IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A chicagonomics és a közgazdaságtan imperializmusa
["Chicagonomics" and the imperialism of economics]

Author

Listed:
  • Galbács, Péter

Abstract

A tanulmány célja a chicagói közgazdaságtanként ismertté vált elméleti rendszer kialakulásának és korai fejlődésének áttekintése. A szerző az iskola történetét három szempontból, az árelmélet központi státusa, az oktatási program részletei és a workshoprendszer szerepe alapján vizsgálja. Ezek alapján arra következtethetünk, hogy az iskola sikeréhez mindhárom elem egyaránt hozzájárult, vagyis a chicagonomics egy radikális elmélet, egy megfelelően átalakított hallgatói követelményrendszer és egy szocializációs közegként üzemeltetett infrastruktúra közös terméke. Fontos körülményként a szerző arra is felhívja a figyelmet, hogy a Stigler és Becker által végrehajtott "imperialista" fordulat azért következett be, mert a költségek és hasznok összevetését az emberi döntések valós alapjának tekintették.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: B15, B16, B21, B22, B41.

Suggested Citation

  • Galbács, Péter, 2019. "A chicagonomics és a közgazdaságtan imperializmusa ["Chicagonomics" and the imperialism of economics]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 229-255.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1825
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2019.3.229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1825
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2019.3.229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ross B. Emmett (ed.), 2010. "The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2591.
    2. Reder, Melvin W, 1982. "Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-38, March.
    3. Milton Friedman, 1949. "The Marshallian Demand Curve," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 57, pages 463-463.
    4. Patinkin, Don, 1973. "Frank Knight as Teacher," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(5), pages 787-810, December.
    5. Ross B. Emmett, 2016. "Chicago School," Chapters, in: Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume II, chapter 25, pages 368-374, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. A. W. Phillips, 1958. "The Relation Between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 25(100), pages 283-299, November.
    7. De Vroey,Michel, 2016. "A History of Macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and Beyond," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107584945, January.
    8. John P. Henderson, 1976. "The History of Thought in the Development of the Chicago Paradigm," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 127-147, March.
    9. Milton Friedman, 1957. "A Theory of the Consumption Function," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number frie57-1, March.
    10. Ross Emmett, 2006. "De gustibus est disputandum: Frank H. Knight's reply to George Stigler and Gary Becker's 'De gustibus non est disputandum' with an introductory essay," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 97-111.
    11. Lucas, Robert E, Jr, 1975. "An Equilibrium Model of the Business Cycle," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 83(6), pages 1113-1144, December.
    12. Stigler, George J, 1976. "The Successes and Failures of Professor Smith," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(6), pages 1199-1213, December.
    13. Jacob Viner, 1925. "Objective Tests of Competitive Price Applied to the Cement Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33, pages 107-107.
    14. Hausman,Daniel M., 1992. "The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521425230, December.
    15. Malcolm Rutherford, 2010. "Chicago Economics and Institutionalism," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Stigler, George J & Becker, Gary S, 1977. "De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 76-90, March.
    17. Kincaid, Harold & Ross, Don (ed.), 2009. "The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195189254, Decembrie.
    18. Ross Emmett, 2007. "Oral History and the Historical Reconstruction of Chicago Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 39(5), pages 172-192, Supplemen.
    19. Frank H. Knight, 1925. "Economic Psychology and the Value Problem," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 39(3), pages 372-409.
    20. Milton Friedman, 1957. "Introduction to "A Theory of the Consumption Function"," NBER Chapters, in: A Theory of the Consumption Function, pages 1-6, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Mary S. Morgan & Malcolm Rutherford, 1998. "American Economics: The Character of the Transformation," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 30(5), pages 1-26, Supplemen.
    22. Ross B. Emmett, 2010. "Frank H. Knight," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    23. Becker, Gary S, 1993. "Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 101(3), pages 385-409, June.
    24. A. W. Coats, 1963. "The Origins of the "Chicago School(s)"?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 71, pages 487-487.
    25. Christ, Carl F, 1994. "The Cowles Commission's Contributions to Econometrics at Chicago, 1939-1955," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 32(1), pages 30-59, March.
