IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000439/009256.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La política comercial del sector agrícola en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Hernando José Gómez
  • Juan Camilo Restrepo Salazar
  • John Nash
  • Alberto Valdés

Abstract

En este Cuaderno se presentan las memorias de un debate convocado por Fedesarrollo en mayo de 2001, orientado a evaluar la política comercial del agro colombiano y el desaprovechamiento de las oportunidades de crecimiento del sector que ofrece el mercado mundial.Uno de los cambios estructurales más importantes que ha tenido la economía mundial en los últimos anos ha sido el aumento de los precios internacionales de los productos agrícolas. Aunque durante mucho tiempo se registró una tendencia a la caída de los precios de los productos primarios en el mercado mundial, ese fenómeno se ha revertido en lo corrido de este siglo gracias a la creciente demanda por alimentos generada por el crecimiento de economías como las de China e India, y por los altos precios de los hidrocarburos que han encarecido los insumos agrícolas y han producido una mayor demanda por biocombustibles.Varias economías latinoamericanas se han beneficiado de esta situación internacional. En los últimos anos, países como Brasil, Perú y Chile se han convertido en grandes exportadores de productos agrícolas y agroindustriales, y han convertido sus sectores agropecuarios en motor de crecimiento económico. Entre tanto, Colombia ha tenido un comportamiento opuesto. La economía colombiana es una de las que menos exporta productos agrícolas en la región, y el sector agropecuario ha crecido menos que el promedio de la economía nacional en el pasado reciente. Esta situación es particularmente preocupante teniendo en cuenta que tres cuartas partes del área cultivable del país no se dedica a actividades agrícolas y que el desempleo rural supera el urbano.Una de las razones por las cuales el agro colombiano no ha aprovechado el auge del mercado internacional tiene que ver con la política comercial de sector. Sólo dos ramas productivas de la economía colombiana conservan un tratamiento preferencial en cuanto a sus aranceles: el automotor y el agropecuario. En este último caso, la protección derivada de mecanismos como el Sistema de Franjas de Precios y las recurrentes salvaguardias han generado un sesgo anti-exportador que ha volcado los recursos del sector hacia el mercado doméstico, lo que se ha traducido en menores niveles de productividad y crecimiento, como lo muestra el debate cuyas memorias se presentan en este Cuaderno.

