IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/822.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Developing Countries and the Uruguay Round Negotiations on Services

Author

Listed:
  • Hoekman, Bernard

Abstract

In the late 1980s many developing countries experienced something of a paradigm shift, in that governments began to pursue more market oriented domestic policies. There was increasingly a perception that liberalizing access to service markets was a potentially low cost and effective method of improving the quality and efficiency of domestic service sectors. These unilateral policy developments increased the incentives for developing countries as a group to participate in a multilateral agreement to liberalize trade in services. This paper explores the extent to which initial negotiating positions of developing countries are reflected in the draft General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) that has emerged from the Uruguay Round negotiations. One issue that is addressed is whether the unilateral policy changes implemented by many developing countries in the late 1980s had a discernible impact on their negotiating stances and on the framework agreement. Another objective is to discuss the potential relevance of the draft GATS for developing countries. Given that many developing countries are pursuing regulatory reform and liberalization efforts, to what extent will signing the GATS help governments seeking to enhance the efficiency of their service sectors?

Suggested Citation

  • Hoekman, Bernard, 1993. "Developing Countries and the Uruguay Round Negotiations on Services," CEPR Discussion Papers 822, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=822
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drake, William J. & Nicolaïdis, Kalypso, 1992. "Ideas, interests, and institutionalization: “trade in services†and the Uruguay Round," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 37-100, January.
    2. Bernard Hoekman, 1992. "Market Access Through Multilateral Agreement: From Goods to Services," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 707-728, November.
    3. Gary P. Sampson & Richard H. Snape, 1985. "Identifying the Issues in Trade in Services," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 171-182, June.
    4. Bhagwati, Jagdish N, 1987. "Trade in Services and the Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 1(4), pages 549-569, September.
    5. Sapir, Andre, 1986. "Trade in investment-related technological services," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 605-622, May.
    6. Cho, Yoon Je, 1988. "Some Policy Lessons from the Opening of the Korean Insurance Market," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 2(2), pages 239-254, May.
    7. Bernard Hoekman & Guy Karsenty, 1992. "Economic Development and International Transactions in Services," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 211-236, September.
    8. Bernard M. Hoekman, 1993. "Safeguard Provisions and International Trade Agreements Involving Services," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 29-49, January.
    9. Hoekman, B.M., 1988. "Agriculture And The Uruguay Round," Working Papers 226, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colleen Hamilton & John Whalley, 1995. "Evaluating the Impact of the Uruguay Round Results on Developing Countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 31-49, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2010. "Services Trade and Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(3), pages 642-692, September.
    2. Langhammer, Rolf J., 2000. "Developing countries as exporters of services: looking beyond success episodes," Kiel Working Papers 992, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Langhammer, Rolf J., 1989. "North-South trade in services: Some empirical evidence," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1992, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Fred Henneberger & Alexandre Ziegler, 2003. "Aussenhandel und Auslandsproduktion im Dienstleistungssektor: Theorie und Empirie der Beschäftigungseffekte für die schweizerische Tourismusbranche," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 139(IV), pages 535-561, December.
    5. Francois, Joseph & Wooton, Ian, 2001. "Market structure, trade liberalization and the GATS," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 389-402, June.
    6. Hoekman, Bernard, 1995. "Tentative first steps : an assessment of the Uruguay Round agreement on services," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1455, The World Bank.
    7. repec:dgr:rugsom:00c21 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Julián Tole Martínez, 2019. "Colombia entre los TLC y la OMC: ¿liberación o administración del comercio internacional?," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1139, October.
    9. Singh, Nirvikar, 2006. "Services-led industrialization in India: Assessment and lessons," MPRA Paper 1276, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Sandra Lavenex & Flavia Jurje, 2021. "Opening‐up labor mobility? Rising powers' rulemaking in trade agreements," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 598-615, July.
    11. Eunji Oh & M. Minsuk Shin, 2020. "Study Abroad in Support of Higher Education Sustainability: An Application of Service Trade Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Matteo Fiorini & Bernard Hoekman, 2020. "EU services trade liberalization and economic regulation: Complements or substitutes?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 247-270, January.
    13. Bernard Hoekman & Carlos Braga, 1997. "Protection and Trade in Services: A Survey," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 285-308, July.
    14. Lucretia Mariana Constantinescu & Maria Cristina Stefan, 2016. "Post - Crisis Resilience and Trends in the International Service Exchanges by Romania," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 146-155.
    15. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8601 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Maria D. Tito, 2019. "Exporters of Services: A Look at U.S. Exporters Outside of the Manufacturing Sector," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-063, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    17. repec:wip:wpaper:3 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Milsom, Luke & Pažitka, Vladimír & Roland, Isabelle & Wójcik, Dariusz, 2023. "The gravity of syndication ties in international equity underwriting," Bank of England working papers 1021, Bank of England.
    19. Joseph Francois & Miriam Manchin & Patrick Tomberger, 2015. "Services Linkages and the Value Added Content of Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 1631-1649, November.
    20. Krancke, Jan, 1999. "Liberalisierung des internationalen Dienstleistungshandels: Analyse des GATS und Perspektiven für die zukünftige Handelsliberalisierung," Kiel Working Papers 954, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    21. Bradford, Scott C. & Das, Satya & Saha, Anuradha, 2022. "Country size, per-capita income, and comparative advantage: services versus manufacturing," MPRA Paper 115091, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    22. Andre Sapir, 1988. "International Trade in Telecommunications Services," NBER Chapters, in: Issues in US-EC Trade Relations, pages 231-246, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    23. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m3igpqi is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Francois, Joseph & Christen, Elisabeth, 2010. "Modes of Delivery in Services," CEPR Discussion Papers 7912, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic Development; Multilateral Trade Negotiations; Trade in Services;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.