IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2103.11557.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal exit decision of venture capital under time-inconsistent preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Yanzhao Li
  • Ju'e Guo
  • Yongwu Li
  • Xu Zhang

Abstract

This paper proposes two kinds of time-inconsistent preferences (i.e. time flow inconsistency and critical time point inconsistency) to further advance the research on the exit decision of venture capital. Time-inconsistent preference, different from time-consistent preference, assumes that decision makers prefer recent returns rather than future returns. Based on venture capitalists' understanding of future preferences, we consider four types of venture capitalists, namely time-consistent venture capitalists, venture capitalists who only realize critical time point inconsistency, naive venture capitalists and sophisticated venture capitalists, of which the latter three are time-inconsistent. All types of time-inconsistent venture capitalists are aware of critical time point inconsistency. Naive venture capitalists misunderstand time flow inconsistency while sophisticated ones understand it correctly. We propose an optimal exit timing of venture capital model. Then we derive and compare the above four types of venture capitalists' exit thresholds. The main results are as follows: (1) all types of time-inconsistent venture capitalists tend to exit earlier than time-consistent venture capitalists. (2) The longer the expire date are, the more likely venture capitalists are to delay the exit, but the delay degree decreases successively (venture capitalists who only realize critical time point inconsistency > naive venture capitalists > sophisticated venture capitalists).

