A Factorial Survey on the Justice of Earnings within the SOEP-Pretest 2008
AbstractIn the 2008 Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) Pretest, the factorial survey method was tested for the first time for use in the SOEP longitudinal study. In this paper, we describe the construction and application of the vignette module, which has its origins in the field of justice research and is used in particular in the measurement of income justice. We show that the factorial survey method is applicable in large-scale survey research when taking certain constraints into account, and that respondents of varying ages and educational groups are able to deal sufficiently well with answering the questions. The results obtained suggest that older respondents tend to take fewer dimensions into consideration in forming their opinions. Further studies will be needed to determine whether this is evidence that the evaluation tasks were too complex for these respondents and should thus be interpreted as a method effect, or whether it represents a valid substantive result. The results of the study demonstrate convincingly that alongside occupation, education, and performance¿factors relating directly to employment¿familial aspects such as civil status, the partner¿s employment status, and number of children constitute important criteria for determining what constitutes a ¿fair¿ income. The factor survey in the 2008 SOEP Pretest offers diverse analytical potential, both from a methodological point of view and in terms of the empirical results obtained. The positive experience with the 2008 SOEP Pretest suggests that the SOEP vignette module can be used effectively in a future wave of the main SOEP survey.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) in its series SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research with number 238.
Length: 35 p.
Date of creation: 2009
Date of revision:
income; justice theory; fairness; factorial survey method; SOEP;
Other versions of this item:
- Sauer, Carsten & Liebig, Stefan & Auspurg, Katrin & Hinz, Thomas & Donaubauer, Andy & Schupp, Jürgen, 2009. "A Factorial Survey on the Justice of Earnings within the SOEP-Pretest 2008," IZA Discussion Papers 4663, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data
- D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
- J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2010-01-10 (All new papers)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Arie Kapteyn & James P. Smith & Arthur van Soest, 2011.
"Are Americans Really Less Happy With Their Incomes?,"
858, RAND Corporation Publications Department.
- Kapteyn, A. & Smith, J.P. & Soest, A.H.O. van, 2011. "Are Americans Really Less Happy With Their Incomes?," Discussion Paper 2011-059, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Jasso, Guillermina & Meyersson Milgrom, Eva M., 2007.
"Distributive Justice and CEO Compensation,"
IZA Discussion Papers
3236, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- repec:ese:iserwp:2012-01 is not listed on IDEAS
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.