  4. Robson, P J A & Bennett, R J, 2000. "The Use and Impact of Business Advice by SMEs in Britain: An Empirical Assessment Using Logit and Ordered Logit Models," Applied Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 32(13), pages 1675-88, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Bhagwati, Jagdish N, 1982. "Directly Unproductive, Profit-seeking (DUP) Activities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 90(5), pages 988-1002, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Niskanen, William A, 1975. "Bureaucrats and Politicians," Journal of Law & Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(3), pages 617-43, December.
  7. Benedict J. Clements & Gerd Schwartz & Hugo Rodríguez, 1998. "Economic Determinants of Government Subsidies," IMF Working Papers 98/166, International Monetary Fund.
  8. Benedict J. Clements & Gerd Schwartz & Réjane Hugounenq, 1995. "Government Subsidies - Concepts, International Trends, and Reform Options," IMF Working Papers 95/91, International Monetary Fund.
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Mika Haapanen & Anu Tokila & Jari Ritsilä, 2005. "When are investment subsidies crucial for investments?," ERSA conference papers ersa05p466, European Regional Science Association. [Downloadable!]
  2. Aki Kangasharju, 2005. "Do Wages Subsidies Increase Employment in Subsidised Firms?," Discussion Papers 378, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc and its associated services are free for contributors and users, and do not accept any advertising.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-10.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.