Suggested Citation

  • Hernando José Gómez & Juan Camilo Restrepo Salazar & John Nash & Alberto Valdés, 2011. "La política comercial del sector agrícola en Colombia," Cuadernos de Fedesarrollo 9256, Fedesarrollo.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000439:009256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11445/161
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aksoy, M. Ataman & Ng, Francis, 2010. "The evolution of agricultural trade flows," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5308, The World Bank.
    2. Perfetti, J. J., 2009. "Crisis y pobreza rural en América Latina: el caso de Colombia," Working papers 043, Rimisp Latin American Center for Rural Development.
    3. Minot, Nicholas & Ngigi, Margaret, 2004. "Are horticultural exports a replicable success story?," MTID discussion papers 73, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Absalón Machado & Carlos Salgado & Rafael Vásquez, 2004. "La Academia y el Sector Rural 1," La Academia y el Sector Rural 2929, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra & Antonio José Orozco-Gallo, 2017. "Technical efficiency for Colombian small crop and livestock farmers: A stochastic metafrontier approach for different production systems," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra & Antonio José Orozco-Gallo, 2015. "Eficiencia técnica de los hogares con producción agropecuaria en Colombia," Documentos de trabajo sobre Economía Regional y Urbana 227, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miet Maertens & Liesbeth Colen & Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2011. "Globalisation and poverty in Senegal: a worst case scenario?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 38(1), pages 31-54, March.
    2. Surabhi Mittal, 2007. "Can Horticulture be a Success Story for India?," Working Papers id:1159, eSocialSciences.
    3. Falck Zepeda, José & Barreto-Triana, Nancy & Baquero-Haeberlin, Irma & Espitia-Malagón, Eduardo & Fierro-Guzmán, Humberto & López, Nancy, 2006. "An exploration of the potential benefits of integrated pest management systems and the use of insect resistant potatoes to control the Guatemalan Tuber Moth (Tecia solanivora Povolny) in Ventaquemada,," EPTD discussion papers 152, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Maertens, Miet & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2009. "Trade, Standards, and Poverty: Evidence from Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 161-178, January.
    5. Tao Xiang & Jikun Huang & d’Artis Kancs & Scott Rozelle & Jo Swinnen, 2012. "Food Standards and Welfare: General Equilibrium Effects," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 223-244, June.
    6. Svatos, Miroslav & Smutka, Lubos, 2012. "Development of Agricultural Trade of Visegrad Group Countries in Relation to EU and Third Countries," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(3), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Hazell, Peter B.R., 2012. "Leonard K. Elmhirst Lecture: Options for African Agriculture in an Era of High Food and Energy Prices," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 127070, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Otieno, David Jakinda & Omiti, John M. & Nyanamba, Timothy O. & McCullough, Ellen B., 2009. "Application of Chow test to improve analysis of farmer participation in markets in Kenya," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 50776, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Githiomi, Caroline & Muriithi, Beatrice & Irungu, Patrick & Mwungu, Chris M. & Diiro, Gracious & Affognon, Hippolyte & Mburu, John & Ekesi, Sunday, 2019. "Economic analysis of spillover effects of an integrated pest management (IPM) strategy for suppression of mango fruit fly in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 121-132.
    10. Weinberger, Katinka & Lumpkin, Thomas A., 2007. "Diversification into Horticulture and Poverty Reduction: A Research Agenda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1464-1480, August.
    11. Paul J. Block & Kenneth Strzepek & Mark W. Rosegrant & Xinshen Diao, 2008. "Impacts of considering climate variability on investment decisions in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(2), pages 171-181, September.
    12. Johan F.M. Swinnen & Scott Rozelle & Tao Xiang & Thijs Vandemoortele, 2008. "A Theory of Standards-Driven Rural Development," LICOS Discussion Papers 19908, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    13. Di Falco, Salvatore & Chavas, Jean-Paul & Smale, Melinda, 2006. "Farmer management of production risk on degraded lands: the role of wheat genetic diversity in Tigray Region, Ethiopia," EPTD discussion papers 153, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Bignebat, C. & Vagneron, I., 2011. "Cross-border coordination in the Madagascar-EU lychee chain: the role of GlobalGAP," Working Papers MoISA 201106, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    15. Miyata, Sachiko & Minot, Nicholas & Hu, Dinghuan, 2009. "Impact of Contract Farming on Income: Linking Small Farmers, Packers, and Supermarkets in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1781-1790, November.
    16. Swinnen Johan & Vandeplas Anneleen, 2012. "Rich Consumers and Poor Producers: Quality and Rent Distribution in Global Value Chains," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-30, January.
    17. Minten, Bart & Randrianarison, Lalaina & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2009. "Global Retail Chains and Poor Farmers: Evidence from Madagascar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1728-1741, November.
    18. Anouk Patel‐Campillo, 2011. "Transforming Global Commodity Chains: Actor Strategies, Regulation, and Competitive Relations in the Dutch Cut Flower Sector," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 87(1), pages 79-99, January.
    19. Maertens, Miet, 2006. "High-value supply chains, food standards and poor farmers in developing countries: the case of vegetable exports from Senegal," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21317, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Moranga, Lawrence Ongwae & Otieno, David Jakinda & Oluoch-Kosura, Willis, 2016. "Analysis Of Factors Influencing Tomato Farmers’ Willingness To Adopt Innovative Timing Approaches For Management Of Climate Change Effects In Taita Taveta County, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 269270, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Política comercial; Agricultura; Sector agropecuario; Competitividad; Economía agrícola; Agroindustria; Incentivos agrícolas; Liberalización comercial; Política arancelaria;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000439:009256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Patricia Monroy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedesco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.