The purpose of this paper is to examine the emerging and transition economies’ experience with capital account convertibility, capital account management and capital controls. Overall, the analysis suggests that policies aiming at controlling capital flows have been less effective—in terms of helping achieve their objectives—than claimed by their supporters. An econometric analysis also suggests that restricting capital mobility does not reduce the probability of experiencing a current account reversal. On the other hand, the degree of financial openness does not appear to be related to the intensity with which reversals affect real economic performance.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Claudio Sepulveda).
Related research
Keywords:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Paul R. Krugman & Kenneth S. Rogoff & Stanley Fischer & William J. McDonough, 1999.
"Currency Crises,"
NBER Chapters,
in: International Capital Flows, pages 421-466
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Paul Krugman, 2000.
"Currency Crises,"
NBER Books,
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number krug00-1.