IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pki394.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Harold Kincaid

Personal Details

First Name:Harold
Middle Name:
Last Name:Kincaid
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pki394
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

(50%) Research Unit for Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics (RUBEN)
School of Economics
Faculty of Commerce
University of Cape Town

Cape Town, South Africa
http://www.ruben.uct.ac.za/
RePEc:edi:ruuctza (more details at EDIRC)

(50%) School of Economics
Faculty of Commerce
University of Cape Town

Cape Town, South Africa
http://www.economics.uct.ac.za/
RePEc:edi:seuctza (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters Books

Working papers

  1. Glenn W. Harrison & Andre Hofmeyr & Harold Kincaid & Don Ross & J. Todd Swarthout, 2018. "Smoking and Intertemporal Risk Attitudes," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2018-09, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
  2. Miquel Pellicer & Eva Wegner & Lindsay Benstead & Harold Kincaid & Ellen Lust & Juanita Vasquez, 2014. "The demand side of clientelism: The role of client's perceptions and values," SALDRU Working Papers 140, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.

Articles

  1. Glenn W. Harrison & Andre Hofmeyr & Harold Kincaid & Brian Monroe & Don Ross & Mark Schneider & J. Todd Swarthout, 2022. "Subjective beliefs and economic preferences during the COVID-19 pandemic," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 795-823, June.
  2. Glenn W. Harrison & Andre Hofmeyr & Harold Kincaid & Brian Monroe & Don Ross & Mark Schneider & J. Todd Swarthout, 2021. "A case study of an experiment during the COVID-19 pandemic: online elicitation of subjective beliefs and economic preferences," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 194-209, December.
  3. Chetty, Rinelle & Hofmeyr, Andre & Kincaid, Harold & Monroe, Brian, 2021. "The Trust Game Does Not (Only) Measure Trust: The Risk-Trust Confound Revisited," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  4. Andre Hofmeyr & Harold Kincaid, 2019. "Prospect theory in the wild: how good is the nonexperimental evidence for prospect theory?," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 13-31, January.
  5. Harold Kincaid, 2011. "Making philosophy of economics relevant," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 79-81.
  6. Kincaid, Harold, 2003. "The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, NANCY CARTWRIGHT. Cambridge University Press, 1999, ix + 240 pages," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 167-170, April.
  7. Kincaid, Harold, 1997. "Reason in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. By Martin Hollis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 283p. $59.95 cloth, $17.95 paper," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 91(1), pages 171-171, March.
  8. Kincaid, Harold, 1993. "The Economic Ideas of Ordinary People, Levy David. London: Routledge, 1992, x + 341 pages," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 328-333, October.

Chapters

  1. Harold Kincaid, 2004. "Methodological Individualism and Economics," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & Alain Marciano & Jochen Runde (ed.), The Elgar Companion To Economics and Philosophy, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Books

  1. Harold Kincaid & Don Ross (ed.), 2021. "A Modern Guide to Philosophy of Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18608.
  2. Kincaid, Harold (ed.), 2012. "The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195392753.
  3. Kincaid, Harold & Ross, Don (ed.), 2009. "The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195189254.
  4. Kincaid,Harold, 1996. "Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521482684.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

    Sorry, no citations of working papers recorded.

Articles

  1. Glenn W. Harrison & Andre Hofmeyr & Harold Kincaid & Brian Monroe & Don Ross & Mark Schneider & J. Todd Swarthout, 2022. "Subjective beliefs and economic preferences during the COVID-19 pandemic," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 795-823, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Block, Joern & Kritikos, Alexander S. & Priem, Maximilian & Stiel, Caroline, 2022. "Emergency-aid for self-employed in the Covid-19 pandemic: A flash in the pan?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Paul Bokern & Jona Linde & Arno Riedl & Peter Werner, 2023. "The Robustness of Preferences during a Crisis: The Case of Covid-19," CESifo Working Paper Series 10595, CESifo.
    3. King King Li & Ying-Yi Hong & Bo Huang & Tony Tam, 2022. "Social preferences before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in China," Post-Print hal-03899653, HAL.
    4. Boutin, Delphine & Petifour, Laurene & Megzari, Haris, 2023. "Permanent Instability of Preferences after COVID-19 Crisis: A Natural Experiment from Urban Burkina Faso," IZA Discussion Papers 16075, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Lohmann, Paul M. & Gsottbauer, Elisabeth & You, Jing & Kontoleon, Andreas, 2023. "Anti-social behaviour and economic decision-making: panel experimental evidence in the wake of COVID-19," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117702, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Thierry Blayac & Dimitri Dubois & Sébastien Duchêne & Phu Nguyen-Van & Bruno Ventelou & Marc Willinger, 2022. "What drives the acceptability of restrictive health policies: An experimental assessment of individual preferences for anti-COVID 19 strategies," Post-Print hal-03866196, HAL.
    7. Crosetto, Paolo & de Haan, Thomas, 2023. "Comparing input interfaces to elicit belief distributions," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18, pages 1-1, January.
    8. Castillo, Jose Gabriel & Hernandez, Manuel A., 2023. "The unintended consequences of confinement: Evidence from the rural area in Guatemala," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Petersen, Luba & Rholes, Ryan, 2022. "Macroeconomic expectations, central bank communication, and background uncertainty: A COVID-19 laboratory experiment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    10. Hamza Umer, 2023. "A selected literature review of the effect of Covid-19 on preferences," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(1), pages 147-156, June.

