This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Central And Eastern European Countries In The International Division Of Labour In Europe

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Michael Freudenberg
Francoise Lemoine

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Ten countries in Central and Eastern Europe have applied for EU membership and five of them (Estonia, Hungary, Czech Republic, Poland, Slovenia) have already begun negotiation for accession . All ten countries have Association agreements with the EU, which have liberalised most trade in industrial products. In the perspective of their future integration in an enlarged EU, the present paper analyses the position of the ten candidates in the international division of labour in Europe, for the recent period (1993-1996). The paper points out that beyond the relative stability in the pattern of comparative advantage observed at the industry level, changes are underway. The present pattern of comparative advantage may reflect more the past strengths of these countries than their future specialisation. First, there has been a trend towards de-specialisation: trade of Central European countries has been characterised by a decrease of their revealed comparative advantages in the very sectors in which they were the strongest(mainly in clothing and footwear industries), as well as by a decrease of some of their largest comparative disadvantages. Second, in this short period of time, some countries succeeded in building new comparative advantages. Most remarkable changes took place in engineering industries in which Central European countries have achieved high export growth. Third, the involvement of foreign capital in manufacturing industry has reached high levels and has been an important element underlying export performance.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/workpap/pdf/1999/wp99-05a.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by CEPII research center in its series Working Papers with number 1999-05.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Apr 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:cii:cepidt:1999-05

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 9 rue Georges Pitard, 75740 Paris Cedex 15
Phone: 33 01 53 68 55 00
Fax: 33 01 53 68 55 01
Web page: http://www.cepii.fr
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: comparative advantage; foreign capital; intra-industry; international division of the production process; Balkan and Baltic countries; Central European countries; quality segments;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Country and Industry Studies of Trade
F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. James A. Brander & Paul Krugman, 1983. "A 'Reciprocal Dumping' Model of International Trade," NBER Working Papers 1194, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. Krugman, Paul, 1980. "Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(5), pages 950-59, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Aturupane, Chonira & Djankov, Simeon & Hoekman, Bernard, 1997. "Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade between East and West Europe," CEPR Discussion Papers 1721, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. Lancaster, Kelvin, 1980. "Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 151-175, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Falvey, Rodney E., 1981. "Commercial policy and intra-industry trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 495-511, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Sutton, John, 1986. "Vertical Product Differentiation: Some Basic Themes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 393-98, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Helpman, Elhanan, 1981. "International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition : A Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin approach," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 305-340, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Djankov, Simeon & Hoekman, Bernard, 1996. "Intra-Industry Trade, Foreign Direct Investment and the Reorientation of East European Exports," CEPR Discussion Papers 1377, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Hoekman, Bernard & Djankov, Simeon, 1996. "Intra-industry trade, foreign direct investment, and the reorientation of Eastern European exports," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1652, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  10. Aiginger, Karl, 1997. "The Use of Unit Values to Discriminate between Price and Quality Competition," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 571-92, September.
  11. Hoekman, Bernard & Djankov, Simeon, 1997. "Determinants of the Export Structure of Countries in Central and Eastern Europe," World Bank Economic Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 471-87, September.
  12. Lionel Fontagne & Michael Freudenberg, 1997. "Intra-Industry Trade : Methodological Issues Reconsidered," Working Papers 1997-01, CEPII research center. [Downloadable!]
  13. Lionel Fontagne & Michael Freudenberg & Nicholas Peridy, 1997. "Trade Patterns Inside the Single Market," Working Papers 1997-07, CEPII research center. [Downloadable!]
  14. Krugman, Paul R, 1981. "Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from Trade," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(5), pages 959-73, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  15. Coe, David T. & Helpman, Elhanan, 1995. "International R&D spillovers," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 859-887, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  16. Brander, James A., 1981. "Intra-industry trade in identical commodities," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  17. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  18. Deardorff, Alan V., 1979. "Weak links in the chain of comparative advantage," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 197-209, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  19. David Greenaway & Johan Torstensson, 1997. "Back to the future: Taking stock on intra-industry trade," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 249-269, 06. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  20. Krugman, Paul R., 1979. "Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 469-479, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Luca De Benedictis & Lucia Tajoli, 2003. "Economic integration, similarity and convergence in the EU and CEECs trade structures," CESPRI Working Papers 148, CESPRI, Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Jul 2003. [Downloadable!]
  2. J. Caetano & A. Galego & E. Vaz & C. Vieira & I. Vieira, 2002. "The Eastward Enlargement of the Eurozone: Trade and FDI," Eastward Enlargement of the Euro-zone Working Papers wp07, Free University Berlin, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence, revised 01 Aug 2002. [Downloadable!]
  3. Francoise Lemoine & Deniz Unal-Kesenci, 2002. "China in the International Segmentation of Production Processes," Working Papers 2002-02, CEPII research center. [Downloadable!]
  4. Alessia Amighini, 2004. "China in the international fragmentation of production: Evidence from the ICT industry," CESPRI Working Papers 151, CESPRI, Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Jan 2004. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Anna Maria Ferragina & Francesco Pastore, 2005. "Mind the Gap: Unemployment in the New EU Regions," IZA Discussion Papers 1565, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Balazs Egert & Amina Lahreche-Revil, 2003. "Estimating the Fundamental Equilibrium Exchange Rate of Central and Eastern European Countries The EMU Enlargement Perspective," Working Papers 2003-05, CEPII research center. [Downloadable!]
  7. Adam, Antonis & Moutos, Thomas, 2002. "The Political Economy of EU Enlargement: Or, Why Japan is not a Candidate Country?," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
  8. Anna Maria Pinna & C. Fancello, 2002. "How far do we trade intermediate inputs?," Working Paper CRENoS 200207, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia. [Downloadable!]
  9. Alessia Amighini & Stefano Chiarlone, 2005. "New comparative advantages in the Central and Eastern European countries," LIUC Papers in Economics 182, Cattaneo University (LIUC). [Downloadable!]
  10. French-German Economic Forum, 1999. "Reduction of working time - Eastward Enlargement of the European Union," Working Papers 1999-13, CEPII research center. [Downloadable!]
  11. Eleonora Cavallaro & Marcella Mulino, 2008. "Vertical Innovation and Catching-Up: Implications of EU Integration for CEECs-5," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 265-279, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All RePEc services are meant to be be free forever, as they are all run by volunteers.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-22.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.