Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The Response of Firms to Eligibility Thresholds : Evidence from the Japanese Value-Added Tax

Contents:

Author Info

  • Kazuki Onji

    (Australia–Japan Research Centre, Australian National University)

Abstract

It is common to defi ne benefi t eligibility for small business policies by restrictions on the fi rm size. This paper investigates the incentives for a large fi rm to masquerade as many small fi rms by separately incorporating business segments, focusing on the case of the Japanese value-added tax. The paper fi nds that the masquerading was pervasive and took place quickly after the introduction of tax incentives. Tax avoidance caused 3.4 per cent of the overall revenue drain in 1990, thus reducing horizontal equity, but the effi ciency consequence would not have been severe. This study suggests that the masquerading by fi rms may be commonplace in other settings.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.eaber.org/node/21965
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by East Asian Bureau of Economic Research in its series Finance Working Papers with number 21965.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: Jan 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:eab:financ:21965

Contact details of provider:
Postal: JG Crawford Building #13, Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government, Australian National University, ACT 0200
Web page: http://www.eaber.org
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Tax avoidance; Business group; Value-added tax; Firm size distribution;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Cabral, Luís M B & Mata, José, 2001. "On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 3045, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  2. Yafeh, Yishay, 2000. "Corporate Governance in Japan: Past Performance and Future Prospects," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 74-84, Summer.
  3. Kristin F. Butcher & John DiNardo, 1998. "The Immigrant and Native-born Wage Distributions: Evidence from United States Censuses," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 6630, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. John DiNardo & Justin L. Tobias, 2001. "Nonparametric Density and Regression Estimation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 11-28, Fall.
  5. Mackie-Mason, Jeffrey K & Gordon, Roger H, 1997. " How Much Do Taxes Discourage Incorporation?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 477-505, June.
  6. Hines, J.R. & Rice, E.M., 1990. "Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens And American Business," Papers, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Discussion Paper 56, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Discussion Paper.
  7. Kazuki Onji, 2008. "The Response of Firms to Eligibility Thresholds: Evidence from the Japanese Value-Added Tax," Asia Pacific Economic Papers, Australia-Japan Research Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University 370, Australia-Japan Research Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
  8. John Lintner & J. Keith Butters, 1955. "Effects of Taxes on Concentration," NBER Chapters, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, in: Business Concentration and Price Policy, pages 239-280 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  9. Jagadeesh Sivadasan & Joel Slemrod, 2006. "Tax Law Changes, Income Shifting and Measured Wage Inequality: Evidence from India," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 12240, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  10. Gordon, R.H. & Mackie-Mason, J.K., 1993. "Tax Distorsions to the Choice of Organizational Form," Memorandum, Oslo University, Department of Economics 21/1993, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
  11. Granovetter, Mark, 1995. "Coase Revisited: Business Groups in the Modern Economy," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 93-130.
  12. Daron Acemoglu & Joshua D. Angrist, 2001. "Consequences of Employment Protection? The Case of the Americans with Disabilities Act," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 109(5), pages 915-957, October.
  13. Peter Hart & Nicholas Oulton, 1997. "Zipf and the size distribution of firms," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 205-206.
  14. Hatta, Tatsuo, 1992. "The Nakasone-Takeshita Tax Reform: A Critical Evaluation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 231-36, May.
  15. Burkhauser, Richard V, et al, 1999. "Testing the Significance of Income Distribution Changes over the 1980s Business Cycle: A Cross-National Comparison," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(3), pages 253-72, May-June.
  16. Stanley, Michael H. R. & Buldyrev, Sergey V. & Havlin, Shlomo & Mantegna, Rosario N. & Salinger, Michael A. & Eugene Stanley, H., 1995. "Zipf plots and the size distribution of firms," Economics Letters, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 453-457, October.
  17. Roger H. Gordon & Joel Slemrod, 1998. "Are "Real" Responses to Taxes Simply Income Shifting Between Corporate and Personal Tax Bases?," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 6576, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  18. Flath, David, 2000. "The Japanese Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, number 9780198775034, October.