  2. Chetty, Rinelle & Hofmeyr, Andre & Kincaid, Harold & Monroe, Brian, 2021. "The Trust Game Does Not (Only) Measure Trust: The Risk-Trust Confound Revisited," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Cited by:

    1. Füllbrunn, Sascha & Vyrastekova, Jana, 2023. "Does trust break even? A trust-game experiment with negative endowments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Bejarano, Hernán & Gillet, Joris & Rodriguez-Lara, Ismael, 2021. "Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Dirk Engelmann & Jana Friedrichsen & Roel van Veldhuizen & Pauline Vorjohann & Joachim Winter, 2023. "Decomposing Trust," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 454, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    4. Sabater-Grande, Gerardo & García-Gallego, Aurora & Georgantzís, Nikolaos & Herranz-Zarzoso, Noemí, 2022. "The effects of personality, risk and other-regarding attitudes on trust and reciprocity," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

Chapters

  1. Harold Kincaid, 2004. "Methodological Individualism and Economics," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & Alain Marciano & Jochen Runde (ed.), The Elgar Companion To Economics and Philosophy, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Cited by:

    1. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska, 2017. "Inter- and intra-firm learning synergy through integrating absorptive capacity and employee suggestion processes: The case study of Frauenthal Automotive Toruń company," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(1), pages 25-67.
    2. Łukasz Hard, 2014. "Models of Mechanisms and their Role in Building Economic Explanations," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    3. Reinhard Neck, 2021. "Methodological Individualism: Still a Useful Methodology for the Social Sciences?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 49(4), pages 349-361, December.

Books

  1. Kincaid, Harold (ed.), 2012. "The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195392753.

    Cited by:

    1. Ryan Saylor, 2020. "Why Causal Mechanisms and Process Tracing Should Alter Case Selection Guidance," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(4), pages 982-1017, November.
    2. Marchionni, Caterina & Reijula, Samuli, 2018. "What is mechanistic evidence, and why do we need it for evidence-based policy?," SocArXiv 4ufbm, Center for Open Science.
    3. Dionissi Aliprantis, 2013. "Covariates and causal effects: the problem of context," Working Papers (Old Series) 1310, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    4. García Fernando Martel & Wantchekon Leonard, 2015. "A Graphical Approximation to Generalization: Definitions and Diagrams," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 71-86, June.
    5. Thomas Ambrosio & Jakob Tolstrup, 2019. "How do we tell authoritarian diffusion from illusion? Exploring methodological issues of qualitative research on authoritarian diffusion," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 2741-2763, November.
    6. Edgardo I. Garrido-P?rez & Katia Laura Sidali, 2014. "Salsa, sauce, and other ingredients: nature, evolution and conservation of cultural heritage," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 16(3), pages 81-104.
    7. María Caamaño-Alegre & José Caamaño-Alegre, 2019. "Economic experiments versus physical science experiments: an ontology-based approach," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, May.
    8. K. P. Mathotaarachchi & K. A. A. N. Thilakarathna, 2021. "Philosophy of Approaches in Social Sciences: A Review of Positivism, Phenomenology and Critical Social Sciences in Qualitative Research," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 20(1), pages 944-952, June.
    9. Gates, Emily F., 2016. "Making sense of the emerging conversation in evaluation about systems thinking and complexity science," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 62-73.
    10. Jörgen Sandberg & Mats Alvesson, 2021. "Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 487-516, March.
    11. Daniel J. Galvin, 2020. "Let’s not conflate APD with political history, and other reflections on “Causal Inference and American Political Development”," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 485-500, December.

