This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Process Evaluation of Business Subsidies in Finland. A Quantitative Approach

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Takis Venetoklis

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This is an evaluation study which examines the financing process through which Finnish enterprises apply and receive business subsidies from the central government. It examines comprehensively the three entities involved when this type of state aid is distributed in Finland, namely the applicant enterprises, the projects financed and the distributors of funds. It demonstrates how quantitative methods can be used to monitor and evaluate state aid to enterprises. In the study the distributor is the Ministry of Trade and Industry (KTM). The material is gathered from data found in state aid applications by enterprises located in industrially declining areas (European Structural Funds Objective 2 areas) in the prefectures of Varsinais-Suomi and Päijät-Häme during 1995-96. The study focuses upon the characteristics of the applicant enterprises and the projects financed. It also includes performance measurements of different financing operations by the KTM. Furthermore, by building logistic regression models, it examines the factors that influence the KTM in deciding whether to finance or not a state aid application. Results indicate (a) that there are no clear differences between enterprises which receive aid and those which do not and (b) that each KTM office applies to some extent its own financing procedures. Recommendations based on this study include (1) the standardization of the selection methods of enterprises, (2) the better utilization of the databases, (3) the creation of a flexible and targeted system of state aid where final beneficiaries are clearly defined, (4) the creation of a follow-up system to measure and evaluate the impact of the state aid, (5) imposing restrictions as to how often the same enterprises can be granted aid and (6) the introduction of an alternative type of aid in the form of forgivable loans.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.vatt.fi/publications/latestPublications/publication/Publication_1345_id/121
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT) in its series Research Reports with number 58.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 01 Jan 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fer:resrep:58

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Arkadiankatu 7, P.O. Box 1279, FI-00101 Helsinki
Phone: +358 40 304 5500
Fax: +358 9 4780 2929
Email:
Web page: http://www.vatt.fi/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Anita Niskanen).

Related research
Keywords: process evaluation; business subsidies; EU structural funds; quantitative methods;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General - - - General
M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
O10 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Takis Venetoklis, 2000. "Methods applied in evaluating business subsidy programs: A survey," Discussion Papers 236, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  2. Aki Kangasharju, 2005. "Do Wages Subsidies Increase Employment in Subsidised Firms?," Discussion Papers 378, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Takis Venetoklis & Aki Kangasharju, 2002. "Business Subsidies and Employment of Firms: Overall Evaluation and Regional Extension," Discussion Papers 268, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  4. Kangasharju, Aki & Venetoklis, Takis, 2002. "Effect of business subsidies on labour demand: overall evaluation with regional extensions," ERSA conference papers ersa02p172, European Regional Science Association. [Downloadable!]
  5. Takis Venetoklis, 2001. "Business Subsidies and Bureaucratic Behaviour," Research Reports 79, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  6. Takis Venetoklis & Aki Kangasharju, 2003. "Do Wage-subsidies Increase Employment in Firms?," Discussion Papers 304, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
  7. Takis Venetoklis, 2001. "Business Subsidies and Bureaucratic Behaviour - A Revised Approach," Research Reports 83, Government Institute for Economic Research Finland (VATT). [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? A few items listed on IDEAS are over 2000 years old!

This page was last updated on 2009-12-10.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.