Suggested Citation

  • Yanzhao Li & Ju'e Guo & Yongwu Li & Xu Zhang, 2021. "Optimal exit decision of venture capital under time-inconsistent preferences," Papers 2103.11557, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2103.11557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.11557
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arcot, Sridhar & Fluck, Zsuzsanna & Gaspar, José-Miguel & Hege, Ulrich, 2015. "Fund managers under pressure: Rationale and determinants of secondary buyouts," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 102-135.
    2. Grenadier, Steven R. & Wang, Neng, 2007. "Investment under uncertainty and time-inconsistent preferences," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 2-39, April.
    3. Giot, Pierre & Schwienbacher, Armin, 2007. "IPOs, trade sales and liquidations: Modelling venture capital exits using survival analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 679-702, March.
    4. Marmer, Vadim & Slade, Margaret E., 2018. "Investment and uncertainty with time to build: Evidence from entry into U.S. copper mining," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 233-254.
    5. Avinash K. Dixit & Robert S. Pindyck, 1994. "Investment under Uncertainty," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 5474.
    6. J. Muñoz & J. Contreras & J. Caamaño & P. Correia, 2011. "A decision-making tool for project investments based on real options: the case of wind power generation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 465-490, June.
    7. Luis Alvarez & Rune Stenbacka, 2006. "Takeover Timing, Implementation Uncertainty, and Embedded Divestment Options," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 10(3), pages 417-441, September.
    8. R. H. Strotz, 1955. "Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 23(3), pages 165-180.
    9. Hellmann, Thomas, 2006. "IPOs, acquisitions, and the use of convertible securities in venture capital," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 649-679, September.
    10. Ko, Chuan-Chuan & Lin, Tyrone T. & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The venture capital entry model on game options with jump-diffusion process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 87-94, November.
    11. Guo, Qian-Wen & Chen, Shumin & Schonfeld, Paul & Li, Zhongfei, 2018. "How time-inconsistent preferences affect investment timing for rail transit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 172-192.
    12. Chen, Shumin & Wang, Xi & Deng, Yinglu & Zeng, Yan, 2016. "Optimal dividend-financing strategies in a dual risk model with time-inconsistent preferences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 27-37.
    13. Carsten Bienz & Uwe Walz, 2010. "Venture Capital Exit Rights," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 1071-1116, December.
    14. Thijssen, Jacco J.J., 2008. "Optimal and strategic timing of mergers and acquisitions motivated by synergies and risk diversification," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 1701-1720, May.
    15. Tian, Yuan, 2016. "Optimal capital structure and investment decisions under time-inconsistent preferences," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 83-104.
    16. George Loewenstein & Drazen Prelec, 1992. "Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 107(2), pages 573-597.
    17. Christopher Harris & David Laibson, 2013. "Instantaneous Gratification," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(1), pages 205-248.
    18. Thaler, Richard, 1981. "Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 201-207.
    19. Chen, Shumin & Zeng, Yan & Hao, Zhifeng, 2017. "Optimal dividend strategies with time-inconsistent preferences and transaction costs in the Cramér–Lundberg model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 31-45.
    20. repec:oup:qjecon:v:128:y:2012:i:1:p:205-248 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Arcot, Sridhar, 2014. "Participating convertible preferred stock in venture capital exits," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 72-87.
    22. Gao, Xiaohui & Ritter, Jay R. & Zhu, Zhongyan, 2013. "Where Have All the IPOs Gone?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(6), pages 1663-1692, December.
    23. Cumming, Douglas & Johan, Sofia Atiqah binti, 2008. "Preplanned exit strategies in venture capital," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 1209-1241, October.
    24. David Laibson, 1997. "Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 443-478.
    25. Cumming, Douglas (ed.), 2012. "The Oxford Handbook of Venture Capital," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195391596.
    26. Kandel, Eugene & Leshchinskii, Dima & Yuklea, Harry, 2011. "VC Funds: Aging Brings Myopia," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 431-457, April.
    27. Richard Smith & Robert Pedace & Vijay Sathe, 2011. "VC Fund Financial Performance: The Relative Importance of IPO and M&A Exits and Exercise of Abandonment Options," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 40(4), pages 1029-1065, December.
    28. Nishihara, Michi, 2017. "Selling out or going public? A real options signaling approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 146-152.
    29. Gompers, Paul & Lerner, Josh, 1999. "An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture capital partnership," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 3-44, January.
    30. Sergio Franklin, 2015. "Investment decisions in mobile telecommunications networks applying real options," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 201-220, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanzhao Li & Ju-e Guo & Shaolong Sun & Yongwu Li, 2022. "How time-inconsistent preferences influence venture capital exit decisions? A new perspective for grandstanding," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Li, Yuan & Yang, Jinqiang & Zhao, Siqi, 2022. "Present-biased government and sovereign debt dynamics," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Niu, Yingjie & He, Linfeng & Wu, Wei, 2021. "Managerial compensation with hyperbolic discounting," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    4. Liya Liu & Yingjie Niu & Yuanping Wang & Jinqiang Yang, 2020. "Optimal consumption with time-inconsistent preferences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(3), pages 785-815, October.
    5. Ebert, Sebastian & Wei, Wei & Zhou, Xun Yu, 2020. "Weighted discounting—On group diversity, time-inconsistency, and consequences for investment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Chen, Shumin & Zeng, Yan & Hao, Zhifeng, 2017. "Optimal dividend strategies with time-inconsistent preferences and transaction costs in the Cramér–Lundberg model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 31-45.
    7. Tian, Yuan, 2016. "Optimal capital structure and investment decisions under time-inconsistent preferences," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 83-104.
    8. Luo, Pengfei & Tian, Yuan & Yang, Zhaojun, 2020. "Real option duopolies with quasi-hyperbolic discounting," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Hu, Fan & Zhang, Fan & Zou, Zhentao, 2020. "R&D investment under time-inconsistent preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Shigeta, Yuki, 2022. "Quasi-hyperbolic discounting under recursive utility and consumption–investment decisions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Yingjie Niu & Zhentao Zou, 2019. "Corporate Investment, Tobin's Q and Liquidity Management under Time-Inconsistent Preferences," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 20(2), pages 721-736, November.
    12. Yu-Jui Huang & Adrien Nguyen-Huu, 2018. "Time-consistent stopping under decreasing impatience," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 69-95, January.
    13. Liu, Bo & Mu, Congming & Yang, Jinqiang, 2017. "Dynamic agency and investment theory with time-inconsistent preferences," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 88-95.
    14. Guo, Qian-Wen & Chen, Shumin & Schonfeld, Paul & Li, Zhongfei, 2018. "How time-inconsistent preferences affect investment timing for rail transit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 172-192.
    15. Luca Di Corato, 2018. "Rural land development under hyperbolic discounting: a real option approach," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 167-182, July.
    16. Marín-Solano, Jesús & Navas, Jorge, 2010. "Consumption and portfolio rules for time-inconsistent investors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 860-872, March.
    17. Grenadier, Steven R. & Wang, Neng, 2007. "Investment under uncertainty and time-inconsistent preferences," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 2-39, April.
    18. li, Hong & Mu, Congming & Yang, Jinqiang, 2016. "Optimal contract theory with time-inconsistent preferences," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 519-530.
    19. Cetemen, Doruk & Feng, Felix Zhiyu & Urgun, Can, 2023. "Renegotiation and dynamic inconsistency: Contracting with non-exponential discounting," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    20. Liu, Bo & Lu, Lei & Mu, Congming & Yang, Jinqiang, 2016. "Time-inconsistent preferences, investment and asset pricing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 48-52.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2103.11557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.