  2. Kincaid, Harold & Ross, Don (ed.), 2009. "The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195189254.

    Cited by:

    1. Pierre Gosselin & Aïleen Lotz & Marc Wambst, 2013. "On Apparent Irrational Behaviors : Interacting Structures and the Mind," Working Papers hal-00851309, HAL.
    2. T. H. Gindling & Nadwa Mossaad & David Newhouse, 2016. "How Large are Earnings Penalties for Self-Employed and Informal Wage Workers?," IZA Journal of Labor & Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-39, December.
    3. Jason Raibley, 2012. "Happiness is not Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(6), pages 1105-1129, December.
    4. Daniel Navarro-Martinez & Graham Loomes & Andrea Isoni & David Butler & Larbi Alaoui, 2018. "Boundedly rational expected utility theory," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 199-223, December.
    5. Silvestri, Paolo, 2017. "Disputed (Disciplinary) Boundaries. Philosophy, Economics, Value Judgments," CESMEP Working Papers 201701, University of Turin.
    6. Galbács Peter, 2021. "What did it take for Lucas to set up ‘useful’ analogue systems in monetary business cycle theory?," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 61-82, September.
    7. John B. Davis, 2010. "Neuroeconomics: Constructing Identity," Post-Print hal-00911827, HAL.
    8. Grüne-Yanoff, Till & Verreault-Julien, Philippe, 2021. "How-possibly explanations in economics: anything goes?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108622, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Marcelo Bergolo & Guillermo Cruces, 2016. "The Anatomy of Behavioral Responses to Social Assistance when Informal Employment is High," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0204, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    10. Stan du Plessis, 2010. "Implications of the financial crisis for models in monetary policy," Working Papers 18/2010, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    11. Galbács, Péter, 2018. "A közgazdaságtan felszabadítása. A neoklasszikus ortodoxia és az intézményi közgazdaságtan közötti ellentét néhány módszertani kérdése [Freedom for economics. Some methodological aspects of the neo," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 44-65.
    12. Groß Steffen W., 2010. "Warum sich Ökonomen (wieder) mit Philosophie beschäftigen sollten – und Philosophen (wieder) mit Ökonomie / Why Economists should be more interested in Philosophy (again) – and why Philosophers should," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 61(1), pages 75-94, January.
    13. Mohd Mahyudi & Enizahura Abdul Aziz, 2018. "Method and Substance of Islamic Economics Revisited إعادة النظر في منهجية ومرتكزات الاقتصاد الإسلامي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 31(2), pages 33-50, July.
    14. Fabián Slonimczyk & Vladimir Gimpelson, 2015. "Informality and mobility," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 23(2), pages 299-341, April.
    15. Illoong Kwon & Kitae Sohn, 2017. "Job dissatisfaction of the self-employed in Indonesia," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 233-249, June.
    16. Boldyrev, I., 2011. "Economic Methodology Today: a Review of Major Contributions," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 9, pages 47-70.
    17. Dorothée Boccanfuso & Luc Savard, 2011. "A segmented labor supply model estimation for the construction of a CGE microsimulation model: An application to the Philippines," Cahiers de recherche 11-19, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    18. Krainer, Robert E., 2017. "Economic stability under alternative banking systems: Theory and policy," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 107-118.
    19. John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands, 2011. "Introduction: The Changing Character of Economic Methodology," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Carolina Cañibano & Jason Potts, 2019. "Toward an evolutionary theory of human capital," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 1017-1035, July.
    21. Donald W. Katzner, 2016. "The Stages of Model Building in Economics," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 4(2), pages 79-99, December.
    22. Dike, Onyemaechi, 2019. "Informal employment and work health risks: Evidence from Cambodia," MPRA Paper 92943, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Mar 2019.
    23. Nathanaël Colin-Jaeger & Thomas Delcey, 2020. "When efficient market hypothesis meets Hayek on information: beyond a methodological reading," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01933895, HAL.
    24. Andrea Salanti, 2020. "All That Glitters Is Not Gold: The Case of Mainstream Pluralism," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 54(2), pages 287-310, December.
    25. John S.L. McCombie & Ioana Negru, 2014. "On economic paradigms, rhetoric and the micro-foundations of macroeconomics," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 53-66, April.
    26. Nathanaël Colin-Jaeger & Thomas Delcey, 2020. "When efficient market hypothesis meets Hayek on information: beyond a methodological reading," Post-Print hal-01933895, HAL.
    27. J. Felipe & J.S.L. McCombie, 2014. "The Aggregate Production Function: 'Not Even Wrong'," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 60-84, January.
    28. Jesus Felipe & John S.L. McCombie, 2013. "The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1975.
    29. Galbács, Péter, 2017. "Max Weber és a modern makroökonómia újraértelmezése. Elméleti keret a kortárs makroökonómia módszertani elemzéséhez [Max Weber and reinterpretation of modern macroeconomics. A theoretical framework," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 285-304.
    30. Galbács, Péter, 2019. "A chicagonomics és a közgazdaságtan imperializmusa ["Chicagonomics" and the imperialism of economics]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 229-255.
    31. Galina V. Astratova, 2018. "A New Marketing Paradigm of Housing and Public Utilities in the 21st Century," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 19(1), pages 62-78, February.
    32. K. Vela Velupillai & Stefano Zambelli, 2011. "Computing in Economics," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    33. Przemysław Włodarczyk, 2016. "Modele reprezentatywnych podmiotów gospodarczych jako narzędzie analizy w nowej syntezie neoklasycznej," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 47(6), pages 553-584.
    34. Yalcintas, Altug, 2013. "The Oomph in economic philosophy: a bibliometric analysis of the main trends, from the 1960s to the present," MPRA Paper 44191, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    35. Axel v. Werder, 2011. "Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Opportunism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1345-1358, October.
    36. Anna Alexandrova & Daniel M. Haybron, 2011. "High-Fidelity Economics," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    37. Galbács, Péter, 2017. "Tudományunk jelene és jövője a tét. Az International Network for Economic Method 2017. évi konferenciája San Sebastián, 2017. augusztus 28-30 [The present and future of our science at stake. 2017 a," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1089-1096.