    26. Ross B. Emmett, 2010. "Specializing in Interdisciplinarity: The Committee on Social Thought as the University of Chicago's Antidote to Compartmentalization in the Social Sciences," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 42(5), pages 261-287, Supplemen.
    27. Warren S. Gramm, 1975. "Chicago Economics: From Individualism True to Individualism False," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 753-775, December.
    28. Jaakko Kuorikoski & Aki Lehtinen, 2018. "Model selection in macroeconomics: DSGE and ad hocness," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 252-264, July.
    29. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1972. "Expectations and the neutrality of money," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 103-124, April.
    30. Ezra J. Mishan, 1975. "The Folklore of the Market: An Inquiry into the Economic Doctrines of the Chicago School," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 681-752, December.
    31. Hausman,Daniel M., 1992. "The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521415019, December.
    32. J. Daniel Hammond, 2010. "The Development of Post-war Chicago Price Theory," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    33. Charles K. Wilber & Jon D. Wisman, 1975. "The Chicago School: Positivism or Ideal Type," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 665-679, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Galbács, 2021. "How the attitude of Chicago economics towards philosophy changed over time: an essay on what role some historical methods should play in practicing the philosophy of economics," Post-Print hal-03414823, HAL.
    2. Galbács, Péter, 2017. "Max Weber és a modern makroökonómia újraértelmezése. Elméleti keret a kortárs makroökonómia módszertani elemzéséhez [Max Weber and reinterpretation of modern macroeconomics. A theoretical framework," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 285-304.
    3. Malcolm Rutherford, 2010. "Chicago Economics and Institutionalism," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Akhand Akhtar Hossain, 2009. "Central Banking and Monetary Policy in the Asia-Pacific," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12777.
    5. Goutsmedt, Aurélien & Truc, Alexandre, 2023. "An independent European macroeconomics? A history of European macroeconomics through the lens of the European Economic Review," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Christian Johnson & George G Kaufman, 2007. "Un banco, con cualquier otro nombre…," Boletín, CEMLA, vol. 0(4), pages 185-199, Octubre-d.
    7. Veisten, Knut, 2007. "Contingent valuation controversies: Philosophic debates about economic theory," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 204-232, April.
    8. Galbács Peter, 2021. "What did it take for Lucas to set up ‘useful’ analogue systems in monetary business cycle theory?," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 61-82, September.
    9. David Laidler, 2010. "Chicago Monetary Traditions," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Chollete, Loran & Ning, Cathy, 2009. "The Dependence Structure of Macroeconomic Variables in the US," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2009/31, University of Stavanger.
    11. Galbács, Péter, 2018. "A közgazdaságtan felszabadítása. A neoklasszikus ortodoxia és az intézményi közgazdaságtan közötti ellentét néhány módszertani kérdése [Freedom for economics. Some methodological aspects of the neo," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 44-65.
    12. Francisco José de Siqueira, 2007. "La instrumentación jurídica de la distribución de papel moneda de curso legal en Brasil," Boletín, CEMLA, vol. 0(4), pages 167-184, Octubre-d.
    13. Lothian, James R., 2009. "Milton Friedman's monetary economics and the quantity-theory tradition," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1086-1096, November.
    14. J. Daniel Hammond, 2010. "The Development of Post-war Chicago Price Theory," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Robert L. Hetzel, 2007. "Las contribuciones de Milton Friedman a la economía," Boletín, CEMLA, vol. 0(4), pages 150-166, Octubre-d.
    16. Marek Hudik, 2019. "Two interpretations of the rational choice theory and the relevance of behavioral critique," Rationality and Society, , vol. 31(4), pages 464-489, November.
    17. Bernt P. Stigum, 2015. "Introduction," Introductory Chapters, in: Econometrics and the Philosophy of Economics: Theory-Data Confrontations in Economics, Princeton University Press.
    18. Cléo Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, 2015. "Crossing Boundaries, Displacing Previous Knowledge and Claiming Superiority: Is the Economics of Discrimination a Conquest of Economics Imperialism?," STOREPapers 5_2015, Associazione Italiana per la Storia dell'Economia Politica - StorEP.
    19. Ole Røgeberg & Morten Nordberg, 2005. "A defence of absurd theories in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 543-562.
    20. John Geweke & Joel Horowitz & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2006. "Econometrics: A Bird’s Eye View," CESifo Working Paper Series 1870, CESifo.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
    • B16 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Quantitative and Mathematical
    • B21 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Microeconomics
    • B22 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Macroeconomics
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.