  19. Fabiano Schivardi & Roberto Torrini, 2004. "Threshold effects and firm size: the case of firing costs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library 19956, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  20. Keen, Michael & Mintz, Jack, 2004. "The optimal threshold for a value-added tax," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 88(3-4), pages 559-576, March.
  21. Daniel Chiquiar & Gordon H. Hanson, 2002. "International Migration, Self-Selection, and the Distribution of Wages: Evidence from Mexico and the United States," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 9242, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  22. Pagan,Adrian & Ullah,Aman, 1999. "Nonparametric Econometrics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521586115.
  23. Colin Wren, 2002. "Evaluating the effect of soft business support upon small firm performance," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 334-365, April.
  24. Scholes, Myron S & Wolfson, Mark A, 1990. "The Effects of Changes in Tax Laws on Corporate Reorganization Activity," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(1), pages S141-64, January.
  25. Thomas F. Cargill & Michael M. Hutchison & Takatoshi Ito, 1997. "The Political Economy of Japanese Monetary Policy," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262032473, December.
  26. Stephens, Melvin Jr & Ward-Batts, Jennifer, 2004. "The impact of separate taxation on the intra-household allocation of assets: evidence from the UK," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 88(9-10), pages 1989-2007, August.
  27. David Johnson & Roger Wilkins, 2004. "Effects of Changes in Family Composition and Employment Patterns on the Distribution of Income in Australia: 1981-1982 to 1997-1998," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 80(249), pages 219-238, 06.
  28. White, Lawrence J, 1982. "The Determinants of the Relative Importance of Small Business," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 64(1), pages 42-49, February.
  29. Harry Grubert & Joel Slemrod, 1998. "The Effect Of Taxes On Investment And Income Shifting To Puerto Rico," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 80(3), pages 365-373, August.
  30. Grubert, Harry & Mutti, John, 1991. "Taxes, Tariffs and Transfer Pricing in Multinational Corporate Decision Making," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 73(2), pages 285-93, May.
  31. Ishi, Hiromitsu, 2001. "The Japanese Tax System," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199242566, October.
  32. Tarun Khanna & Yishay Yafeh, 2005. "Business Groups and Risk Sharing around the World," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(1), pages 301-340, January.
  33. Goolsbee, Austan & Maydew, Edward, 2002. "Taxes and Organizational Form: The Case of REIT Spin-offs," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, National Tax Association, vol. 55(3), pages 441-56, September.
  34. Roger H. Gordon & Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason, 1990. "Effects of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 on Corporate Financial Policy and Organizational Form," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 3222, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  35. Schmalensee, Richard, 1988. "Industrial Economics: An Overview," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(392), pages 643-81, September.
  36. Curry, B & George, K D, 1983. "Industrial Concentration: A Survey," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 203-55, March.
  37. Peter B. Dixon & Mark R. Picton & Maureen T. Rimmer, 2004. "Payroll Taxes: Thresholds, Firm Sizes, Dead-weight Losses and Commonwealth Grants Commission Funding," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 80(250), pages 289-301, 09.
  38. Noguchi, Yukio, 1992. "The Changing Japanese Economy and the Need for a Fundamental Shift in the Tax System," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 226-30, May.
  39. Kaizuka, Keimei, 1992. "The Shoup Tax System and the Postwar Development of the Japanese Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 221-25, May.
  40. Baldwin, John R & Gorecki, Paul K, 1985. "The Determinants of Small Plant Market Share in Canadian Manufacturing Industries in the 1970s," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 67(1), pages 156-61, February.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Kazuki Onji, 2008. "The Response of Firms to Eligibility Thresholds : Evidence from the Japanese Value-Added Tax," Finance Working Papers, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research 21965, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
  2. Chang-Tai Hsieh & Benjamin A. Olken, 2014. "The Missing "Missing Middle"," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 28(3), pages 89-108, Summer.
  3. Paul E. Carrillo & M. Shahe Emran & Anita Rivadeneira, 2011. "Do Cheaters Bunch Together? Profit Taxes, Withholding Rates and Tax Evasion," Working Papers, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy 2011-03, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
  4. Jonathan Goyette, 2012. "Optimal tax threshold: the consequences on efficiency of official vs. effective enforcement," Cahiers de recherche, Departement d'Economique de la Faculte d'administration à l'Universite de Sherbrooke 12-07, Departement d'Economique de la Faculte d'administration à l'Universite de Sherbrooke.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eab:financ:21965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shiro Armstrong).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.