  3. Kincaid,Harold, 1996. "Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521482684.

    Cited by:

    1. David Kihangire, 2005. "The Effects Of Exchange Rate Variability On Exports: Evidence From Uganda (1988 – 2001)," International Trade 0505013, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Marc Orlitzky, 2011. "Institutionalized dualism: statistical significance testing as myth and ceremony," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 47-77, September.
    3. Steven Rappaport, 1996. "Abstraction and unrealistic assumptions in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 215-236.
    4. Marchionni, Caterina & Reijula, Samuli, 2018. "What is mechanistic evidence, and why do we need it for evidence-based policy?," SocArXiv 4ufbm, Center for Open Science.
    5. Ramzi Mabsout, 2014. "Bringing Ethics Back to Welfare Economics," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Pavlína Hejduková & Lucie Kureková, 2016. "Causality As A Tool For Empirical Analysis In Economics," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 4407035, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    7. Clive Beed & Cara Beed, 1997. "Realism and a Christian Perspective on Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 313-333.
    8. Alejandro Portes, 2008. "Migration and Social Change: Some Conceptual Reflections," Working Papers 1096, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Migration and Development..
    9. Malcolm Williams & Luke Sloan & Charlotte Brookfield, 2017. "A Tale of Two Sociologies: Analyzing Versus Critique in UK Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 132-151, December.
    10. Raina, Rajeswari S., 2003. "Disciplines, institutions and organizations: impact assessments in context," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 185-211, November.
    11. Timothy M. Devinney & Jan Hohberger, 2017. "The past is prologue: Moving on from Culture’s Consequences," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(1), pages 48-62, January.
    12. Rick Szostak, 2008. "Classifying Heterodoxy," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 97-126, March.
    13. Łukasz Hard, 2014. "Models of Mechanisms and their Role in Building Economic Explanations," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    14. Jesus Felipe & John S.L. McCombie, 2013. "The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1975.
    15. Matthew Longshore Smith & Carolina Seward, 2009. "The Relational Ontology of Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: Incorporating Social and Individual Causes," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 213-235.
    16. Lex Donaldson, 2008. "Ethics Problems and Problems with Ethics: Toward a Pro-Management Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 299-311, March.
    17. Donald W. Katzner, 2015. "A Neoclassical Curmudgeon Looks at Heterodox Criticisms of Microeconomics," World Economic Review, World Economics Association, vol. 2015(4), pages 1-63, February.
    18. Reinhard Neck, 2021. "Methodological Individualism: Still a Useful Methodology for the Social Sciences?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 49(4), pages 349-361, December.
    19. Tomas Hellström, 2008. "Transferability and Naturalistic Generalization: New Generalizability Concepts for Social Science or Old Wine in New Bottles?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 321-337, June.
    20. Clive Beed & Cara Beed, 1999. "Intellectual Progress and Academic Economics: Rational Choice and Game Theory," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 163-185, December.
    21. Khan, Amna & Lindridge, Andrew & Pusaksrikit, Theeranuch, 2018. "Why some South Asian Muslims celebrate Christmas: Introducing ‘acculturation trade-offs’," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 290-299.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 2 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (1) 2019-09-02
  2. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (1) 2019-09-02
  3. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (1) 2015-01-09
  4. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (1) 2019-09-02

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Harold Kincaid should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.